Robert F. Kennedy JR exposes Bill Gates and his vaccines and experimenting on people

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

lmao WHO articles you need to look where your stats are coming from, if the vaccine makers tell you they’re safe they must be.

The stats are objectively verifiable as each Nation submits data to WHO. It is the consensus of 100's of Nations that vaccines are safe......​

Data, statistics and graphics​

Most of the data compiled on these pages is derived from official reports by WHO Member States and unless otherwise stated, data is reported annually through the WHO/UNICEF joint reporting process.

Information is available by WHO Member State, as well as summarized by WHO Region and on a global level. It is also broken down and available by subject.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Department of Health | Communicable Disease Service | Immunization Requirements

https://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/documents/cc_preschool_requirements-parents.pdf
https://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/documents/k12-parents.pdf

Laughably incorrect.

I count 7-8. Same thing I've stated several times.​

​

 

[GiantGonzalez]

The stats are objectively verifiable as each Nation submits data to WHO. It is the consensus of 100's of Nations that vaccines are safe......​

Data, statistics and graphics​

​

Buy my drugs breh! They’re safe I checked them myself

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Buy my drugs breh! They’re safe I checked them myself

Each of the Nations at this link checked them......​

WHO vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system. 2019 global summary​

Click the button to enable a pop-up list so you can choose which Nation's records to review from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe.

​

 

[Tommy Lee Jones]

It's still fukk bill gates and anyone that loves him

 

[Danie84]

And, now his loved-ones mysteriously drowns under ridiculous circumstances

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

'Bu-bu-but you can't prove vaccines save lives.....'​

​

 

[satam55]

 

[Treason]

27 minutes of anti-vaxxer ether....​

​

​

fukk a john oliver

 

[Houston911]

.....

 

[Budda]

World leaders and philanthropic funders in general aren't scientists, they hire scientists.




And that's valid. I don't think of Gates as the next George Soros boogeyman figure like some making him out to be, but he has a massive pro-tech pro-wealth pro-pharmaceuticals bias and I'm not certain he does more good than harm.

Problem is that I don't trust Robert F. Kennedy at all either. Just too much nonsense.

Doesn’t sound like nonsense to me, wait how are you poster of the year?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Doesn’t sound like nonsense to me, wait how are you poster of the year?

Because I post quality content. See how you just wasted an entire comment without contributing anything to the conversation at all? I don't do that.

Consider that your first lesson. Do better. If you can actually describe the basis of your beliefs, then maybe people will learn something. Or correct you. Either way, try to actually get somewhere.

 

[Budda]

Because I post quality content. See how you just wasted an entire comment without contributing anything to the conversation at all? I don't do that.

Consider that your first lesson. Do better. If you can actually describe the basis of your beliefs, then maybe people will learn something. Or correct you. Either way, try to actually get somewhere.

You’ve done the exact same thing, I didn’t learn anything from reading what you just posted?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

You’ve done the exact same thing, I didn’t learn anything from reading what you just posted?

I tried to help you. If you're just here to troll, that's on you. Why even take the time to type, "I disagree!" without adding any content at all?

Like I said, include content and the conversation can get somewhere. If you just telling me how you feel about me with zero content, you're wasting time. There's a reason you been here 7 years and have basically zero rep. Folk rep folk when they feel like they've learned something.

That should answer your original question.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

IG/Twitter posts of anonymous opinions don't exactly mean anything. Why can't any of them prove there's some 'conspiracy' with actual evidence aside from emotional assertions and conjecture?​