Thats actually not true.
Science, Religion, and the Big Bang
- Thread starter ↓R↑LYB
- Start date
Only watched the first video so far. It's all super interesting. One theory is that the "Big Bang" is actually what happens on the other side of a black hole aka when an extremely large star dies. I like that theory a lot.
Also time travel is possible. But future time travel not past time travel. It "can" be done 3 ways. Through a wormhole which is HIGHLY unlikely considering the time they exist and the small scale that they exist on. Two, since time slows down when you are near a dense body a Black hole (extremely dense) can be used. This is done by coming close enough to the Black hole to be put into an orbit but not pulled into it. The time near the hole would seem normal to the travelers but on Earth the time would pass twice as fast (for example). However this theory doesn't allow for large amounts of time to be traveled. The third is by using the speed of light. As of now nothing is faster than the speed of light. It is one of the rules of this particular dimensional reality and has not/can not be broken b/c once an object approaches the speed of light time begins to slow to prevent you. This theory would allow for large amounts of time to be traveled but it would require a very large ship that would likely never be seen again to travel far far away from Earth. It would allow us to reach the closest "Earth-like" plant in about 70 years. With this method and amazing amounts of fuel you would be able to travel millions of years into the future.
Time travel has already happen in a lab using partials.
Also time travel is possible. But future time travel not past time travel. It "can" be done 3 ways. Through a wormhole which is HIGHLY unlikely considering the time they exist and the small scale that they exist on. Two, since time slows down when you are near a dense body a Black hole (extremely dense) can be used. This is done by coming close enough to the Black hole to be put into an orbit but not pulled into it. The time near the hole would seem normal to the travelers but on Earth the time would pass twice as fast (for example). However this theory doesn't allow for large amounts of time to be traveled. The third is by using the speed of light. As of now nothing is faster than the speed of light. It is one of the rules of this particular dimensional reality and has not/can not be broken b/c once an object approaches the speed of light time begins to slow to prevent you. This theory would allow for large amounts of time to be traveled but it would require a very large ship that would likely never be seen again to travel far far away from Earth. It would allow us to reach the closest "Earth-like" plant in about 70 years. With this method and amazing amounts of fuel you would be able to travel millions of years into the future.
Time travel has already happen in a lab using partials.
observe
Banned
Exactly the Big Bang is just a theory..soon someone will come and poke holes in it..its not a scientific law in nature..
Dr. Sebi Jr.
Trust Me
There are many alien beings here on the so-called "Earth". @comradeyakub and @Master Teacher can explain.
Stupid SHEEPLE. Snowden? And he's hiding in Russia? SNOWED IN?
You think that's a COINCIDENCE????!!!!!!
It's such an obvious false flag.
Dr. Sebi Jr.
Trust Me
Scientific theories and religion are neck and neck when it comes to pure bullshyt that can't be proven.
We're so far behind in science and space travel. We landed on the Moon in the 60s and haven't been back since?
Where's the footage of a remote rover on Mars? We aint land on no GoT damn moon.
Most people still use gas combustion engines.
How the fukk you gon time travel?
We're so far behind in science and space travel. We landed on the Moon in the 60s and haven't been back since?
Where's the footage of a remote rover on Mars? We aint land on no GoT damn moon.Most people still use gas combustion engines.
How the fukk you gon time travel?Until we learn to abstract energy from water or some abundant resource that won't destroy earth or the ozone layer, FUKKK SCIENCE!!!! 
We don't even have a true flying car.
Technology and Science has hurt us more than helped up. Bunch Fat, Disease, in Debt, Stressed Out People. We were better off as Hunters and Gatherers.
We don't even have a true flying car.
Technology and Science has hurt us more than helped up. Bunch Fat, Disease, in Debt, Stressed Out People. We were better off as Hunters and Gatherers.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,020
- Daps
- 122,436
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
observe said:
Already did, breh. That's why they added Cosmic Inflation since the Big Bang wouldn't allow for the symmetry we've observed in the Cosmic Microwave Background..........
Then, they added Dark Matter to account for the speed that galaxies rotate...............
Then, they added Dark Energy to account for the Red Shift...................
Big Bang is on the verge of becoming Phlogiston-status................
Then, they added Dark Matter to account for the speed that galaxies rotate...............
Then, they added Dark Energy to account for the Red Shift...................
Big Bang is on the verge of becoming Phlogiston-status................
This nikka just finished watching MIB.I think people should take a science course when they talk about aliens being on earth.
There are billions of galaxies in the universe. The nearest one is Canis Major Dwarf, which is 25,000 light years away.
One light year is the distance that light travels in a year -- about 6 trillion miles.
So the nearest galaxy is 6 trillion miles x 25,000.
Yet people think that some little green men in a space ship came here and live among us and that "the government" is keeping it secret and no one has seen any evidence of it.
Right.
The governments of all the world are keeping this a secret.
They couldn't even stop Eric Snowden.
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,020
- Daps
- 122,436
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Maas Darko said:
It's impossible to travel 'faster than light', AFAIK, since the faster an object travels, the more mass it gains which requires more energy to propel the object until it reaches 'infinite' mass requiring 'infinite' energy.......
To reach light-speed, an object would have to be massless which would mean it wouldn't be an object (in the traditional sense) since objects have mass. If it were possible to convert an object into pure 'information', faster-than-light speed might be possible, but we're talking Star Trek-transporter technology which is nothing but science fiction at this point.
To reach light-speed, an object would have to be massless which would mean it wouldn't be an object (in the traditional sense) since objects have mass. If it were possible to convert an object into pure 'information', faster-than-light speed might be possible, but we're talking Star Trek-transporter technology which is nothing but science fiction at this point.
observe
Banned
It's impossible to travel 'faster than light', AFAIK, since the faster an object travels, the more mass it gains which requires more energy to propel the object until it reaches 'infinite' mass requiring 'infinite' energy.......
To reach light-speed, an object would have to be massless which would mean it wouldn't be an object (in the traditional sense) since objects have mass. If it were possible to convert an object into pure 'information', faster-than-light speed might be possible, but we're talking Star Trek-transporter technology which is nothing but science fiction at this point.
If quantum physics theories are correct in time we will be able to travel to other universes and back in time
I hope you're not serious. That's not abstracting energy from water. That's using water current.