flick was fried doodoo. As soon as I found out the whole village was fake and adrien brody was runnin around in a wolf costume I wanted to walk out.
We need that unbreakable sequel doe
for hours after i found it was 2005 instead of 1695. I never would've expected that shyt.I disagree, Signs is a damn fine film. I ain't even mad about the plot holes. Them aliens invaded a water filled planet because they're about that life....
I'd go as far as saying that The Village is excellent up until the second (And absolutely ridiculous) twist. Should have just kept it as a period movie.
the twist in the village is ridiculous but you excuse aliens who can not get wet and open doors even though they have hands.
Damn you must really like signs.
It's not a matter of realism or even logic.
You're comparing plot holes to a plot twist. They are different, they have a different effect on my liking of the movie. The plot holes in Signs can be either ignored or explained away in some fashion...it's a movie about aliens, so you have to suspend your disbelief anyways.
The Village didn't have plot holes per-se, it's just the the entire story is ruined by the premise that it all took place in the modern world. It's a twist that, in my eyes, served no thematic purpose...it was the cheapest "gotcha" imaginable. Shame, because it really does have some good moments in it.
But yeah, I do stan for Signs, I just think it's a very well done genre movie, regardless of whether or not it had some questionable logic....
