Rich Paul says new NCAA against him systemically targets minorities

goatmane

Veteran
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
16,589
Reputation
2,417
Daps
112,998



FREE TRIAL
Op-ed: Rich Paul on the NCAA’s new restrictions for player-agents

GettyImages-1130391933-1024x679.jpg

By Rich Paul 15m ago
Editor’s note: Below is an op-ed written by Rich Paul, who represents NBA players as the CEO and founder of Klutch Sports Group as well as the Head of Sports at United Talent Agency (UTA). Last week the NCAA released a memo identifying new criteria for agents to be eligible to represent collegiate athletes considering the NBA draft early, notably the requirement of a bachelor’s degree. It was quickly referred to as “The Rich Paul Rule” because it would prevent agents like Paul, who chose to forgo college, from representing student athletes not finished with school that are considering the NBA draft without compromising their eligibility.

Last week the NCAA added new criteria for agents who wanted to work with “student-athletes.” They must pass a test, have three years of experience, and have completed their college degree. The media is calling it “The Rich Paul Rule” that, while incredibly flattering, is not accurate. It has no impact on me or the business of Klutch Sports Group. However, it does have a significant impact on people like me and the NCAA should be called out for it.

To be honest, I have no idea whether the NCAA adopted the new rule specifically because of my work with Darius Bazley, as people have speculated, or if it is because they know there are more and more people like me fighting for their chance and challenging this antiquated system.

The harmful consequences of this decision will ricochet onto others who are trying to break in. NCAA executives are once again preventing young people from less prestigious backgrounds, and often people of color, from working in the system they continue to control. In this case, the people being locked out are kids who aspire to be an agent and work in the NBA and do not have the resources, opportunity, or desire to get a four-year degree.

I actually support requiring three years of experience before representing a kid testing the market. I can even get behind passing a test. However, requiring a four-year degree accomplishes only one thing — systematically excluding those who come from a world where college is unrealistic.

Does anyone really believe a four-year degree is what separates an ethical person from a con artist?

Let’s also be clear that once the NCAA requires a four-year degree for athletes “testing the waters,” it’s only a matter of time until this idea is socialized, no longer questioned, and then more broadly applied. We all know how this works. Unfair policy is introduced incrementally so people accept it because it only affects a small group. Then the unfair policy quietly evolves into institutional policy. I’m not sure what the technical term is for that because I didn’t finish college but I know it when I see it.

There are certainly other ways to achieve that goal which don’t lock people out of the system. Why don’t they partner with universities on a one-year program for agents who don’t meet their requirements but want to learn the business? Or work with existing agents who play by the rules to help mentor those who are trying to “break in?”

There’s another practical reason that this rule doesn’t make sense. Respectfully, how do four years studying sports marketing in a classroom make you more qualified to represent a kid than working at Klutch Sports Group or for an NBA front office; or at any other entrepreneurial business for that matter? All this will do is exclude the agents whose life experience helps them understand the needs of many of these players best.

The barriers to entry for the next Rich Paul are already high enough. When I travel back to neighborhoods like the inner city of Greater Cleveland where I’m from, young black kids tell me that they see my career as another path for them out of their troubled surroundings. They want to grow up to do what I do. That inspires me. So if the NCAA is invested both in helping young people get the education they need and in supporting student-athletes, like they claim, then we are on common ground.

No matter the result what I’m focused on is helping aspiring agents and players figure out the best path forward for them so they can earn a living and be blessed with opportunities like I have. Hopefully, the NCAA will help foster a system that will allow for that as well.

But no matter what the NCAA does, I want young men and women no matter their color or background to know that this shouldn’t discourage them from aspiring to be in this profession. Continue to strive for greatness, the marathon of life will continue. #MoreThanAnAgent
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-539
Daps
15,337
Reppin
WestMidWest
I actually support requiring three years of experience before representing a kid testing the market. I can even get behind passing a test. However, requiring a four-year degree accomplishes only one thing — systematically excluding those who come from a world where college is unrealistic.
I thought he was gonna be against all the requirements but is targeting only the in-class/online education part, during the innanet era?:patrice:even unionized trades require apprentice in-class work to complement field work
 

krazykid18

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
6,583
Reputation
-1,271
Daps
19,212
Reppin
NULL





Let’s also be clear that once the NCAA requires a four-year degree for athletes “testing the waters,” it’s only a matter of time until this idea is socialized, no longer questioned, and then more broadly applied. We all know how this works. Unfair policy is introduced incrementally so people accept it because it only affects a small group. Then the unfair policy quietly evolves into institutional policy. I’m not sure what the technical term is for that because I didn’t finish college but I know it when I see it.

#MoreThanAnAgent


The bold makes no sense .. i hope he means 4 year degree for agents representing athletes "testing the waters"
 

L. Deezy

Veteran
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
36,032
Reputation
4,356
Daps
79,470
lmao....

its the Rich Paul rule and it TARGETS HIM.

list of agents is public record nyggas. All of them have degrees

first muthafukka on this list is black with a degree. its a bunch of black agents on this list.


Certified Agent Directory - National Basketball Players Association









Rich Paul is not likeable. point blank. Its not a black and minority thing. its a Paul thing

I shed not one tear.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
49,278
Reputation
11,160
Daps
346,354
Reppin
CHICAGO
The media is calling it “The Rich Paul Rule” that, while incredibly flattering, is not accurate. It has no impact on me or the business of Klutch Sports Group
ALL THAT NEEDS TO BE SAID...
AND HEY RICH BRON ISNT A PART OF THE MEDIA...



I actually support requiring three years of experience before representing a kid testing the market. I can even get behind passing a test.

THIS IS ACTUALLY TOUGHER TO ACCOMPLISH
THAN A 4 YR DEGREE IDIOTS.

MANY PLAYERS FAMILY MEMBERS
AND ASSOCIATES HAVE 4 YR DEGREES.

HOW MANY HAVE 3 YRS EXPERIENCE AS AN AGENT?

IM GLAD THIS IS PUT TO BED NOW.
:devil:
:evil:

 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,208
Reputation
2,360
Daps
33,768
Reppin
Philly
LOL How can you complain? Of course they're gonna tweak it to require you to have a degree. You can't work for a university without one, even the coaches have degrees, so why would they allow you to work with their kids without one? Their goal is to promote the (perceived) long-term benefits of the college experience. All he would have to do is have one of his Agents WITH a degree do it.
 
Top