Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?
- Thread starter CantStop
- Start date
- Status
So now y'all have gone from arguing that he's better than Jabari to arguing that he's not a scrub? God's son across the belly, I prove you lost already and all that.
Who says I was done arguing Randle vs Parker?
I just so happened to run across an article which pretty much backed up EVERYTHING #LWO has said in reference to Julius Randle.......an article which you cannot even argue against
How ironic you wanna use a John Wall gif, when you ducked my tags about discussing John Wall 2.0
I guess what they say about you is true...you pick & choose your arguments
There's a # of things wrong with that article. Not only that but it's a pro-Lakers optimist piece, and not the perspective of a non-biased eye. If you can't see that Randle shouldn't be one of the main playmakers/pieces on the team you're only fooling yourself.Who says I was done arguing Randle vs Parker?
I just so happened to run across an article which pretty much backed up EVERYTHING #LWO has said in reference to Julius Randle.......an article which you cannot even argue against
i) What tags did I duck?How ironic you wanna use a John Wall gif, when you ducked my tags about discussing John Wall 2.0
I guess what they say about you is true...you pick & choose your arguments
ii) I've already told you that my "argument" was based on his potential. Why you continue to ignore this I do not know. Why you continue to bring this up when you don't watch Nuggets games I do not know. Why you continue to bring this up in this Parker/Randle thread, I do not know.
There's a # of things wrong with that article. Not only that but it's a pro-Lakers optimist piece, and not the perspective of a non-biased eye. If you can't see that Randle shouldn't be one of the main playmakers/pieces on the team you're only fooling yourself.
You're slightly switching your stance here....we NEVER argued if Randle should or shouldn't be one of the main playmakers/pieces. We argued that he IS while you and @Malta insisted he was just a garbage man and a 4th option. Maybe yall should listen to people who actually watch full Lakers games, game in/game out
I mean, the actual Head Coach of the Lakers is pushing the same issue we've argued over and over in here, but yall claim we're wrong......which means you're claiming he's wrong as well
Randle & Parker both play tonight
- "Bu-Bu-But...Emmanuel Mudiay can become just as good as John Wall": D'Loading vs Mudiay Thread Pt. 2
Emmanuel Mudiay 2017 stats: 13.9 ppg (on 35.7% FG & 27.8% 3pt), 4.6 rebs, 4.2 apg to 3.0 tovs, 1.0 stl in 31.2 mpg and leading the Nuggets to a 7-13 record.
D'Angelo Russell 2017 stats: 16.1 ppg (on 41.3% FG & 37.2% 3pt), 3.4 rebs, 4.8 apg to 3.0 tovs, 1.3 stls in 26.8 mpg and leading the Lakers to a 7-6 record
@Darealtwo1 @Gil Scott-Heroin It's about that time to get it started
at Mudiay stans
Mudiay has played 20 games this season.....he's hit at least 40% of his shots only 7x this season
Mudiay's offense over the last 2 weeks? 28.7 minutes per game, 10.3 ppg on 32.9% FG
@Darealtwo1 @Gil Scott-Heroin
8th in the NBA in turnovers per game.......46th in the NBA in assists per game?
Tied for 6th in most total turnovers in the NBA this season......39th in the NBA in total assists?
So, this is the PG who's better than D'Angelo Russell @Darealtwo1 @Gil Scott-Heroin?
This is the guy who can become just as good as John Wall huh?
