The lie was claiming this made them propagandists somehow.Yeah, I have a problem with state sanctioned media efforts run in secret, you don't?
Article states it was confirmed by the spokesperson for the Reuters Foundation is that a lie?
News organizations shouldn't be promoting anything they should be reporting facts and they definitely shouldn't be doing it with a secret program in conjunction with British government. It's like as long as it's against Russia it's OK? That's not a principled journalistic argument.
And isn't the guy writing the story a long-time RT guy? And don't they try to deny that RT is a Russian propaganda effort? So doesn't that make it an actual state-run propaganda program done in secret, as opposed to this cultural exchange program to promote better journalistic standards?
Is your problem a news organization running a program to promote better standards of journalism, or just who they accepted funding from to do it?

