Saweetie told a bunch of ppl she would do a 3some with Quavo but it has to be with another GUY! Lmao
- Thread starter Don'tCallMeLuckyB
- Start date
Hungerpain
Banned
Not really
im not derailing the thread, both you and saweetie want a 3 some with 2 men
2 men?
You mean me, your mama, and your crush that turned you down
Context is different so we can't oversimplify this issue. First, there hasn't been 3000 years of suppression of male heterosexuality. Quite the opposite actually. Moreover, virtually all visual sexual mediums are aggressively geared towards men while being incredibly disrespectful to the female form. Porn is overwhelmingly degrading for women, not men. Female pleasure isn't even an afterthought in most porn, and its rife with imagery of women being abused, degraded, zero clitoral stimulation, choked, cum shots, cursed at. Meanwhile the lesbian porn emphasizes the female pleasure to a much larger extent. In order for women to get any visual mediums that emphasize female pleasure, the porn industry effectively took men out of the equation. Men did this. Not women. Male porn directors said "men don't wanna see all that sensuality shyt, that's that lesbian shyt" and there ya go. They dictated that male porn=violence and female porn=female pleasure. There are exceptions, but this is the general rule. When you have a system that is so fukked up where the only way you see somebody that looks like you getting off is when they are with another female, that has less to do with the watcher and more to do with the medium itself. Somebody can be vegan all day but even they will eat meat if they starving. And because female sexuality has been so misunderstood and warped to the extent that we don't even KNOW that women WANT visual depictions of sex because after all "men are visual creatures" as if women aintQuestion: If a straight dude watched gay porn because he wanted to see dudes enjoy themselves is he gay
..., its really caused a huge issue in access to quality erotica for females. Because we aren't even supposed to want or enjoy erotica in our puritan, pearl clutching, hypocritical society. Basically porn is creating lesbian women and sociopathic woman-hating men...
That sounds crazy but it is.Meanwhile ask yourself why most female romance novels are primarily geared towards heterosexual relationships even though they can be just as sexually explicit as pornography. Do you know lesbians bytch at the romance industry because there aren't enough female/female couples represented in romance genres. Its because women are the authors of female smut and thus they write the sexual encounters with men that most women desire, only in a way that promotes female sexual satisfaction. There's very little pornography that is aesthetically pleasing with handsome men who are romantic, seductive and savor a woman's body and depict intense intimacy.
Thus if a woman does want to see a woman getting off so that she can experience that vicariously, the low quality of porn all but funnels her towards female/female porn.
In short, female depictions in porn are so awful and degrading that you gotta damn near watch lesbian porn to see a chick cum. What if porn was that way for men? Then your question would be valid.
I mean I want you to really think about this. What if the only porn depicting male satisfaction and men as valued human beings was with other men? What if most porn between a man and woman was degrading to the man? Like she was pissing on him, degrading him, telling him he's worthless, porn with barely legal looking dudes, getting insulted, anal, and the men never ever came...like his dikk was irrelevant. Like his pleasure didn't matter. But instead gay porn was full of respect and male satisfaction? You see how its a set up?
Last edited:
Quavo should have agreed, then picked the fattest, nastiest, trumpiest, meth-mouthed, backwood, redneck cac he could find, then left out the room and told her he'd be right back.
Silver Surfer
Veteran
Nahh.....
Appreciate you sharing your thoughtsContext is different so we can't oversimplify this issue. First, there hasn't been 3000 years of suppression of male heterosexuality. Quite the opposite actually. Moreover, virtually all visual sexual mediums are aggressively geared towards men while being incredibly disrespectful to the female form. Porn is overwhelmingly degrading for women, not men. Female pleasure isn't even an afterthought in most porn, and its rife with imagery of women being abused, degraded, zero clitoral stimulation, choked, cum shots, cursed at. Meanwhile the lesbian porn emphasizes the female pleasure to a much larger extent. In order for women to get any visual mediums that emphasize female pleasure, the porn industry effectively took men out of the equation. Men did this. Not women. Male porn directors said "men don't wanna see all that sensuality shyt, that's that lesbian shyt" and there ya go. They dictated that male porn=violence and female porn=female pleasure. There are exceptions, but this is the general rule. When you have a system that is so fukked up where the only way you see somebody that looks like you getting off is when they are with another female, that has less to do with the watcher and more to do with the medium itself. Somebody can be vegan all day but even they will eat meat if they starving. And because female sexuality has been so misunderstood and warped to the extent that we don't even KNOW that women WANT visual depictions of sex because after all "men are visual creatures" as if women aint
Meanwhile ask yourself why most female romance novels are primarily geared towards heterosexual relationships even though they can be just as sexually explicit as pornography. Do you know lesbians bytch at the romance industry because there aren't enough female/female couples represented in romance genres. Its because women are the authors of female smut and thus they write the sexual encounters with men that most women desire, only in a way that promotes female sexual satisfaction. There's very little pornography that is aesthetically pleasing with handsome men who are romantic, seductive and savor a woman's body and depict intense intimacy.
