Restaurant refuses service to Christian group, citing staff ‘dignity’

[Nkrumah Was Right]

Is hating both sides neutral?

I’m on the black side - you think Farrakhan for example or any black non conformist gives a fukk about either side?

What is your response to Republican voter disenfranchisement, courting white nationalists like Fuentes etc?

Especially when African Americans are demographically outnumbered and don’t constitute a majority population in any state in the US?

 

[bnew]

Atheists are a hate group more than Christians. You guys stay whining and crying all day when nobody even brings you up.

what do atheists hate?

*note: Atheist = a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods

 

[Brehcepticon]

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

As long as they keep the same energy when the shoe is on the other foot, I don't have a problem.

Breh...they already do that. Masterpiece cakeshop, that clerk in Kentucky, the SCOTUS is hearing a case as we speak that would give religious groups freedom to discriminate.

Justice Jackson even brought up how the ruling could be used to allow discrimination against Black folk.

 

[Prodyson]

Tell this to Christians first

There are plenty of Christians that operate the same way. They just don’t get news articles written about them doing what they are supposed to do. How many Christians do you think own businesses? Now how often do you hear about Christians refusing service to people? Exactly. Just because it happens 3 or 4 times and people write think pieces about it doesn’t mean this is some prevalent issue.

 

[TEH]

What is your response to Republican voter disenfranchisement, courting white nationalists like Fuentes etc?

Especially when African Americans are demographically outnumbered and don’t constitute a majority population in any state in the US?

Is that a new goal post?

Let me be clear fukk both sides.

And if any candidate supports issues that helps AA specifically in an area or with a concern or in general as a whole then I’m for it. But I’m probably not going to agree with them on most other things.


But to ask me about whose side am I on racists or sodomites …? Really?

 

[The_Truth]

Breh...they already do that. Masterpiece cakeshop, that clerk in Kentucky, the SCOTUS is hearing a case as we speak that would give religious groups freedom to discriminate.

Justice Jackson even brought up how the ruling could be used to allow discrimination against Black folk.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm just saying there needs to be consistency.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

That isn't a 'dodge'. That's how things are right now. That's why the people trying to overturn the Government thought they were right, why people believe the Earth is flat, and why 'man' and 'woman' are debatable.

It's just going to get worse.​

Your framing for this is absolute shyt. You're lumping people with verified scientific fact in with people who are literally just spewing bullshyt opinions and calling them equal. Like come the fukk on

 

[Family Man]

I don't want to hear shyt the next time a bakery refuses to bake a cake for a homo couple. Or the next time an esthetician refuses to Brazilian wax some they/them nuts.

 

[Json]

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm just saying there needs to be consistency.

There is no consistency cause that’s not what these ultra conservatives want.

Same sentiment from the civil rights era. Opens black business..burn it down. Go to one of there white establishments you have to do my way by sitting in the back.

Basically they want the legal right to treat you like crap, but you have to respect them.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm just saying there needs to be consistency.

There won't be 'consistency' aside from math and most sciences. Everything else is based on opinion/feelings as the basis for knowledge is no longer grounded in any objective manner.​

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

I don't want to hear shyt the next time a bakery refuses to bake.

The court sided with the bakery, even liberal justices like Kagan...

 

[Prodyson]

That's precisely the point. They presented themselves as an organization wanting to do an event in the restaurant, not as individuals. There would've been no way for the restaurant to know about their opinions had they booked as any other regular group of individuals, but they booked as an organization who wanted to have one of their events there and who has made its agenda clear and public. The restaurant doesn't align itself with the political opinions of said group, so they can refuse to be associated with them. And yes, it is associating, all the group had to is put some pictures up and boom, now the restaurant is seen as a place where anti-LGBQT and anti-abortion groups are welcome.

I'm not 100% sure, but I'm pretty confident that anti-discrimination laws protect individuals, not organizations. Organizations de facto have a political agenda, AND they make it public beforehand. If you don't agree with said political agenda how can one force you to host that organization? And yes that goes both ways, I wouldn't expect say a church to agree to host a LGBQT meeting for example.

A restaurant is not associating itself simply by feeding people for money, unless they are advertising this event on their behalf. It’s not like they are sponsoring them or letting them use the space for free. However, I don’t know what type of event this was, but if they were in fact planning on putting up signage and things like that, then I’d be understanding. If this was an intimate gathering like a luncheon or holiday dinner or something, then this doesn’t make sense to me. For example, my job has holiday parties and often times rents out a restaurant. I’m sure they book it under the name of the company, but if you just walked in on the party you’d have no idea who it’s for or what we do. It’s just a holiday party. And that restaurant isn’t “associating” itself with us just because they let us have the party there. They don’t know us from Adam’s house cat, unless they were already knowledgeable about the company

 

[Family Man]

The court sided with the bakery, even liberal justices like Kagan...

That's good to know.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

Is that a new goal post?

Let me be clear fukk both sides.

And if any candidate supports issues that helps AA specifically in an area or with a concern or in general as a whole then I’m for it. But I’m probably not going to agree with them on most other things.


But to ask me about whose side am I on racists or sodomites …? Really?

Imagine just straight not caring about the foul shyt conservatives do to black folks

c00n behavior