Mansa Musa is Montezuma?
Cannibalism NEVER happening in Africa?
Melanin being a super chemical and Melanin being a fetal developer of "soul?" This just shows a lack of understanding of modern biology and embryology. Its kinda embarrassing. Its largely pseudoscience: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin_theory
Africa isn't violent. Ok. Lets be fukking real. The place is largely unstable as fukk. Not saying its all kids toting guns, but its definitely mostly poor and examples of growth are few and far inbetween.
All moors are black? As if North Africans are the same as West, East, and Southern Africans? Really?
The focus on Egypt is pretty narrow and limited. Not everything black is from Egypt. Its been "arab" for a REALLY long time.
Astrological superiority? What? Stop it.
Scottish people are africans because of black beards? Really?
Nations are falling based on how they invaded africa? Really?
Lets talk about Moors.
Not every single "melanated" person is a moor. Lets just be serious now. thats like saying Ethiopians are the same as Nigerians.
Its just fukking false.
Yes. They ran shyt in the Mediterranean area for a bit...but YOU...TODAY...aren't a moor. Just be serious with yourself.
They DID get some stuff right as to the formation of the KKK being mostly economically based and a response to white male unemployment, the psychology of american education and mental disease, religious iconography being misused, and pre-columbian contact, lost images of african influence of culture and architecture, black patron saints, black samurais, efforts to hide dark skin representations in the media, Gandhi being racist, asian and pacific influence of african lineage, etc.
I understand the desire to be pro-black and to uncover the source of lost history, but theres NO need to make shyt up with pseudointellectual speculation and let unfounded, unsubstantiated assertions run wild. If you're going to do that, at least try to go deeper into information and support what you're saying with detail.
Its not helping your/our case. There is TOO MUCH positivity to be shared in these films to be marred by SIMPLE errors.
EDIT:
Here is my challenge to everyone in this thread:
I don't care how you "get" the documentaries. Watch them tonight and tell me if ya'll have ANY problem with the content in there.
Ya'll can't tell me you agree with 100% of EVERYTHING in these films.
Cannibalism NEVER happening in Africa?
Melanin being a super chemical and Melanin being a fetal developer of "soul?" This just shows a lack of understanding of modern biology and embryology. Its kinda embarrassing. Its largely pseudoscience: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin_theory
Africa isn't violent. Ok. Lets be fukking real. The place is largely unstable as fukk. Not saying its all kids toting guns, but its definitely mostly poor and examples of growth are few and far inbetween.
All moors are black? As if North Africans are the same as West, East, and Southern Africans? Really?
The focus on Egypt is pretty narrow and limited. Not everything black is from Egypt. Its been "arab" for a REALLY long time.
Astrological superiority? What? Stop it.
Scottish people are africans because of black beards? Really?
Nations are falling based on how they invaded africa? Really?
Lets talk about Moors.
Not every single "melanated" person is a moor. Lets just be serious now. thats like saying Ethiopians are the same as Nigerians.
Its just fukking false.
Yes. They ran shyt in the Mediterranean area for a bit...but YOU...TODAY...aren't a moor. Just be serious with yourself.
They DID get some stuff right as to the formation of the KKK being mostly economically based and a response to white male unemployment, the psychology of american education and mental disease, religious iconography being misused, and pre-columbian contact, lost images of african influence of culture and architecture, black patron saints, black samurais, efforts to hide dark skin representations in the media, Gandhi being racist, asian and pacific influence of african lineage, etc.
I understand the desire to be pro-black and to uncover the source of lost history, but theres NO need to make shyt up with pseudointellectual speculation and let unfounded, unsubstantiated assertions run wild. If you're going to do that, at least try to go deeper into information and support what you're saying with detail.
Its not helping your/our case. There is TOO MUCH positivity to be shared in these films to be marred by SIMPLE errors.
EDIT:
Here is my challenge to everyone in this thread:
I don't care how you "get" the documentaries. Watch them tonight and tell me if ya'll have ANY problem with the content in there.
Ya'll can't tell me you agree with 100% of EVERYTHING in these films.
Last edited:
