Richard Dawkins Supports Eugenics

Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
7,099
Reputation
843
Daps
18,145
We did eugenics on animals for HUMAN benefit only to introduce suffering into those animals. They suffer for another at their own expense. So yes it “works” for us, but what about their accordance with nature?

You could argue the shyt they did to us was Proto-eugenics and this fool is talking about “on paper though”

If you’re a conspiracy breh you could argue this eugenics is still going on, to keep people poor, ignorant and political slaves

Humans cannot be trusted with playing God.
At the bolded part - This right here. People tend to forget about the genetic conditions that many domesticated animals suffer from.
Sure domesticated animals are useful to us. However, at what point does that domestication becomes a hindrance not just to the animal but to us?
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reputation
24,689
Daps
288,897
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
@Matt504
UDCAcf1.png
 

⠝⠕⠏⠑

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
21,950
Reputation
26,530
Daps
116,811
If eugenics was done on a purely objective basis then wouldnt greater amounts of melanin be preferred to protect against the sun and whatnot?
Not only that but if we based support for eugenics on the ethnic/racial group who has systemically caused the most death, rape, torture, and abuse of nearly every other group of people on the planet...then things start lookin REEEEAAAALLL funny in the white.
Holocaust, transatlantic slave trade, opium wars, genocides during Scramble for Africa, genocides of indigenous peoples across the world, Jim Crow, Christopher Columbus...colonization, current child sex slave trade...

I would think as much damage as white people have done to the entire planet, they’d wanna sip that STFU juice and pipe down when it comes to neck-yappin about getting rid of the worst genetic common denominator.
:sas2:
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,580
Reputation
2,566
Daps
47,913
Reppin
.0001%
pits clear as day eugenics and this over populated talk is reserved and code language for nonwhite faces.

funny how cacs complain about that but contradict themselves by worrying about the lack of the white birthrate. Pretty much showing you what the deal is

Yep
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
6,885
Reputation
384
Daps
30,095
In every community or corner of the world, the fittest/healthiest/sharpest men should do the majority of the multiplying

Cacs, as per usual, had to ruin the concept and make it racial when in reality someone like Russell Wilson or LeBron is far more qualified to have many children than blonde hair, blue eyed Eminem

If you want to see what a society looks like with NO natural selection then look at India. Thanks to arranged marriage, every man has the ability to pass his genes on
 
Last edited:

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,580
Reputation
2,566
Daps
47,913
Reppin
.0001%
Not only that but if we based support for eugenics on the ethnic/racial group who has systemically caused the most death, rape, torture, and abuse of nearly every other group of people on the planet...then things start lookin REEEEAAAALLL funny in the white.
Holocaust, transatlantic slave trade, opium wars, genocides during Scramble for Africa, genocides of indigenous peoples across the world, Jim Crow, Christopher Columbus...colonization, current child sex slave trade...

I would think as much damage as white people have done to the entire planet, they’d wanna sip that STFU juice and pipe down when it comes to neck-yappin about getting rid of the worst genetic common denominator.
:sas2:

Their not gonna sip that stfu juice until it's way past the point where it even matter :pachaha:
 
Top