Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?

[Newzz]

I addressed that quote by saying - I see no reason why he can't become a 19.9 ppg/42% shooting, 10 assists, 4 turnover type-player at the age of 25. - that's the type of player Wall was when I posted these comments:

"His best case scenario is a similar path to Wall's (again let's not act Wall is some unattainable projection that Mudiay can't reach like he's Westbrook or Curry). I can definitely see Mudiay becoming just as good as Wall has become. The same talking points around his game are almost identical to what was said about Wall during his first few seasons."

"Wrong. His best case scenario is that he has a similar career trajectory to John Wall - which is A LOT better than Stuckey. Big, quick pass-first PGs who can run an offense, get to the rim at will, great floor vision, great passing ability who have an inconsistent jump shot."



You're too much of a rockbrain to fukk with me breh. You can't even read properly.

Now I'm waiting for you to explain why you lied.

You're just gonna keep bolding your own things and not addressing the elephant in the room huh.....the fact you said you can clearly and undeniably see Mudiay becoming just as good as Wall?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Because it looks like you're lying again, because, like I said, I tagged him in regards to Randle/Parker:




So where was I accusing you of lying in this post where I tagged him?



Oh...another curious and ironic case of Gilly making up scenarios that didn't happen huh?



That's the usual

@Malta you running with a dude who compulsively lies like this and expect #LWO to keep playing by the rules?

Malta then replied to that post of yours -

You just made that post like 45 minutes ago. Do you have bad memory or some shyt?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

This nikka @Newzz doesn't even know what he's posting anymore.

 

[Newzz]

How funny, another Malta response to me that's addressing Randle/Parker @Gil Scott-Heroin


Like I said....take your L with some grace


Anyways:

Nope, you not about to use the Laker missing starters when Jabari has played without an elite floor spacer all season, if the Bucks had Middleton they'd most likely be 2nd or 3rd in the East right now. Yall turned a blind eye to Middleton being out all this time but now want to use players being out for a reason why Randle has looked like Paul MillSAD.


@Gil Scott-Heroin asked yall what Randle would be without shooters and we found out, a dude yall will make excuses for non-stop while not looking at the fact the Bucks don't have shooting

Paul MillSAD is a good one....I should've thought of that Guess, I'll have to stick with JaSorri for now


Randle has played without an elite floor spacer all season as well


And how would he look without shooters? He's hurt...let him get healthy and then go over his numbers. Yall trying to steal the thread with flurries....Sugar Ray Malta

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

How funny, another Malta response to me that's addressing Randle/Parker [USER=34]@Gil Scott-Heroin[/USER]


Like I said....take your L with some grace

I gave you multiple chances to own up to your lies, but all you did was not only deflect, but lie about something else too. If that's how you wanna play it, than that's cool. But don't get mad when I use the same tactics against you in the future.

 

[Newzz]

Malta then replied to that post of yours -

You just made that post like 45 minutes ago. Do you have bad memory or some shyt?

That's not even the same post

You're slightly switching your stance here....we NEVER argued if Randle should or shouldn't be one of the main playmakers/pieces. We argued that he IS while you and @Malta insisted he was just a garbage man and a 4th option. Maybe yall should listen to people who actually watch full Lakers games, game in/game out


I mean, the actual Head Coach of the Lakers is pushing the same issue we've argued over and over in here, but yall claim we're wrong......which means you're claiming he's wrong as well

Threads get upped everyday b


Randle & Parker both play tonight

1. "Bu-Bu-But...Emmanuel Mudiay can become just as good as John Wall": D'Loading vs Mudiay Thread Pt. 2

You ducked me, so since you only pick and choose which arguments you respond too....I will also from now on






2) You said:







Maybe initially you were arguing "potential", but you then switched in the same post and flat out predicted him to become just as good as Wall................and Im never letting you live that down

Explain what?


The fact I think you're lying in that post?


And, again, another example of you lying blantantly.......I didn't take ANYTHING out of your post. I posted your ridicoulous quote and added a in which you even quoted my post and all I had was a that came up AND there's no edits of my original post:








So why do you keep lying?



@Malta you running with a dude who compulsively lies like this and expect #LWO to keep playing by the rules?

It's 2 totally different posts that YOU'RE trying to group together.....but look stupid when it's already written on a message board and time stamped



I didn't accuse u initially of lying today, I responded to your accusations of ME lying on you....which, *gasps*, would be another lie you would've told & would you make a compulsive liar



I don't even know why Im arguing the usage of vocabulary with a guy who doesn't even know what the word "definitely" means

 

[Newzz]

I gave you multiple chances to own up to your lies, but all you did was not only deflect, but lie about something else too. If that's how you wanna play it, than that's cool. But don't get mad when I use the same tactics against you in the future.