You ducked me, so since you only pick and choose which arguments you respond too....I will also from now on
2) You said:
Maybe initially you were arguing "potential", but you then switched in the same post and flat out predicted him to become just as good as Wall................and Im never letting you live that down
Threads get upped everyday b
Randle & Parker both play tonight
Their last 10 games -
Randle
9.6ppg
9.0rpg
2.3apg
0.6spg
0.3bpg
.439%
Parker
18.5ppg
5.8rpg
2.5apg
1.4spg
0.2bpg
.458%
The only advantage Randle has had is rebounding, and some of those have been when he recovers his own miss
Doesn't matter what happens tonight cause on the season Parker has been better, in the short term Parker has been better and in the long term he has more potential. Like I said before the season the only way Randle has a better year is if Parker gets hurt and misses time, otherwise this shyt is over.Ah, yes y'all did. Clearly you haven't been paying enough attention to this thread. At this current stage he is just a garbage man, and nothing really more. His current role exceeds what his skillset/ability can handle.You're slightly switching your stance here....we NEVER argued if Randle should or shouldn't be one of the main playmakers/pieces. We argued that he IS while you and @Malta insisted he was just a garbage man and a 4th option. Maybe yall should listen to people who actually watch full Lakers games, game in/game out
Walton is only trying to get the best out of him, I can't criticize him for that. It's what the coach is suppose to do. Not pull the shyt that Scott did last season.I mean, the actual Head Coach of the Lakers is pushing the same issue we've argued over and over in here, but yall claim we're wrong......which means you're claiming he's wrong as well
The argument has always been about his potential. Why did you leave out the rest of my post? You did this last time and I called you out on it. This is some horrible trolling. Stop twisting my posts, and leaving out important context:Maybe initially you were arguing "potential", but you then switched in the same post and flat out predicted him to become just as good as Wall................and Im never letting you live that down
"His best case scenario is a similar path to Wall's (again let's not act Wall is some unattainable projection that Mudiay can't reach like he's Westbrook or Curry). I can definitely see Mudiay becoming just as good as Wall has become. The same talking points around his game are almost identical to what was said about Wall during his first few seasons."
"Wrong. His best case scenario is that he has a similar career trajectory to John Wall - which is A LOT better than Stuckey. Big, quick pass-first PGs who can run an offense, get to the rim at will, great floor vision, great passing ability who have an inconsistent jump shot."
That's clearly talking about his ceiling. You're shameless that you didn't even bother to quote my post properly (because you knew I'd click on it and see what you left out).
Slap yourself.
Their last 10 games -
Randle
9.6ppg
9.0rpg
2.3apg
0.6spg
0.3bpg
.439%
Parker
18.5ppg
5.8rpg
2.5apg
1.4spg
0.2bpg
.458%
The only advantage Randle has had is rebounding, and some of those have been when he recovers his own miss
We calling the thread like Randle aint still got 59 more games of production left in him?
Randle's dealing with and playing thru injury...that's why his numbers have dropped. As well as not having the best player on the team or the best shooter in the starting lineup with him. It would be like Parker being hurt and still playing while ATK and Middleton is out.
Funny thing about your last season is that is basically what's happening right now....except it's Randle and not Parker: "Like I said before the season the only way Parker has a better year is if Randle gets hurt and misses time, otherwise this shyt is over", but yall trying to run with the short term W right now, bc yall know a healthy Randle with his full team around him is > Parker
@Newzz before you address that other post, can you explain this -
@Newzz I just clicked on that post you referenced and you conveniently left out the last sentence -
If I'm at work, I've got three monitors and I've got a laptop and extra monitor at the crib (and a tv for the national games). There's a lot of breaks (timeouts, dead balls, free throw attempts, subs etc etc) where you can juggle watching two-three games without missing "important action". Plus if two games are on at the same time and it's getting close to halftime (five or so minutes) - I switch to one and then when it's halftime I go back and watch the other last five minutes of the second half of the other game. When there's a bunch of games on, I'm usually 10-20 minutes behind them live so I can watch them. Plus not to mention, I watch games at the end of the night when they've finished.
I don't watch EVERY game, but I watch most when I can, even if it's the next day.
Horrible trolling from you.
I said I don't watch every game, you say I'm lying and that I did say that... you then reference a post of mine that specifically says "I don't watch every game" but you take it out and use the rest of the post as evidence for me saying I watch every game.
That level of dishonesty is neg worthy.
