Poppa_Dock
:gladlebron:
By asserting that Africa NEEDs white people to succeed, you imply whites are necessary and integral for blacks to succeed. It is bullshyt to assert such when evidence today--in several African and Asian nations--already shows this is not true.
No, Africa just needs education and business, which is what they are getting. The Chinese did not "steal" anything from cacs; they built their society on their own and by selling to cacs.
There is already black-owned telecommunications and business giants in Africa. And there are already militaries (which can always improve). This goes doubly so for Asia.If black people want to improve those things, cacs owning land and being involved with blacks isn't necessary. Blacks need only open business and trade links like the Asians do. Cacs need to learn to respet blacks the same way cacs respect themselves and Asians.
Your convinced im saying black people/asians are stpuid. Im saying, africa, asia etc. needs europe/cacs/whites whatever
Europe needs africans and asians
The fact that europeans introduced some of these things to whoever whoever is the point, which was answering the notion that "africa doesn't needs cacs" responding to the orginal post, and the reality is africa has benefited from lots of the relationships with europeans or asians whoever. The idea that africa, zimbabwe specifically is somehow better off because it is isolated, lost a lot of its ecomony etc. when lots of the farmers he kicked out went to places like Zambia and improved their shyt at a complete embarrassing loss to Zimbabwe. Asians benefitted alot from european friendship, China won't tell you that, but China also thinks you can cure disease with animal dikks, they love that WOO WOO nonsense, an astonishing amount of their stuff has been ripped off from others. They are in zimbabwe right now working africans as slaves for minerals
. They are brownish though so everybody like 
) or Belgium for that matter, and you just proved it 