this was interesting to say the least. the cac claims he's not about white supremacy in the beginning, he just believes in exclusion. then towards the very end, he admits whites are about triumph, and they don't believe in sharing power--which is the point. whites want to maintain their power and authority over others indefinitely. that's why they're so fukking scared and angry. although the stats really don't prove a shift in wealth or power, the idea of becoming a minority sends them into a frenzy.
Roland Martin Asks a white supremacist "Why are you so Angry?"
- Thread starter Doobie Doo
- Start date
CashmereThoughts
Veteran
Wow.
Dude is remedial in his arguements and speaks like a homo
Dude is remedial in his arguements and speaks like a homo
Like I always said...I have no respect for white supremacist because their worst of the worst are soft as baby shyt 
You get locked up and be around a lot of em with the swatiskas, thunderbolts, spider web elbow tattoos, all that good ass white supremacist, I mean "alt-right"
shyt in institutions ran by them in towns ran by them. vandalia "klandalia", pickneyville, menard, Pontiac, etc.... And these fakkits will not even look in your eyes and be humble as shyt. Never a "******" this or that and this y'all worst of the worst 
I can't respect or honor em in any aspect...they're cowards but online and subtly in position of power they'll make moves which some will argue is all the matters but at the end of the day a sissy as snake is a snake.
If you really hate us/me that much then act like it instead of bytchin then doin it behind the scenes or where you have institutions behind your back.
Summed up: none of this is surprising because white supremacists are some of the most entitled, bytch made, spoiled, pussies on this planet earth on god. Can't even debate in interviews without takin a L
You get locked up and be around a lot of em with the swatiskas, thunderbolts, spider web elbow tattoos, all that good ass white supremacist, I mean "alt-right"
shyt in institutions ran by them in towns ran by them. vandalia "klandalia", pickneyville, menard, Pontiac, etc.... And these fakkits will not even look in your eyes and be humble as shyt. Never a "******" this or that and this y'all worst of the worst I can't respect or honor em in any aspect...they're cowards but online and subtly in position of power they'll make moves which some will argue is all the matters but at the end of the day a sissy as snake is a snake.
If you really hate us/me that much then act like it instead of bytchin then doin it behind the scenes or where you have institutions behind your back.
Summed up: none of this is surprising because white supremacists are some of the most entitled, bytch made, spoiled, pussies on this planet earth on god. Can't even debate in interviews without takin a L
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Anytime I hear a white supremacist speak i know im being lied to. He told a bold face lie about Cotton not being important. Cotton and slavery was the backbone of the American economy.
The Role Cotton Played in the 1800s Economy | African American History Blog | The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross
Why Was Cotton ‘King’?
The most commonly used phrase describing the growth of the American economy in the 1830s and 1840s was “Cotton Is King.” We think of this slogan today as describing the plantation economy of the slavery states in the Deep South, which led to the creation of “the second Middle Passage.” But it is important to understand that this was not simply a Southern phenomenon. Cotton was one of the world’s first luxury commodities, after sugar and tobacco, and was also the commodity whose production most dramatically turned millions of black human beings in the United States themselves into commodities. Cotton became the first mass consumer commodity.
Understanding both how extraordinarily profitable cotton was and how interconnected and overlapping were the economies of the cotton plantation, the Northern banking industry, New England textile factories and a huge proportion of the economy of Great Britain helps us to understand why it was something of a miracle that slavery was finally abolished in this country at all.
Let me try to break this down quickly, since it is so fascinating:
Let’s start with the value of the slave population. Steven Deyle shows that in 1860, the value of the slaves was “roughly three times greater than the total amount invested in banks,” and it was “equal to about seven times the total value of all currency in circulation in the country, three times the value of the entire livestock population, twelve times the value of the entire U.S. cotton crop and forty-eight times the total expenditure of the federal government that year.” As mentioned here in a previous column, the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased the productivity of cotton harvesting by slaves. This resulted in dramatically higher profits for planters, which in turn led to a seemingly insatiable increase in the demand for more slaves, in a savage, brutal and vicious cycle.
