Report: RGIII bragged about his influence over Dan Snyder

[NYC Rebel]

You're such a racist it's not even humorous. You should just embrace the shyt.

I can read the frustration in your lines because you yourself know you're full of bullshyt and are just dying for everyone to be racially motivated.

RG3 was a shytty player this year/ If he was playing right now, there wouldn't be this conversation. No one would be tearing him down. The fact his own players shytted on him, that tells you it's a lot bigger than some artificial media story

You caught me using cac for the first time. Congrats on announcing my belief in feeling somehow that I'm from a surprior racial stock compared to whites.

It's at the point now that I have to call you for what you are...a typical racist cac that plays this passive aggressive thing.

And I said nothing about this being racist bringing up John lacky. Last I heard....he is white...the part you didnt quote.

 

[LastEmperor2k2]

To me, RGIII is a cornball who is favored by the owner, so reports like these are not surprising.

Wow, you're using your common sense instead of leaning on a predisposed concept of universal racism in every facet of life, that seems like a good aproach.

Common sense tells anyone with a bran that Snyder saw RG3 as a cash cow, look at the jersey sales, ticket sales and fan response. The way they chanted his name as he entered the field in week 1.

Snyder knows where the money is, and the NFL being a business, and him being the bush league owner he is, it's clear to see he attached all has wagons to RG3's star.

Common sense is a valuable tool

 

[NYC Rebel]

Wow, you're using your common sense instead of leaning on a predisposed concept of universal racism in every facet of life, that seems like a good aproach.

Common sense tells anyone with a bran that Snyder saw RG3 as a cash cow, look at the jersey sales, ticket sales and fan response. The way they chanted his name as he entered the field in week 1.

Snyder knows where the money is, and the NFL being a business, and him being the bush league owner he is, it's clear to see he attached all has wagons to RG3's star.

Common sense is a valuable tool

It's been shown why this article is trash....yet here comes the shyt sports fan to defend it while saying he isn't

 

[LastEmperor2k2]

Then you have no point here. Your tacitly approving the article.

shyt journalism, shyt sports fans go hand and hand

shyt posters defending shyt performances for "Certain" reasons go hand in hand with the coli.

You're dumb ass is sitting over here tryna say 16 td/12int's and 22nd in the league in passer rating 29th in QBR is "Average".

It's obvious you were coming from a pretty misguided viewpoint to start, so why take anything that follows seriously?

"Average"

hahahahahaha

"Average"

Maybe this season was "average" for your Jets standard of QBing

 

[NYC Rebel]

shyt posters defending shyt performances for "Certain" reasons go hand in hand with the coli.

You're dumb ass is sitting over here tryna say 16 td/12int's and 22nd in the league in passer rating 29th in QBR is "Average".

It's obvious you were coming from a pretty misguided viewpoint to start, so why take anything that follows seriously?

"Average"

hahahahahaha

"Average"

Maybe this season was "average" for your Jets standard of QBing

I said he had an average year. Lets say I agree with you that he played bad...you win. It's beyond that. It's shyt journalism you're riding for because you're a shyt fan who feels that a played failures is an open invitation to write ethically questionable articles. What changes about that point? Absolutely nothing. You're not even arguing against that...you're focused on what I consider average or poor. Move past that. That has little To do with RGIII...has everything to do with today's sports world (John Lackey example) and people like you who make up ample part of it.

 

[NYC Rebel]

You're basically admitting to the double standard
To me, RGIII is a cornball who is favored by the owner, so reports like these are not surprising.

Still, the way some of these cats in here tore him down, with hundreds of others cosigning, makes their sudden outrage seem phony as fukk.

These reports are ethically questionable when facts are presented about the writer.

Why don't you confront what mastermind wrote? I forgot....RGIII being who he is opens the door where you can't question what any writer writes about them.

Man please. shyt journalism is alive and well because people like you don't question shyt. I can hate the Red Sox and still see the BS that floats in the press around a player because he's struggling.

That's why sports journalism is bottom barrell. Cats dig reports based on feelings.

 

[the next guy]

Cacs and c00ns, excuse thyself for some real talk,


I know the season 1 lovefest was gonna lead to cacs tearing this dude down piece by piece. It was too much praise. When whites praise a nikka too much, watch out! They building you up for a reason brehs.......