You wrote the handbook. Remember this:

Nah it's common sense talk for you to STFU and stop speaking on players you don't watch. It's painful to see you fumbling through stats, acting like you know what you're talking about.

Troll response 101: When you cant admit you're wrong, dodge the topic at hand, and try and switch gears. Exhibit A...the post I just quoted above^^^



So, you didn't see the game huh?


You don't wanna go over context and all that shyt huh?


You don't wanna break down why Mudiay shot 9% from the field last night and scored 5 points?


And, fumbling through what stats?



I could've swore I've consistently and only pointed out the fact the Mudiay is an inefficient shooter from the floor


That's truth....no context is needed to see the nikka is inefficient as fukk, however, you call him John Wall 2.0 even to this day ignoring the fact that Wall has never been anywhere near as inefficient scoring the ball as Mudiay has been

^^^ Ironically, it was in response to ANOTHER one of your Troll jobs.....congratulations

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

That's not even the same post







It's 2 totally different posts that YOU'RE trying to group together.....but look stupid when it's already written on a message board and time stamped

You lied the first time when you accused me of saying I watched every game
You then lied when referencing a post of mine to back up what you said of me saying I watched every game, by intentionally taking out the sentence which clearly stated I didn't watch every game.
You then said you never accused me of lying in a post where you also tagged @Malta - when I just posted it clearly above.

Every step of the way you've lied.

So where was I accusing you of lying in this post where I tagged him?



Oh...another curious and ironic case of Gilly making up scenarios that didn't happen huh?

45 mins before -

@Malta you running with a dude who compulsively lies like this and expect #LWO to keep playing by the rules?

HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT YOU'RE LYING ALL UP IN HERE?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You wrote the handbook. Remember this:

And I'll say the exact same thing I said then -

The day that you start watching Nuggets games and provide sound reasoning behind your statements is the day I start taking you seriously, in regards to his play.

How do you expect to be taken seriously when you argue AGAINST players you don't even watch?

 

[Newzz]

*peeks in to see if this tag is going to be actually of Gil manning up and taking his L gracefully*

You lied the first time when you accused me of saying I watched every game
You then lied when referencing a post of mine to back up what you said of me saying I watched every game, by intentionally taking out the sentence which clearly stated I didn't watch every game.
You then said you never accused me of lying in a post where you also tagged @Malta - when I just posted it clearly above.

Every step of the way you've lied.


45 mins before -


HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT YOU'RE LYING ALL UP IN HERE?

*sees same ridiculous posts as before*

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@Newzz everybody can see the proof of you lying. But like I said, don't get mad if in the future I use your own tactics against you.

 

[Newzz]

And I'll say the exact same thing I said then -


How do you expect to be taken seriously when you argue AGAINST players you don't even watch?

That was last year...ironically last year to this date Since that time, I have acquired NBA League Pass thru TWC...and I make it a point to watch as many Parker & Mudiay games as possible (which is why Mudiay stans stand 0 chance this year), as well as my Lakers & Cavs, and any other top performers. I don't watch every single NBA game....Im lying about it just like @Gil Scott-Heroin



I watch the Knicks as well...but they aren't high priority for me. Too many games come on at the same time When Knicks are playing and it's a light schedule, I'll catch a few of their games. I think I've only seen them about 2 or 3x this year

You gonna take that L or nah?

 

[Newzz]

@Newzz everybody can see the proof of you lying. But like I said, don't get mad if in the future I use your own tactics against you.

Everyone knows you as a liar...which is why that's one of the things everyone calls you out on

Hopefully, the next time you skip town once the Warriors lose (and lie about it per the usual for you), you use the time to brush up on your usage of the English language, and learn the difference between "potentially" and "definitely"




#LWO

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You gonna take that L or nah?

I don't believe you for a second. Not only do you only post box scores all the time (if that wasn't a big enough hint) when discussing players, but you've lied all throughout this thread. You've displayed absolutely no knowledge in regards to Parker's nor Mudiay's play at all. All you do is post surface stats with no context.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Everyone knows you as a liar...which is why that's one of the things everyone calls you out on.

Nope, everyone doesn't call me out for lying. That's another lie.

Hopefully, next time you skip town once the Warriors lose (and lie about it per the usual for you)

Except I didn't skip town when the Warriors lost, I was here for a WHOLE month after the Finals finished. Oh look, another lie.