'sad' and 'angry' daps should count as negative daps // website latency/archival post suggestions

jensyao

Collector
Joined
Apr 8, 2021
Messages
3,041
Reputation
2,843
Daps
5,575
Reppin
Schooling people takes forever; don't bother
if someone reacts with negative sentiment on your post, shouldn't dap count go down like rep? some people out here are dap farming by making more controversial posts that would invoke more 'sad' and 'angry' daps because some trolls found out that it's easier if they specialize towards that type of content while farming for overall dap count in account stats padding and overall trolling behavior that would invoke more bushed content

if neg wars are being restricted by having to rep 25 people before you can rep the same person again, shouldn't dap farm posts and replies also be restricted if the website itself lags from generating new posts and superfluous traffic involving blatant shyt posting, and also free up mod tickets? (this also involves alt accounts replying to main accounts' posts within a couple of minutes from each other from the same IP address for more sophisticated alley-oop dap-farming techniques -- idk why we haven't banned people and restricted them from logging into two accounts consistently if IP addressed could be easily checked and traced on all devices for 100% matches if it's consistently the same person in the same web session and not someone else different from the same household but from a different web session and web visitation times...also, why aren't previously banned members also IP banned if they always come back during open registration for another round of relentless disruption? banned members should be IP banned from even loading up the forum, where the list of commonly spoofed VPN IP addressed could be easily found and also blocked to prevent all these lurker guest weirdos from slowing down the website all the time).

As the number of posts and users increase on this forum, the forum becomes more expensive to scale monetarily in storage, bandwidth, and latency -- shouldn't there be an automatic archival/sunset/deletion system on the forum for posts that never got any replies, daps, reps, or overall views/interactions to speed up network traffic to load up lesser posts in the number of pages that forum has accumulated, as well as prevent these archived posts to be searchable long-term in the search results for faster website latency? (this would also include stored media that were never used more than a couple times with rare use-cases -- all stored media including smileys could be outsourced to other free image hosting platforms). This would also reduce storage space if the archived posts are compressed as view-only, text-only with lesser fancy GUI load-up, all unraveled media embeds could be converted back into simple links, and non-repliable after a certain number of years of overall inactivity, under a certain view-count rate threshold.

Shouldn't the forum website restrict some bots and internet web crawlers from scraping the site too often for whatever intentions that they might have (especially these new-age vigilante bot web scrapers that take forum sentiments to predict overall stock interest and gauge crypto hype) with a better prevention system with like a more restrictively written robots.txt file (that could be easily copied over and templated after another website like amazon, etc) or with like a ddos/cloudflare bot captcha catcher-system during the site's peak hours to prevent overall site lag? These are considerations, thanks

 
Last edited:

drederick tatum

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
5,422
Reputation
2,342
Daps
18,167
Reppin
Chicago
if someone reacts with negative sentiment on your post, shouldn't dap count go down like rep? some people out here are dap farming by making more controversial posts that would invoke more 'sad' and 'angry' daps because some trolls found out that it's easier if they specialize towards that type of content while farming for overall dap count in account stats padding and overall trolling behavior that would invoke more bushed content

if neg wars are being restricted by having to rep 25 people before you can rep the same person again, shouldn't dap farm posts and replies also be restricted if the website itself lags from generating new posts and superfluous traffic involving blatant shyt posting, and also free up mod tickets? (this also involves alt accounts replying to main accounts' posts within a couple of minutes from each other from the same IP address for more sophisticated alley-oop dap-farming techniques -- idk why we haven't banned people and restricted them from logging into two accounts consistently if IP addressed could be easily checked and traced on all devices for 100% matches if it's consistently the same person in the same web session and not someone else different from the same household but from a different web session and web visitation times...also, why aren't previously banned members also IP banned if they always come back during open registration for another round of relentless disruption? banned members should be IP banned from even loading up the forum, where the list of commonly spoofed VPN IP addressed could be easily found and also blocked to prevent all these lurker guest weirdos from slowing down the website all the time).

As the number of posts and users increase on this forum, the forum becomes more expensive to scale monetarily in storage, bandwidth, and latency -- shouldn't there be an automatic archival/sunset/deletion system on the forum for posts that never got any replies, daps, reps, or overall views/interactions to speed up network traffic to load up lesser posts in the number of pages that forum has accumulated, as well as prevent these archived posts to be searchable long-term in the search results for faster website latency? (this would also include stored media that were never used more than a couple times with rare use-cases -- all stored media including smileys could be outsourced to other free image hosting platforms). This would also reduce storage space if the archived posts are compressed as view-only, text-only with lesser fancy GUI load-up, all unraveled media embeds could be converted back into simple links, and non-repliable after a certain number of years of overall inactivity, under a certain view-count rate threshold.

Shouldn't the forum website restrict some bots and internet web crawlers from scraping the site too often for whatever intentions that they might have (especially these new-age vigilante bot web scrapers that take forum sentiments to predict overall stock interest and gauge crypto hype) with a better prevention system with like a more restrictively written robots.txt file (that could be easily copied over and templated after another website like amazon, etc) or with like a ddos/cloudflare bot captcha catcher-system during the site's peak hours to prevent overall site lag? These are considerations, thanks

Ain't nobody reading all that shyt man. Angry face already takes away rep, you did all that soliloquizing for nothing. Here, let me demonstrate
 
Top