Now, the value of cotton: Slave-produced cotton “brought commercial ascendancy to New York City, was the driving force for territorial expansion in the Old Southwest and fostered trade between Europe and the United States,” according to Gene Dattel. In fact, cotton productivity, no doubt due to the sharecropping system that replaced slavery, remained central to the American economy for a very long time: “Cotton was the leading American export from 1803 to 1937.”
What did cotton production and slavery have to do with Great Britain? The figures are astonishing. As Dattel explains: “Britain, the most powerful nation in the world, relied on slave-produced American cotton for over 80 per cent of its essential industrial raw material. English textile mills accounted for 40 percent of Britain’s exports. One-fifth of Britain’s twenty-two million people were directly or indirectly involved with cotton textiles.”
“First cotton gin” from Harpers Weekly. 1869 illustration depicting event of some 70 years earlier by William L. Sheppard. (Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs division)
And, finally, New England? As Ronald Bailey shows, cotton fed the textile revolution in the United States. “In 1860, for example, New England had 52 percent of the manufacturing establishments and 75 percent of the 5.14 million spindles in operation,” he explains. The same goes for looms. In fact, Massachusetts “alone had 30 percent of all spindles, and Rhode Island another 18 percent.” Most impressively of all, “New England mills consumed 283.7 million pounds of cotton, or 67 percent of the 422.6 million pounds of cotton used by U.S. mills in 1860.” In other words, on the eve of the Civil War, New England’s economy, so fundamentally dependent upon the textile industry, was inextricably intertwined, as Bailey puts it, “to the labor of black people working as slaves in the U.S. South.”
If there was one ultimate cause of the Civil War, it was King Cotton — black-slave-grown cotton — “the most important determinant of American history in the nineteenth century,” Dattel concludes. “Cotton prolonged America’s most serious social tragedy, slavery, and slave-produced cotton caused the American Civil War.” And that is why it was something of a miracle that even the New England states joined the war to end slavery.
Once we understand the paramount economic importance of cotton to the economies of the United States and Great Britain, we can begin to appreciate the enormity of the achievements of the black and white abolitionists who managed to marshal moral support for the abolition of slavery, as well as those half a million slaves who “marched with their feet” and fled to Union lines as soon as they could following the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation
The Role Cotton Played in the 1800s Economy | African American History Blog | The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross
Why Was Cotton ‘King’?
The most commonly used phrase describing the growth of the American economy in the 1830s and 1840s was “Cotton Is King.” We think of this slogan today as describing the plantation economy of the slavery states in the Deep South, which led to the creation of “the second Middle Passage.” But it is important to understand that this was not simply a Southern phenomenon. Cotton was one of the world’s first luxury commodities, after sugar and tobacco, and was also the commodity whose production most dramatically turned millions of black human beings in the United States themselves into commodities. Cotton became the first mass consumer commodity.
Understanding both how extraordinarily profitable cotton was and how interconnected and overlapping were the economies of the cotton plantation, the Northern banking industry, New England textile factories and a huge proportion of the economy of Great Britain helps us to understand why it was something of a miracle that slavery was finally abolished in this country at all.
Let me try to break this down quickly, since it is so fascinating:
Let’s start with the value of the slave population. Steven Deyle shows that in 1860, the value of the slaves was “roughly three times greater than the total amount invested in banks,” and it was “equal to about seven times the total value of all currency in circulation in the country, three times the value of the entire livestock population, twelve times the value of the entire U.S. cotton crop and forty-eight times the total expenditure of the federal government that year.” As mentioned here in a previous column, the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased the productivity of cotton harvesting by slaves. This resulted in dramatically higher profits for planters, which in turn led to a seemingly insatiable increase in the demand for more slaves, in a savage, brutal and vicious cycle.