Sure but don't act like RG3 innocent in all this. Him and Shanahan are both messing up the Redskins organization.

 

[DirtyDee]

These reports are ethically questionable when facts are presented about the writer.

Why don't you confront what mastermind wrote? I forgot....RGIII being who he is opens the door where you can't question what any writer writes about them.

Man please. shyt journalism is alive and well because people like you don't question shyt. I can hate the Red Sox and still see the BS that floats in the press around a player because he's struggling.

That's why sports journalism is bottom barrell. Cats dig reports based on feelings.

Can't disagree with you about journalistic integrity being at an all-time low, but I'm merely pointing out the blatant double standard in here.

Basically, it's ok to assassinate another black man's character, his family and his physical appearance, you know, because we're all black.
However, when a white person writes an article about dude's questionable character that may/may not be conjecture, then it's a no-no.

IMO, a black person being defamed by their your own people is a lot more damaging/hurtful than when whites do it, because we *expect* white people to do it.

A c00n is as a c00n does.

 

[NYC Rebel]

Can't disagree with you about journalistic integrity being at an all-time low, but I'm merely pointing out the blatant double standard in here.

Basically, it's ok to assassinate another black man's character, his family and his physical appearance, you know, because we're all black.
However, when a white person writes an article about dude's questionable character that may/may not be conjecture, then it's a no-no.

IMO, a black person being defamed by their your own people is a lot more damaging/hurtful than when whites do it, because we *expect* white people to do it.

A c00n is as a c00n does.

Ain't no double standard. You can dislike RGIII and still question this article. It's called being a grown up.

 

[NYC Rebel]

Sure but don't act like RG3 innocent in all this. Him and Shanahan are both messing up the Redskins organization.

If an organization gives a player that much power, that org is at fault, not the player.

It's like blaming a child for running a household because the parents aren't doing their job.

 

[FTBS]

You're basically admitting to the double standard
To me, RGIII is a cornball who is favored by the owner, so reports like these are not surprising.

Still, the way some of these cats in here tore him down, with hundreds of others cosigning, makes their sudden outrage seem phony as fukk.

Of course there is a double standard. Why do people constantly feel the need to compare posters on a messageboard to paid professionals with degrees in journalism and bully pulpits. This is not the first time (and probably not the last) that someone has tried to make this leap. In addition to being and eduated professionals there are certian ethics that a journalist is expected to adhere to. So yes the standards for a journalist in terms of accuracy and not allowing personal feelings to overwhelm them are higher than the standards for the lay person in that regard. at people not getting this.

 

[DirtyDee]

Ain't no double standard. You can dislike RGIII and still question this article. It's called being a grown up.

It's called being "objective", and yes, you can question the article all day.
Just don't make it about race when his biggest critics/haters are black, and dwell in these forums.

 

[LastEmperor2k2]

Can't disagree with you about journalistic integrity being at an all-time low, but I'm merely pointing out the blatant double standard in here.

Basically, it's ok to assassinate another black man's character, his family and his physical appearance, you know, because we're all black.
However, when a white person writes an article about dude's questionable character that may/may not be conjecture, then it's a no-no.

IMO, a black person being defamed by their your own people is a lot more damaging/hurtful than when whites do it, because we *expect* white people to do it.

A c00n is as a c00n does.

That was my whole point.

Everyones up in arms now, because it's a white person writing something disparaging about RG3.

But this board has questioned his blackness, made appreciation threads for Rob Parker and shyt on the guy 24/7.

I aint even in here to talk about the article, I originally said what i`ve said way before this article, their relationship is questionable. But then I had to laugh at the faux outrage by the same people were making emoticons with actual corn with his braids on it.

 

[NYC Rebel]

It's called being "objective", and yes, you can question the article all day.
Just don't make it about race when his biggest critics/haters are black, and dwell in these forums.

I made it about race???

Where????

I brought up examples of players from all walks being effected by shyt journalism.

 

[K-Apps]

Remember when Deadspin posted my article catching Profootballtalk lying about McNabb being upset about the Vick signing?

word, I didn't know you wrote articles too