"Hes not the next John Wall...he just has the potential to be the next John Wall"
^^^ What kind of nbadraft.net level scouting report is that @Gil Scott-Heroin ?![]()

"Hes not the next John Wall...he just has the potential to be the next John Wall"
^^^ What kind of nbadraft.net level scouting report is that @Gil Scott-Heroin ?![]()
Nobody said Mudiay was going to be superstar this season. Most folk talked about his potential. Meanwhile, y'all nikkas tlaking about D'angelo taking over the league this season.You got about 10 more games before Mudiay going up on that Summer Jam screen![]()
You not about to hop in this beef, you been disavowing LWO till now and now you trying to get back in now that the song been hot? You not Busta Rhyming your way into a hit on this one![]()
Surely you aren't this slow. When somebody talks about a player's potential, what is it you think they're talking about?"Hes not the next John Wall...he just has the potential to be the next John Wall"
^^^ What kind of nbadraft.net level scouting report is that @Gil Scott-Heroin ?![]()
Nobody said Mudiay was going to be superstar this season. Most folk talked about his potential. Meanwhile, y'all nikkas tlaking about D'angelo taking over the league this season.
Be careful that I don't release the flutes on y'all if D'Angelo doesn't start playing y'all said he would.![]()
NBA Real Plus-Minus - National Basketball Association - ESPN
He's been the 10th most impactful PG and he's the youngest on the list.![]()
NBA Real Plus-Minus - National Basketball Association - ESPN
He's been the 10th most impactful PG and he's the youngest on the list.![]()
Using your own soldiers and their weapons to kill your argument..... Checkmate.for linking that madeup bullshyt of a statistic. ESPN ain't credible.
I expect this will go how all the other *insert Lakers player* > arguments go when they don't go your way - swept under the rug and replaced with another *insert Lakers player* > argument. Rinse and repeat to you blind squirrels find a nut.
I'm not him and he's not me. Youre on some clown shyt right now.Using your own soldiers and their weapons to kill your argument..... Checkmate.![]()
at goal post moving when I've been saying the EXACT same thing ever since the start of this thread - compare Randle to players who had a similar role/skillset to him.
Jabari's better than Randle though.![]()
If you watched him play and didn't reference something as frivolous as double-doubles you'd see why.![]()
You don't use PER for determining who's the better player. You have to provide context to the selective stats you referenced. You're not even going to mentioning their shooting percentages - I mean how disingenuous can you be?
Why should I need to explain when if you actually watch Jabari play (instead of picking and choosing what you take out of the box score), you'd see why. You just love to make thesethreads about how all these Lakers players are better than their counterparts when you don't even watch them play. I'm not the one looking for attention. That would be you. What's even more stupid on your part - Randle has only played 33 games and Parker 53 games - they're basically both rookies. How the hell you came to the conclusion that TheColi collective were wrong about Parker being the better player when neither have even played a full season is comical.
You can use all those, but you have to provide the PROPER context. Why the fukk did you leave out their shooting percentages? This is just scratching the surface on how flawed your logic is -
This season -
Randle - 11.6 ppg on 42% shooting (10.6 shots per game)
Jabari - 10.6 ppg on 46% shooting (9.4 shots per game)
Last season -
Jabari - 12.3 ppg on 49% shooting (10.5 shots per game). Only played 25 games before he was injured.
So basically even though both of them haven't even played a full season yet, Jabari has proven to score more points on better efficiency.
It's more like this:
CantStop: Let me call out TheColi collective on another one of my troll agendas and tell them that they were wrong about two players (one being a Lakers player) who haven't even played a full season yet. And what I'll do is, make sure to just pick all the surface stats that suit my agenda - I'll have to make sure to leave out Randle's shooting percentages since they're abysmal. I'll also leave out their roles on their respective teams and I'll also leave out the fact that I don't watch Bucks games.
![]()
This is his shooting map from college -
(you'll have to click on the icon as it's not showing up)![]()
He simply doesn't have a 3-pt shot yet - he only works from the midrange in. Part of it is the lineups he plays with and another is it doesn't seem Kidd is trying to force him into extending his shooting game before he's ready. He shot 32% last season on jumpshots and 32% this season - which is by no means great by any stretch of the imagination but it's certainly better than Randle who only shoots 28%. He also is more efficient at the rim too.
Everything is relevant, but the only thing that Randle is better than him at is rebounding - which really isn't saying much since Randle's main role is to crash the boards since he's the only one who actively attacks the glass when he's on the court.
PPG - Randle averages ONE more point while taking ONE more shot (Randle - 11 points on 10 shots. Jabari - 10 points on 9 shots).
Assists - Randle averages 1.6 assists per game and Parker averages 1.2 assist per game - basically identical numbers.
Steals - Randle averages 0.8 steals per game and Parker averages 0.6 steals per game - basically identical numbers.
Do I even need to state the obvious here?
Yeah this is why I can tell you don't watch Bucks games. His role isn't stamped. He's still working his way back from injury and doesn't have a strict role within the offense - which is mostly down to personnel issues and conflicts.
Of course they do, but he hasn't even played a full season's worth of games yet breh. It's still far too early to be talking about what he SHOULD be doing on offense when he's yet to find his identity in the league. Partly why this thread is straight up basura.
He can shoot and he can create his own shot. He just needs time to put it together. He's still basically a rookie on a dysfunctional team.
More productive based on what?
That's the funniest thing about this shyt is - dude really just made a thread saying "Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?" like they've been in the league for 10 years of some shyt. Both haven't even played a full season's worth of games yet.
![]()
Barring Jabari having a career-ending injury, this thread is going to end up in you taking a L.
Before he was injured last season -
![]()
Oh look Jabari averaged more points (on higher efficiency), more assists and more steals than Julius' best season![]()
Nobody said Mudiay was going to be superstar this season. Most folk talked about his potential. Meanwhile, y'all nikkas tlaking about D'angelo taking over the league this season.
Be careful that I don't release the flutes on y'all if D'Angelo doesn't start playing y'all said he would.![]()
Oh really?
Because these are all your posts from the 1st page of this thread...and what do you know:
Nowhere did you say those things
Looks like you were pretty happy to engage in the debate![]()
Surely you aren't this slow. When somebody talks about a player's potential, what is it you think they're talking about?![]()