Now, the value of cotton: Slave-produced cotton “brought commercial ascendancy to New York City, was the driving force for territorial expansion in the Old Southwest and fostered trade between Europe and the United States,” according to Gene Dattel. In fact, cotton productivity, no doubt due to the sharecropping system that replaced slavery, remained central to the American economy for a very long time: “Cotton was the leading American export from 1803 to 1937.”
What did cotton production and slavery have to do with Great Britain? The figures are astonishing. As Dattel explains: “Britain, the most powerful nation in the world, relied on slave-produced American cotton for over 80 per cent of its essential industrial raw material. English textile mills accounted for 40 percent of Britain’s exports. One-fifth of Britain’s twenty-two million people were directly or indirectly involved with cotton textiles.”
“First cotton gin” from Harpers Weekly. 1869 illustration depicting event of some 70 years earlier by William L. Sheppard. (Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs division)
And, finally, New England? As Ronald Bailey shows, cotton fed the textile revolution in the United States. “In 1860, for example, New England had 52 percent of the manufacturing establishments and 75 percent of the 5.14 million spindles in operation,” he explains. The same goes for looms. In fact, Massachusetts “alone had 30 percent of all spindles, and Rhode Island another 18 percent.” Most impressively of all, “New England mills consumed 283.7 million pounds of cotton, or 67 percent of the 422.6 million pounds of cotton used by U.S. mills in 1860.” In other words, on the eve of the Civil War, New England’s economy, so fundamentally dependent upon the textile industry, was inextricably intertwined, as Bailey puts it, “to the labor of black people working as slaves in the U.S. South.”
If there was one ultimate cause of the Civil War, it was King Cotton — black-slave-grown cotton — “the most important determinant of American history in the nineteenth century,” Dattel concludes. “Cotton prolonged America’s most serious social tragedy, slavery, and slave-produced cotton caused the American Civil War.” And that is why it was something of a miracle that even the New England states joined the war to end slavery.
Once we understand the paramount economic importance of cotton to the economies of the United States and Great Britain, we can begin to appreciate the enormity of the achievements of the black and white abolitionists who managed to marshal moral support for the abolition of slavery, as well as those half a million slaves who “marched with their feet” and fled to Union lines as soon as they could following the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation
They want to keep the rewards that slavery and colonialism created yet separate themselves from the idea that the winners were/are genetically and gleefully wicked.
That's like saying... "I abhor murderers... But... Since you have been murdered, let me gon' head and sell your organs... What? I didn't kill you."
this is why white supremacist cant have honest dialogue. i'm certain in the back of his head, he's thinking "oh yes, you are
", but they'll never outright say it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,422
- Reputation
- 3,705
- Daps
- 152,129
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
Exactly. Just like Hitler and his cronies. Bunch of racist delusional homos.
Power is in violence. Think about the scene in the The Dark Knight Rises with Bain and the dude who caused Bruce Wayne's shares to fall. He started to flex money as if it gave him power over Bain. Bain imposed his physical will over dude and asked do he feel powerful or in control.
Indeed an those immigrants are shytting on black people too.
Damn immigrant gonna tell me "Black people lazy as shyt, I came here with nothing and I own a business"...Your ASS wouldn't be here if it wasn't for blacks on the front line demanding equal rights for people of color. Our war isn't with just whites, it's with everyone. We aren't blameless but got dayum we getting shytted on from every direction.
This makes no sense. He needed to get schooled by an educated person. He needed his warped thinking challenged by someone who actually knew what they were talking about. Richard is very educated but no amount of education could make his logic right. He sounded stupid because his reasoning and excuses are stupid.
Fox News interviews people like the woman who, I don't know her background because they don't want to be challenged and when they do have someone who can or is challenging their rhetoric they just try to yell and over talk them.
Work together, keep our money together, and it wont matter who is coming or going. Closing the borders and keeping 'immigrants' out is a white supremacist ideology