Do I? Well Wade was buried when had more hear than Miz and Punk..so forgive me for pointing out a political harbinger of bullshyt when I see one, drone.
Remember when you all were crying Daniel Magnum TA Bryan didn't headline WM against Brock?
- Thread starter Da King
- Start date
Do I? Well Wade was buried when had more hear than Miz and Punk..so forgive me for pointing out a political harbinger of bullshyt when I see one, drone.
WOAHMYGOODNESS
Your TSC World Champion
Frail
The Prince of All Saiyans
Formerly Jisoo Stan & @Twitter
that was actually disgustingThe irony in this post
when he's busy referencing house shows or some tramp putting on her best "performance" in some dvd he bought back in 2004..
Wasn't he already booked to be in that Cena spot at Summerslam as he was supposed to have the title and drop it as Summerslam??Neckbeards wanted him in that Cena slot for SummerSlam last year too.
The Wall Brother
All Star
That's correct. He was originally going to be the one squashed by Brock.Wasn't he already booked to be in that Cena spot at Summerslam as he was supposed to have the title and drop it as Summerslam??
And @Public Enemies
This thread kinda shytting on Magnum ain't it
Magnum's vertebrae pretty much 'exploded' in a car accident...
I fukk with Bryan but he was injured for awhile and kept putting it off....then is out but rushes back
This thread kinda shytting on Magnum ain't it
Magnum's vertebrae pretty much 'exploded' in a car accident...
I fukk with Bryan but he was injured for awhile and kept putting it off....then is out but rushes back
So its suspend disbelief when its Bryan vs Lesnar and think of all these ways he could wear Lesnar down. [WHILE NOTING THAT IT'S SCRIPTED OR FAKE]
But when reality set in and y'all realized it was gonna be Reigns. It was at least 3 different threads bytching about how Reign isn't realistic enough to beat Lesnar. How a superman punch and a spear isn't logical...
SO WHICH IS IT? IS IT FAKE AND WE'RE GONNA SUSPEND DISBELIEF? OR WE'RE GONNA KEEP BEING BIASED AND PICK AND CHOOSE WHEN ITS REALISTIC?
But when reality set in and y'all realized it was gonna be Reigns. It was at least 3 different threads bytching about how Reign isn't realistic enough to beat Lesnar. How a superman punch and a spear isn't logical...
SO WHICH IS IT? IS IT FAKE AND WE'RE GONNA SUSPEND DISBELIEF? OR WE'RE GONNA KEEP BEING BIASED AND PICK AND CHOOSE WHEN ITS REALISTIC?
TheGodling
Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Obviously the latter, it's the Mark way.
WOAHMYGOODNESS
Your TSC World Champion
If they just admit it was because they were butthurt that the indy darling they propped up became frail and ruined there dreams i could understand maybe
Beautiful Bobby Eatin
SWEEEEEEEEEETNESS!
Bryan had a long singles run and beat the guy who beat Brock so logically it made sense. Reigns at that point would have only beat Big Show. Theres suspending disbelief but you also have to do a proper build or it wont go over well. The bad ass Reigns we got in the Shield was the absolute BEST person to beat Brock. We didnt get that Reigns until wrestlemania. They screwed it up as much as the fans shyt on it tbh.
I havent been posting here for that long but people are seriously debating whether a match up is "realistic or not"? If it aint Spike Dudley against Yokozuna it aint that damn serious.
Match ups dont really mean a damn thing in this business. If a guy is booked to win all the time then it doesnt matter if he is pinning Brock, Big Show, or Ziggler, the fans are going to go with it because of the resume he has. Its the same reason why the average wrestler could do a DDT and nothing happens but Jake does it and kills the guy for the 3 count. Yall cant be serious with this
