Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
I don't believe you for a second. Not only do you only post box scores all the time (if that wasn't a big enough hint) when discussing players, but you've lied all throughout this thread. You've displayed absolutely no knowledge in regards to Parker's nor Mudiay's play at all. All you do is post surface stats with no context.

:manny:

I don't need to go into detail on someone like Mudiay who's obviously not better than D'Angelo Russell to anyone who watches them play on a regular basis.....and even the surface stats can give a baby that info. There's no hidden "stats" or detail that will place Mudiay above Russell and your statement that he's can definitely become as good as John Wall shows you have jumped the shark in your "analysis" of players:mjlol:



As far as JaSorri Parker vs Randle? That's still an on going discussion and I haven't posted just surface stats. Only thing I believe Parker does better than Randle is shoot. That's it:manny: Randle is the better all-around player:ufdup:



JaSorri is Glenn Robinson 2.0 without the passing...Randle is a more athletic Anthony Mason.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
@Gil Scott-Heroin in my inbox???:dahell:



You're going too far now :camby:



If we gonna discuss something about sports, we gonna discuss it in the public's eye...............................................so I can bookmark it and use it for later:mjgrin:
 

Gil Scott-Heroin

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,236
Daps
241,436
I don't need to go into detail on someone like Mudiay who's obviously not better than D'Angelo Russell to anyone who watches them play on a regular basis.....and even the surface stats can give a baby that info. There's no hidden "stats" or detail that will place Mudiay above Russell and your statement that he's can definitely become as good as John Wall shows you have jumped the shark in your "analysis" of players:mjlol:
Except you don't watch the Nuggets on a regular basis. I highly doubt you've seen one game at all. I've always said that Mudiay had more potential than D'Angelo, and if you actually watched Mudiay play you'd see that this is a reasonable position to take. He lacks a lot of things at the moment, but his ability to get to the rim and vision is all there. Surface stats can't give you shyt if you don't know what's actually taking place on court.

You have a habit of just using box scores to value players you don't watch, and you've got yourself into trouble nearly every single time.
As far as JaSorri Parker vs Randle? That's still an on going discussion and I haven't posted just surface stats. Only thing Parker does better than Randle is shoot. That's it:manny: Randle is the better all-around player:ufdup:
All you've posted is surface stats. I haven't seen you post any info detailing Parker's play or anything about the Bucks as a whole. You're full of shyt and a liar.

:manny:
 

Gil Scott-Heroin

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,236
Daps
241,436
@Gil Scott-Heroin in my inbox???:dahell:



You're going too far now :camby:



If we gonna discuss something about sports, we gonna discuss it in the public's eye...............................................so I can bookmark it and use it for later:mjgrin:
I'm gonna be at your neck all the time now. That's what you get for lying and wasting my time. :manny:

I gave you multiple opportunities to stop lying and trolling, now the gloves are off. :manny:
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
Except you don't watch the Nuggets on a regular basis. I highly doubt you've seen one game at all. I've always said that Mudiay had more potential than D'Angelo, and if you actually watched Mudiay play you'd see that this is a reasonable position to take. He lacks a lot of things at the moment, but his ability to get to the rim and vision is all there. Surface stats can't give you shyt if you don't know what's actually taking place on court.

You have a habit of just using box scores to value players you don't watch, and you've got yourself into trouble nearly every single time.

All you've posted is surface stats. I haven't seen you post any info detailing Parker's play or anything about the Bucks as a whole. You're full of shyt and a liar.

:manny:
I'm gonna be at your neck all the time now. That's what you get for lying and wasting my time. :manny:

I gave you multiple opportunities to stop lying and trolling, now the gloves are off. :manny:
:mjlol:
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,153
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,335
Reppin
Los Angeles
Im sure you haven't....it's been nothing to talk about since we crushed yall's dreams all the way back in 2002:mjgrin:
Nah, the Kings peaked in 2004 when that fakkit Webber missed most of the season and they finally got to play the right way. Then he came back at the end of the year and crushed everyone's dreams.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
Nah, the Kings peaked in 2004 when that fakkit Webber missed most of the season and they finally got to play the right way. Then he came back at the end of the year and crushed everyone's dreams.

You always hated Webb...I still don't understand why breh:heh:


Him and Bibby on the pick n roll was :damn: for the Lakers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top