San Francisco Court Orders Black Landlord to Forfeit Her $4M House to White Tenant

BlackJesus

Spread science, save with coupons
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
7,208
Reputation
-3,308
Daps
20,857
Reppin
The Cosmos
It's not one. It's 23. She's repeatedly broken the law and the court dropped the hammer. She's evicted little old ladies, black tenants and disabled people. Fukk her. Did you not read the article?

So your lumping black people in with helpless little old ladies and the disabled?

That speaks more to how you feel about blacks than she does.:mjpls:
 

mattw1313

Superstar
Joined
Jan 24, 2017
Messages
3,154
Reputation
565
Daps
15,697
:yeshrug:She should be able to get away with all the grimy stuff a white Landlord gets away with if its legal.

sure, but if it was legal she wouldn't have 1,600 violations and millions of dollars in fines and judgments and all of her properties in recievership

if you mean she should be better at being a grimy landlord, then yeah maybe that starts with being smart enough to know who you can get away with being shytty to, and not take on the PR nightmare of being shytty to the disabled and elderly in a tenant friendly city :manny:


more to the point, white landlords, especially jewish landlords, typically do the grimy shyt to us and take the profits back to their community. taking advantage of each other (that's if you even consider her 'us') to stack personal wealth, is not the move
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
46,213
Reputation
16,909
Daps
237,331
Reppin
Harlem
She deserved it. But lets be real. A court wouldn't have given a black tenant a 4 million property. and a white landlord no matter how cruel and shady wouldn't have had her properties taken like that. that basically violated her rights in order to give her what she deserves. Which is fine in her case, but what happens to the next black landlord someone complains that was treating their tenants fairly? The precedent isn't good even though the result might be. Don't think white folks won't take this and use against an innocent black person.
 

Dwayne_Taylor

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
6,768
Reputation
571
Daps
28,972
sure, but if it was legal she wouldn't have 1,600 violations and millions of dollars in fines and judgments and all of her properties in recievership

I think it's more likely that the local officials are targeting her because she's a black business and they want to gentrify the area. that's how they do it 2 black homeowners / landlords in every city
 

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
10,113
Reputation
2,350
Daps
61,888
Reppin
Imperium of Man
I think it's more likely that the local officials are targeting her because she's a black business and they want to gentrify the area. that's how they do it 2 black homeowners / landlords in every city
:leostare:If anyone's gentrifying the area, it's her. She's the one pushing out rent controlled tenants to move in market raters, aka rich white folks.
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,208
Reputation
1,509
Daps
54,313
So your lumping black people in with helpless little old ladies and the disabled?

That speaks more to how you feel about blacks than she does.:mjpls:
No it proves all she gaf about is hurting people and making $ by any means necessary. :camby:
 

mattw1313

Superstar
Joined
Jan 24, 2017
Messages
3,154
Reputation
565
Daps
15,697
She deserved it. But lets be real. A court wouldn't have given a black tenant a 4 million property. and a white landlord no matter how cruel and shady wouldn't have had her properties taken like that. that basically violated her rights in order to give her what she deserves. Which is fine in her case, but what happens to the next black landlord someone complains that was treating their tenants fairly? The precedent isn't good even though the result might be. Don't think white folks won't take this and use against an innocent black person.

Nobody gave anybody a property. Her properties all went into receivership to be sold. Why, on page 15, are we still taking this deranged rant as fact?:unimpressed:
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,182
Reputation
7,614
Daps
97,534
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
Nobody gave anybody a property. Her properties all went into receivership to be sold. Why, on page 15, are we still taking this deranged rant as fact?:unimpressed:
Especially when you click the articles in the OP and both are deleted cause they was obviously lying

"Want to hide money, hide it in a book.... Cause nikkas don't read" - Chris Rock
 
Top