Hahhaahah. That's gold.Another reason why we shouldn't have public parks or institutions. They should be privatized and if you don't like the monuments, don't patronize those parks and institutions![]()

Having a monument doesn't mean "we" celebrate anything.
I'm beyond even trying to rationalize the ridiculous idea that the US is for black americans or that black americans are a part of it.
If it makes you feel good to hang around white people and complain about them not respecting or loving you or whatever fine.
shyt means nothing for me, tear their monuments down via crying all they do is hide their respect and admiration.
Let them celebrate their heroes out in the open, I don't give a damn, I know this country doesn't operate in my best interest and that majority of whties in this country like it that way. If these monuments get kids and other blacks to learn that shyt quicker, I'd count that as a overall positive
The many public sites identified in the SPLC report point to one of the most compelling critiques of Confederate monuments. Maintaining them requires taxpayer dollars. Even when there’s strong support at a local level for an individual monument, many of them exist in part by taxing populations that may not otherwise support them, but have no choice—like any black Southerner whose property taxes support a school named for Nathan Bedford Forrest.
Start by replacing George Washington with Ona JudgeIf they're so concerned about sanitizing history they should raise monuments honoring the victims of atrocities...not the perpetrators.

Her and Sherriff Clarke would be perfect for each other if not for the fact that they both hate black people.

Look, I see your point, but there has to be some compromise. All nations are built on the myth of their founders.Start by replacing George Washington with Ona Judge![]()