yeah im not an eagles fan but they arent aFukk George Bush, butwith that Eagles slander.

How the Philadelphia Eagles became the NFL's wokest team
yeah im not an eagles fan but they arent aFukk George Bush, butwith that Eagles slander.
Not being ironic at all. I wouldn’t vote for him but his foreign policy record is far from the worst and decent by Republican standards.Are you being ironic?
What the fukk is with y’all trying to give props to HW Bush?
He was in charge of the CIA during the time when it was known they sold crack to inner cities. He and his neocon buddies are responsible for the explosion in the private prison system. Invading Kuwait and jumpstarting America’s imperialist policies in the Middle East isn’t something you should be applauding either.
Some of you ignorant c*nts make me sick with how little you know about America’s history. This shyt happened less than 40 years ago.
What the fukk are you talking about?Not being ironic at all. I wouldn’t vote for him but his foreign policy record is far from the worst and decent by Republican standards.
-The Gulf War was supported by the UN, the entire region, and thad a coalition so broad it even included Assad’s father
-He showed pragmatism in his dealings with Gorbachev and did well with the unification of Germany
-His arms control deals with the Russians were a net positive anyway you look at it
- As far as American Presidents go, he was relatively more even-handed on Israel/Palestine. He took a tougher stance on status of Jerusalem and on settlements than his successors.
imagine saying rest in peace to a piece of shyt like thisNegable thread![]()
every president did positive things, it's impossible not to. even agent orangeHe actually did some positive things this is the coli though
![]()
Yeah the war on drugs which basically destroyed the black community was sure positive.He actually did some positive things this is the coli though
![]()
Yeah the war on drugs which basically destroyed the black community was sure positive.
the only semi decent republican president since eisenhower. so RIP
gulf war i mainly just give credit to the fact his admin. didnt try to invade iraq after expelling republican guard from kuwait. the actual foreign policy of hw bush on iraq is pretty bad considering his role in supporting both sides of iran-iraq in the 80s. his admin then encouraged a rebellion in iraq AFTER desert storm that they then failed to support at all. DoD and the military handled combat in desert storm well.Not being ironic at all. I wouldn’t vote for him but his foreign policy record is far from the worst and decent by Republican standards.
-The Gulf War was supported by the UN, the entire region, and thad a coalition so broad it even included Assad’s father
-He showed pragmatism in his dealings with Gorbachev and did well with the unification of Germany
-His arms control deals with the Russians were a net positive anyway you look at it
- As far as American Presidents go, he was relatively more even-handed on Israel/Palestine. He took a tougher stance on status of Jerusalem and on settlements than his successors.
Disagree with this framing, he had a lot of influence on the nature of how the war was pursued (broad regional coalition, and broad UN mandate) both things were key objectives for him and his advisors, the most influential of whom were not neo-cons but prominent realists. Same goes with how they gave DoD a lot of latitude on planning - don’t think it was a coincidence or luck, but a reflection of how he and his advisers pursued FP decision making.gulf war i mainly just give credit to the fact his admin. didnt try to invade iraq after expelling republican guard from kuwait. the actual foreign policy of hw bush on iraq is pretty bad considering his role in supporting both sides of iran-iraq in the 80s. his admin then encouraged a rebellion in iraq AFTER desert storm that they then failed to support at all. DoD and the military handled combat in desert storm well.
the russian arms control deals were clearly very good for both sides and you would have to be an insane neocon to not want to sign them. a lot of this stuff is just things bush couldve messed up badly by getting too involved in but didnt, not things he heavily influenced through great statecraft and policy.
edit: want to add that now that im thinking about it, he was probably president at a better time for american power in the world in the last 50 years. in the optimistic period between the end of the cold war and the start of the yugoslav wars, then the war on terror.