Thus if a woman does want to see a woman getting off so that she can experience that vicariously, the low quality of porn all but funnels her towards female/female porn.
In short, female depictions in porn are so awful and degrading that you gotta damn near watch lesbian porn to see a chick cum. What if porn was that way for men? Then your question would be valid.
I mean I want you to really think about this. What if the only porn depicting male satisfaction and men as valued human beings was with other men? What if most porn between a man and woman was degrading to the man? Like she was pissing on him, degrading him, telling him he's worthless, porn with barely legal looking dudes, getting insulted, anal, and the men never ever came...like his dikk was irrelevant. Like his pleasure didn't matter. But instead gay porn was full of respect and male satisfaction? You see how its a set up?
got me ponderingIn recent years Ive realized that porn is overall bad, for many reasons. You touch on a few good points
EDIT: are women really visual? In my discussions with women IRL it’s very clear they aren’t nearly as visual as men are.
I still be in JBO tho
nikkas telling on themselves,I've never had a chick tell me she wanted a train/threesome 
If a female tells you this,she's basically being disrespectful and telling you that you aren't satisfying her.
She likes you as a guy and doesn't want to lose you,so you would be allowed to be there.
But your dikk is a second thought in the equation. The fantasy isn't both of you at the same time,the fantasy is the other dikk.
And possibly you watching from the sideline because she has masculine energy and enjoys you being the bytch in the relationship.
But with that said,she may be joking,but your woman should know she can't joke like that.
Dating a woman from the Bay or Cali in general, or Detroit isn't for the weak hearted
If a female tells you this,she's basically being disrespectful and telling you that you aren't satisfying her.
She likes you as a guy and doesn't want to lose you,so you would be allowed to be there.
But your dikk is a second thought in the equation. The fantasy isn't both of you at the same time,the fantasy is the other dikk.
And possibly you watching from the sideline because she has masculine energy and enjoys you being the bytch in the relationship.
But with that said,she may be joking,but your woman should know she can't joke like that.
Dating a woman from the Bay or Cali in general, or Detroit isn't for the weak hearted
Silver Surfer
Veteran
nikkas telling on themselves,I've never had a chick tell me she wanted a train/threesome
If a female tells you this,she's basically being disrespectful and telling you that you aren't satisfying her.
She likes you as a guy and doesn't want to lose you,so you would be allowed to be there.
But your dikk is a second thought in the equation. The fantasy isn't both of you at the same time,the fantasy is the other dikk.
And possibly you watching from the sideline because she has masculine energy and enjoys you being the bytch in the relationship.
But with that said,she may be joking,but your woman should know she can't joke like that.
Dating a woman from the Bay or Cali in general, or Detroit isn't for the weak hearted
A woman won't say that out loud...especially if she respects her man...thats a fantasy thing.
She it out loud because she dont respect Quavo and she prolly been fukking around for some time.
Lucky_Lefty
Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Workin' me (work), she workin' me (work, work)
idk if its just me, but bay area women seem to be a tad bit more aggresive than LA women who seem to be more laidback.
idk if its aggressive is the right word... Assertive i think is more appropriate
LMAO! Delete your cookies, clear your history and happy humping good sir!Appreciate you sharing your thoughts
In recent years Ive realized that porn is overall bad, for many reasons. You touch on a few good points
I still be in JBO tho
I just think Porn industry needs an overhaul. Humans like depictions of human sexuality. Some of the earliest art forms are people getting it on. Its healthy in moderation. But unfortunately, I think some evil, homosexual woman-haters got the porn industry by the balls (all pun intended). LMAO! I've known even males complain about porn because they don't want to see all the degrading weird shyt in a lotta cases.
Some people are into a lotta stuff and as long as its consensual, go for it. But the porn industry is overwhelmingly sick and getting more and more extreme by the day and influencing people. Life is quickly starting to imitate art.
Also great question! Ur question made me think too! And its always nice to encounter normal individuals who can converse without devolving into hangry ranters....
