Researchers Find Textbook-Altering Link Between Brain, Immune System

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,443
Reputation
15,239
Daps
275,807
facial.jpg



:sas2:
 

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
367
Daps
17,297
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
@Napoleon Can you explain to me in layman terms how this discovery impacts vaccinations? Since vaccinations are generally for infant immune systems, do the anti-vac people have an argument that maybe we're negatively impacting the immune systems early on and this discovery would be the link for the various cases of autism etc.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,058
Daps
641,703
Reppin
The Deep State
Modern science continues to reinforce key tenets of ancient knowledge.
What the fukk are you talking about?

These people didn't know a goddamn thing about microscopic anatomical connections between layers of the brain.

Go fukk your self.

I'm sick and tired of you intellectually handicapped anti-science pieces of shyt polluting these serious threads when people like me REALLY do this shyt for a living
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,084
Daps
7,068
Reppin
NULL
This is rather flip
so there s a big difference between having components of an immune system (cellular and chemical) and having actual lymphatic vessels, medically this difference is significant diagnostically, therapeutically and in approaching the pathophysiolgy of brain diseases.

So no, they did not already know what this article is bringing to light, they have made an anatomical discovery of nobel proportions. There is no equivocating about anatomy, either you knew a feature was there or you did not, and we clearly did not know about cerebral lymphatic vessels.


this is not something one can say in 2015, our investigations in gross anatomy have been so thorough that if we did not know about it anatomically then we basically presumed it did not exist. And if we presumed that it did, every medical student from here to cali would be looking for it every semester.


again this is flip, it was always assumed that the support cells like glial cells and astrocytes in conjunction with cerebrospinal fluid (csf) filtration and excursion took care of neurocellular waste. The lymphatic system is used for interstitial fluid return and as an antigenic sampling ground, the brain assumedly had little homeostatic need for the former, because of the of the presumed role of the csf system; so it is not so obvious that the brain had to be connected to a lymphatic vessel.
Its not a flip, that is how you perceived it to be. I already explained why. I do agree "where" is the wrong word, but again I explained why its not something new meaning it isn't ground breaking in the brain having some type of connection to the lymphatic system. I already know why you, and Napoleon, don't like what Im trying to convey, its because it kills the dream of man being higher then nature. That is the main reason why these arguments continue.

Once you learn how something works, you don't have to necessarily know their physical connections, IF you are trying to heal something in the real world. It does help, but isn't needed. Now, if you want to have big dikk contest, the bullshyt continues. I write that because you are doing the same thing napoleon did, and that was basically write what I wrote, just in a different way.

For instance you wrote "medically this difference is significant diagnostically, therapeutically and in approaching the pathophysiolgy of brain diseases.". I already explained how you can deal with these diseases just based on the fact that we know the immune system, and brain is connected, and that means the lymphatic system is connected. The difference is you want a pill, I feel it can be that, and herb, based on knowing how it works, and how the body works.

Then you wrote "again this is flip, it was always assumed that the support cells like glial cells and astrocytes in conjunction with cerebrospinal fluid (csf) filtration and excursion took care of neurocellular waste. The lymphatic system is used for interstitial fluid return and as an antigenic sampling ground, the brain assumedly had little homeostatic need for the former, because of the of the presumed role of the csf system; so it is not so obvious that the brain had to be connected to a lymphatic vessel."

Have you thought maybe YOU presumed this, and those who think like you? You never felt the need to ask, "how does the body get rid of that waste?" That question alone could have let you see the connection. You never asked why is the gut, and skin, strongly connected with the lymphatic system? If you, and Napoleon, are so scientific, why didn't YOU ask these questions?

I felt since around 2006/2007 there was a connection because I used my OWN BRAIN, not just what I was taught or someone told me. Its called using your common sense, I was laughed at for thinking this, and boom now they find vessels, but if people used their brains, this wouldn't be so special beside the fact that it has been found.

Maybe I'm special, but I lived this shyt. I healed people, healed myself, and bettered myself just from using common sense and connecting what I learn. I remember I asked a doctor if estrogens from coffee may be fueling a cancer with someone I knew, and she looked at me like I was crazy. And what happens years down the line, research was showing that this may indeed may be the case. I did this the whole time while I was there, and saw how the doctors were getting offended, and twisting words around. This is why I'm not shocked you two are doing the same thing. I don't blame science, just egotistical people who can't take it when they either didn't know something, couldn't connect something to see what's going on, or they just want to be some know it all, and whoever disagrees with them, they get offended.

Its sad that people go to school for years, and can't do something so simple like use common sense.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,058
Daps
641,703
Reppin
The Deep State
@Napoleon Can you explain to me in layman terms how this discovery impacts vaccinations? Since vaccinations are generally for infant immune systems, do the anti-vac people have an argument that maybe we're negatively impacting the immune systems early on and this discovery would be the link for the various cases of autism etc.

They don't have an argument since the autism link was based on data Andrew Wakefield admittedly faked. There isn't even any connection.

Until shown, then you can't even make a suggestion.
 

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,443
Reputation
15,239
Daps
275,807
ANCIENT PEOPLE HAD NO CLUE OF A CONNECTION HOW NERVES EVEN WORKED.

do you have any evidence to bolster this claim or is your assertion based on someone saying "they'll have to change the books?"


:lupe:
 
Top