Why did you leave out the rest of my post? You did this last time and I called you out on it. This is some horrible trolling. Stop twisting my posts, and leaving out important context:
You're slightly switching your stance here....we NEVER argued if Randle should or shouldn't be one of the main playmakers/pieces. We argued that he IS while you and @Malta insisted he was just a garbage man and a 4th option. Maybe yall should listen to people who actually watch full Lakers games, game in/game out
I mean, the actual Head Coach of the Lakers is pushing the same issue we've argued over and over in here, but yall claim we're wrong......which means you're claiming he's wrong as well
That's clearly talking about he IS the main playmaker/main piece of the team. You're shameless that you didn't even bother to quote my post properly (because you knew I'd click on it and see what you left out).
Slap yourself
I tagged you properly....you ducked me
Tuck your tail because Mudiay is proving you to be a false prophet brehs
The argument has always been about his potential. Why did you leave out the rest of my post? You did this last time and I called you out on it. This is some horrible trolling. Stop twisting my posts, and leaving out important context:
"His best case scenario is a similar path to Wall's (again let's not act Wall is some unattainable projection that Mudiay can't reach like he's Westbrook or Curry). I can definitely see Mudiay becoming just as good as Wall has become. The same talking points around his game are almost identical to what was said about Wall during his first few seasons."
"Wrong. His best case scenario is that he has a similar career trajectory to John Wall - which is A LOT better than Stuckey. Big, quick pass-first PGs who can run an offense, get to the rim at will, great floor vision, great passing ability who have an inconsistent jump shot."
That's clearly talking about his ceiling. You're shameless that you didn't even bother to quote my post properly (because you knew I'd click on it and see what you left out).
Slap yourself.
You said, in the same post you quoted (in the same post that I POSTED THE ENTIRE QUOTE.....so shut up
), that you:can definitely see Mudiay becoming just as good as Wall has become
^^^ That's not a potential statement. You literally said you can DEFINITELY see him becoming just as good as John Wall
That's a definite statement breh....if you didn't know, definitely means something without a doubt. How you try and spin that into a "potentially" which means a probability is
to me. You must be from the South
You aint spinning yourself out of that
Explain what?
The fact I think you're lying in that post?
And, again, another example of you lying blantantly.......I didn't take ANYTHING out of your post. I posted your ridicoulous quote and added a
in which you even quoted my post and all I had was a that came up AND there's no edits of my original post:I don't watch every single NBA game either, and I have NEVER stated so. Not only did you lie trying to imitate me, but you also lied about me saying I watched every game too. #LWO when does ya lies end? When does the truth begin?
Nowhere do I state in that post that I watch every game. Just that I can watch multiple games at a time. Are you being dense on purpose?@Newzz I just clicked on that post you referenced and you conveniently left out the last sentence -
Horrible trolling from you.
I said I don't watch every game, you say I'm lying and that I did say that... you then reference a post of mine that specifically says "I don't watch every game" but you take it out and use the rest of the post as evidence for me saying I watch every game.
That level of dishonesty is neg worthy.
So why do you keep lying?
@Malta you running with a dude who compulsively lies like this and expect #LWO to keep playing by the rules?
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
This thread backfired 
This doesn't make any sense to what you replied to.
Well it's strange I never got any alert from you tagging me, and it's strange that the other poster you tagged didn't reply either. And it's also strange that NOBODY replied to the thread. I've looked through all my alerts over the last 5-6 days and there's none from you in regards to that thread. This thread was made last week and I was tagged in it and I replied -I tagged you properly....you ducked me
Tuck your tail because Mudiay is proving you to be a false prophet brehs
Nuggets coach Mike Malone getting frustrated w/ Emmanuel Mudiay. I have no reason to duck shyt.
You said, in the same post you quoted (in the same post that I POSTED THE ENTIRE QUOTE.....so shut up
can definitely see Mudiay becoming just as good as Wall has become
^^^ That's not a potential statement. You literally said you can DEFINITELY see him becoming just as good as John Wall
I clearly stated before that his best case scenario is similar to Wall - that's the premise I'm working on. Quite clearly when I was talking about him becoming just as good as Wall has become, it was talking about the player that Wall was at that time of the post (if we go off surface stats) which was a 19.9 ppg on 42% shooting, 10 assists, 4 turnovers type player at the age of 25/26 from last season.
Last edited:
- Status