Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

let's talk about Jabari being carried by Giannis once again

Spoken like somebody that didn't watch the game. This thread is already over. @CantStop has conceded.

 

[KOBE]

Spoken like somebody that didn't watch the game. This thread is already over. @CantStop has conceded.

I watched the game against the Cavs and you had troubles even admitting they he got carried and had virtually zero impact on the game.


The hypocrisy of you trying to say I can't admit a loss when that's all you do. You even had a quote in your sig saying you never lose.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I watched the game against the Cavs and you had troubles even admitting they he got carried and had virtually zero impact on the game.

at this nonsense. He was their second leading scorer; the Bucks were only leading by a single digit when Parker proceeded to drop 9 points - he was the main player responsible for blowing out the margin to 18 points at the end of the third. Giannis was the star of the game, but Jabari's contribution during the third quarter basically put the game away. You can't marginalize his performance to 'he had virtually zero impact on the game' - that is a damn lie.

The hypocrisy of you trying to say I can't admit a loss when that's all you do. You even had a quote in your sig saying you never lose.

You don't even know what the fukk you're talking about. Even when facts are in front of you, you blatantly try to shift the argument or lie.

 

[KOBE]

Why were the Bucks down in the Cavs game, Gil Scott? Was was there ever a Cavs lead? Why did the Bucks have to comeback in the 2nd quarter opposed to begin a massive blowout in the third quarter?

I'll wait for the deflection.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Why were the Bucks down in the Cavs game, Gil Scott? Was was there ever a Cavs lead? Why did the Bucks have to comeback in the 2nd quarter opposed to begin a massive blowout in the third quarter?

I'll wait for the deflection.

Is this what you're going to do every time I debunk your posts, come up with new shyt instead of admitting that you were wrong in the first place?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@KOBE look at this and then compare it to Randle's struggle game against the Bulls.

Look at how fluid he is driving to the rim

Look at how coordinated he is when finishing around the rim

Look at how smooth his jumpshot looks on pullups and off screens

Now compare that to when Randle puts his head down and bulldozes towards the rim

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@I.AM.PIFF
@Dwight Howard
@CantStop
@Newzz

Y'all can come get some of this too -

 

[Sccit]

JABARI'S HIGHLIGHTS COO, BUT THEY LOOK BASIC IN COMPARISON TO RANDLE'S

 

[I.AM.PIFF]

@KOBE look at this and then compare it to Randle's struggle game against the Bulls.

Look at how fluid he is driving to the rim

Look at how coordinated he is when finishing around the rim

Look at how smooth his jumpshot looks on pullups and off screens

Now compare that to when Randle puts his head down and bulldozes towards the rim

Jabari's a better scorer but Randle does most of everything else better, even shooting like shyt against the Bulls, young JuBo had a grown man game and bullied the Chicago boys on the glass

 

[KOBE]

Why were the Bucks down in the Cavs game, Gil Scott? Was was there ever a Cavs lead? Why did the Bucks have to comeback in the 2nd quarter opposed to begin a massive blowout in the third quarter?

I'll wait for the deflection.

Is this what you're going to do every time I debunk your posts, come up with new shyt instead of admitting that you were wrong in the first place?

I knew you wouldn't disappoint.

 

[Loose]

Randle is allowing 60% at the rim right now , that's concerning

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I knew you wouldn't disappoint.

Why are you asking questions you already know the answers to?

Why is it every time you say state something and I prove you wrong, you go and shift the argument?

Why are you still arguing in this thread when your #1 option has already conceded?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Jabari's a better scorer but Randle does most of everything else better, even shooting like shyt against the Bulls, young JuBo had a grown man game and bullied the Chicago boys on the glass

There's a HUGE problem with this statement, it's not about how many things you do better on the court, it's 1. how GOOD you are at the things you do 2. how much IMPACT you have with the things you do.

You say Randle does most of everything else better, what are these things? And do they have any tangible effect on the game. Randle has the ball in his hands more than Jabari, yet Jabari still generates more production from points/assists by a decent margin (on better efficiency). Imagine if Jabari handled the ball as much as Randle, and Randle handled the ball as much as Jabari - the gap between their respective production would be even bigger would it not?

 

[Sccit]

Why are you asking questions you already know the answers to?

Why is it every time you say state something and I prove you wrong, you go and shift the argument?

Why are you still arguing in this thread when your #1 option has already conceded?

I NEVER CONCEDED

 

[Sccit]

There's a HUGE problem with this statement, it's not about how many things you do better on the court, it's 1. how GOOD you are at the things you do 2. how much IMPACT you have with the things you do.

You say Randle does most of everything else better, what are these things? And do they have any tangible effect on the game. Randle has the ball in his hands more than Jabari, yet Jabari still generates more production from points/assists by a decent margin (on better efficiency). Imagine if Jabari handled the ball as much as Randle, and Randle handled the ball as much as Jabari - the gap between their respective production would be even bigger would it not?

WHAT UR FAILING TO REALIZE IS THAT JABARI DOESNT HAVE THE HANDLES THAT JULIUS HAS IN ORDER TO "HANDLE IT AS MUCH" ..U GOT IT BACKWARDS BRUH. INSTEAD OF FAILING TO REALIZE, U NEED TO REALIZE U FAILED.