Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

#1 options don't come off the bench


Randle was the #1 option vs the Bulls

Randle wasn't the #1 option vs the Bulls. Sounds like somebody didn't watch the game. Why do you think he was the #1 option? Be careful how you answer.

Secondly, you and Malta said we cant compare Randle's numbers to Jabari's, because Parker was a #2 option being gameplanned for while Randle wasn't.........but now, you wanna compare a game where Randle was the #1 option, being gameplanned for, vs Parker's, as a sidekick being carried by Giannis once again, numbers

What the hell are you even saying here? Randle wasn't the #1 option in the Bulls game so you can miss me with all this nonsense.

Lastly, when it comes to last night's Bucks/Nets game, I told you last year, I watch every single NBA game....just like you do

#LWO scraping the bottom of the barrel with these tired ass troll attempts. How you gonna let Malta and I run through your whole fanbase like this?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@Newzz remember to be careful with your answer regarding Randle as the #1 option v the Bulls.

 

[Newzz]

Randle wasn't the #1 option vs the Bulls. Sounds like somebody didn't watch the game. Why do you think he was the #1 option? Be careful how you answer.

Randle was the #1 option vs the Bulls....I just told you this. Why do I think? Because I watched the game, unlike you


You're box score hunting by even hinting that Clarkson or Lou Williams were the #1 option, because they came off the bench as I said....and #1 options don't come off the bench

What the hell are you even saying here? Randle wasn't the #1 option in the Bulls game so you can miss me with all this nonsense.

yes he was

#LWO scraping the bottom of the barrel with these tired ass troll attempts. How you gonna let Malta and I run through your whole fanbase like this?

You and Malta are losing badly at this point...it's just hilarious. Why do you think posters are randomly coming in and saying you need to be negged for your opinions?

@Newzz remember to be careful with your answer regarding Randle as the #1 option v the Bulls.

#1 options don't come off the bench


Randle was the #1 option vs the Bulls

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@Newzz but I'm asking you why do you think Randle was the #1 option v the Bulls? What leads you to believe this?

 

[Newzz]

@Newzz but I'm asking you why do you think Randle was the #1 option v the Bulls? What leads you to believe this?

Randle was the #1 option vs the Bulls....I just told you this. Why do I think? Because I watched the game, unlike you


You're box score hunting by even hinting that Clarkson or Lou Williams were the #1 option, because they came off the bench as I said....and #1 options don't come off the bench

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Randle was the #1 option vs the Bulls....I just told you this. Why do I think? Because I watched the game, unlike you


You're box score hunting by even hinting that Clarkson or Lou Williams were the #1 option, because they came off the bench as I said....and #1 options don't come off the bench

Actually #1 options can come off the bench. If that bench player is getting the majority of touches and shots on starter type minutes - they're most likely the #1 option. Why can't you answer the question? What evidence do you have to suggest that Randle was the #1 option? Did he play the most minutes? Did he have the most shots? What was it?

 

[Newzz]

Actually #1 options can come off the bench. If that bench player is getting the majority of touches and shots on starter type minutes - they're most likely the #1 option.

Nope. There's no #1 option coming off the bench in the NBA that's not either injured/having his minutes restricted.


There's no strictly bench player who's the #1 option on his team in the NBA....or he wouldn't be coming off the bench while healthy.

Why can't you answer the question? What evidence do you have to suggest that Randle was the #1 option? Did he play the most minutes? Did he have the most shots? What was it?

I've answered it multiple times....what do you mean "what evidence"?




I thought you watched the game?



You wouldn't need "evidence" or stats to tell you if you actually did watch the game as you claimed you had

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Nope.

Yes.

I've answered it multiple times....what do you mean "what evidence"?




I thought you watched the game?



You wouldn't need "evidence" or stats to tell you if you actually did watch the game as you claimed you had

You haven't answered my question. I'm asking you why do you believe he was the #1 option? Why do you keep deflecting? You don't have to provide stats, I'm asking you to give an explanation of why he was the #1 option. Why is this so hard for you to do?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Okay @Newzz let's say for argument's sake #1 options can't come off the bench, what makes you believe he was the #1 option v the Bulls?

 

[Newzz]

Yes.



You haven't answered my question. I'm asking you why do you believe he was the #1 option? Why do you keep deflecting? You don't have to provide stats, I'm asking you to give an explanation of why he was the #1 option. Why is this so hard for you to do?

Why would I have to re-break down a game you claimed to have watched?




Unless you admit you DIDNT watch.....then I'd go into detail

 

[Newzz]

Okay @Newzz let's say for argument's sake #1 options can't come off the bench, what makes you believe he was the #1 option v the Bulls?

Why would I have to re-break down a game you claimed to have watched?




Unless you admit you DIDNT watch.....then I'd go into detail

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Why would I have to re-break down a game you claimed to have watched?

I'm not asking you to break the game down, I'm just asking you why you believe Randle was the #1 option in that game.

Why can;t you answer a simple question?

Your neck getting sore?

 

[Newzz]

I'm not asking you to break the game down, I'm just asking you why you believe Randle was the #1 option in that game.

Why can;t you answer a simple question?

Your neck getting sore?

Randle was the #1 option because he was our best offensive player in the starting lineup and the offense went thru him



Being that you didn't watch the game, I have to mentally dock -10 points off your rep for missing out on another Randle outstanding performance on the boards as well

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Randle was the #1 option because he was our best offensive player in the starting lineup and the offense went thru him

You didn't even watch the game at all. It's painfully obvious.

Being that you didn't watch the game, I have to mentally dock -10 points off your rep for missing out on another Randle outstanding performance on the boards as well

I did and he wasn't the #1 option. That main option loads were shared between Ingram, Clarkson and Lou Will.

 

[Newzz]

You didn't even watch the game at all. It's painfully obvious.

I did and he wasn't the #1 option. That main option loads were shared between Ingram, Clarkson and Lou Will.

2 of the 3 people you named are bench players (not #1 options)......the 3rd is not a better offensive player than Julius Randle right now. You're lying to yourself in that post






































But I guess, in the words of Tunechi, if you'd lie to yourself...you'd lie to anybody




Keep it up breh