Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?

[Bilz]

Ignoring how offenses are ran. Randle handles the ball looking to keep it moving for the team or spot an open shooter. Jabari handles it for himself and should be looking to create open looks for others and he just can't do it and shoots over and over and over again. Jabari is just garbage at everything, y'all need to learn to deal with it.

 

[Dwight Howard]

If that's the case than neither can Randle.

There's no need for Randle to have his hands on the ball at all.

at you thinking what Julius is doing is something special.

this post is the definition of check mate. no arguments, no stats, no nothing

my stats show Julius can consistently create for others

my stats show Julius is in the top 10-percentile when it comes to PF's/C's generating asssist'

where are yours?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

this post is the definition of check mate. no arguments, no stats, no nothing

my stats show Julius can consistently create for others

my stats show Julius is in the top 10-percentile when it comes to PF's/C's generating asssist'

where are yours?

You just literally quoted my post prior with all the "playmaking" stats in it. Your username is befitting.

 

[KOBE]

You say you watch Bucks games, but judging from this statement and 99% of your other posts about his game it's quite clear you don't.

Not my fault I've yet to see playmaker Jabari in any of the games I've seen.

 

[Dwight Howard]

You just literally quoted my post prior with all the "playmaking" stats in it. Your username is befitting.

Your stats dont undermine my argument that Julius is a better playmaker so im not sure why you posted those

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Your stats dont undermine my argument that Julius is a better playmaker so im not sure why you posted those

*looks at post concerning their assists*

In fact @I.AM.PIFF:

For every minute that Randle handles the ball he averages 1.7 assists (surrounded by the likes of D'Angelo, Lou Will and Nick Young)
For every minute that Jabari handles the ball he averages 1.3 assists (surrounded by the likes of Dellavedova, Snell and Henson)

Jabari has a 1.43 assist/turnover ratio
Randle has a 1.42 assist/turnover ratio

If Jabari is a "non-passing" ass player, I guess that makes Randle one too.

Ah yes they do.

 

[KOBE]

Parker has a career high of 5 assists. This man cannot create for others. Next you'll be calling Parker a good rebounder.

 

[Newzz]

Now...JaSorry is just as good, or a better, passer than Randle is?


I guess @Gil Scott-Heroin ain't watching Lakers games

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Parker has a career high of 5 assists. This man cannot create for others. Next you'll be calling Parker a good rebounder.

i) What does his career-high have to do with anything? If anything it shows he's more consistent than Randle is. After all they practically average the same amount of assists when handling the ball, despite Randle being surrounded by better offensive players.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Now...JaSorry is just as good, or a better, passer than Randle is?


I guess @Gil Scott-Heroin ain't watching Lakers games

It's not about him being "just as good, or better" - it's about Randle's playmaking basically being meaningless in this comparison. Y'all are carrying on about how great his playmaking ability is when he averages around the same amount of assists as Jabari does (and a worse assist/turnover ratio), yet somehow Jabari "can't create for others".

Typical Lakers stan logic.

 

[KOBE]

i) What does his career-high have to do with anything? If anything it shows he's more consistent than Randle is. After all they practically average the same amount of assists when handling the ball, despite Randle being surrounded by better offensive players.

No one but you goes by how many assists people average while handling the ball. Probably for good reason.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

No one but you goes by how many assists people average while handling the ball. Probably for good reason.

Because people would much rather push their silly ass agendas than acknowledge the truth.

 

[Dwight Howard]

per 100 possessions

Julius - 6.6 apg
Jabari - 3.6 apg

per 36

Julius- 4.9
Jabari - 2.5

not really that close

 

[Newzz]

It's not about him being "just as good, or better" - it's about Randle's playmaking basically being meaningless in this comparison. Y'all are carrying on about how great his playmaking ability is when he averages around the same amount of assists as Jabari does (and a worse assist/turnover ratio), yet somehow Jabari "can't create for others".

Typical Lakers stan logic.

Randle averages 4 assists in 28 minutes...Parker averages 2 assists in 33 minutes


Something is off here


JaSorry averages 5 more minutes per game on the court than Randle....but gets half the assists


You must've been using the typical Lakers hater logic

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Randle averages 4 assists in 28 minutes...Parker averages 2 assists in 33 minutes


Something is off here


JaSorry averages 5 more minutes per game on the court than Randle....but gets half the assists


You must've been using the typical Lakers hater logic

In fact @I.AM.PIFF:

For every minute that Randle handles the ball he averages 1.7 assists (surrounded by the likes of D'Angelo, Lou Will and Nick Young)
For every minute that Jabari handles the ball he averages 1.3 assists (surrounded by the likes of Dellavedova, Snell and Henson)

Jabari has a 1.43 assist/turnover ratio
Randle has a 1.42 assist/turnover ratio

If Jabari is a "non-passing" ass player, I guess that makes Randle one too.

Randle handles the ball for 2.2 minutes per game
Jabari handles he ball for 1.7 minutes per game.

Just because he's on the court for more minutes doesn't mean he has the ball in his hands more too. Why does simple shyt like this even need to be explained?