"scientists claim we came from apes but they lies though"

Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
6,426
Reputation
-1,629
Daps
18,865
I have never seen so many bullshyt-ass posts in one thread :mindblown:

Some of you nikkas seriously need to read some damn books. Like, for REAL.
 

Tommy Knocks

retired
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
26,998
Reputation
6,710
Daps
71,617
Reppin
iPaag
59b8b-1bc29_Worf.gif
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,132
Reputation
1,360
Daps
37,300
Reppin
Los Angeles
so where are all the fossils of the half fish/ape, half rat/human, 20% slug/80% dog, so on and so forth. we've found an abundance of fossils of dinosaurs which existed before man but only a handful of nothing but ape-like creature skeletons people trying to pass off as our ancestors to prove our so called evolution. Wouldn't fossil discoveries that prove our so called evolution clearly be more in abundance considering we came millions of years after the dinosaur era.

:russ: As hilarious as your post is, there are plenty of examples of animals that are clearly transitional phases of two distinct other animals. The examples you named are absolutely horrible and are not animals that co evolved.

You seem completely unaware of how many fossils are available and in good condition. We know very little about Neanderthals yet they were around for hundreds of thousands of years. From all of those years, we have found a few hundred fossils. You not only expect that genetic changes happen in a single generation, you also expect that single generation to be found when we are only finding a microscopic percentage of all living beings? You can't just dig a hole in your backyard and start turning back the clock. Most organisms that lived or died would be completely erased over time.
 

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,270
Reputation
5,167
Daps
120,849
Reppin
ATL to MEM
You're talking about things that are built by us, to test things that we're not even sure if they work correctly. Let me ask you something, with anything in life, regardless of what it is. Whether it be your phone, your gaming system, computer, medicine... whatever. At any given moment your phones screen can crack, you tv can black out, your computer can crap out, medicines can give you all kinds of side effects that can potentially lead to something worse. If we can't perfect things like what we use on an every day basis. What in your right mind thinks we are actually aware that these things are working exactly how they are supposed to. Hell our justice system still uses the god damn lie detector as a viable option(claiming that it works 90% or however much they say it works. Do you believe that too? Just because they told you?) Anyone with common sense can tell you a lie detector is only correct 50% of the time.

I say that to say this... what makes you think a scientist has it completely figured out? They study all their lives trying to prove their theories, but somewhere down the line they could have been wrong in their thesis. They aren't perfect, they are just going off of what they believe. I hate when people say science is the end all be all, it's just simply not. They've proven to be wrong just as much as you think that they are right.

Its funny when people type long shyt like this and think they are making a profound statement when really they are just showing how little they know about the subject matter they are attempting to discuss.

This nikka talking about scientists can be wrong because his phone screen cracked. :russ: Furthermore he believes the reliability of consumer goods can be related to scientific theory and law. :deadrose:
 
Last edited:

JustCKing

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
25,682
Reputation
3,989
Daps
48,998
Reppin
NULL
Only thing that I will say is that it's laughable when people act like they are smarter because they accept science as truth. They will call people "sheep" for believing in God, but they are also sheep because they are following someone else's observations, experiments, and theories.
 

AlldayNE

Pro
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
1,250
Reputation
-50
Daps
865
Reppin
NULL
Its funny when people type long shyt like this and think they are making a profound statement when really they are just showing how little they know about the subject matter they are attempting to discuss.

This nikka talking about scientists can be wrong because his phone screen cracked. :russ: Furthermore he believes the reliability of consumer goods can be related to scientific theory and law. :deadrose:

No you're just an idiot who doesn't get where the point is coming from. Scientist come up with medicine formulas right? How many of them have side effects? All of them right? So if they were so damn good they'd be able to avoid those things right? Oh but you just want to be an idiot who trying to be funny. The point of the post was that no matter how hard we humans try, we cannot make something that it perfectly functional. Learn something.. it's not that hard to see that the things they make aren't perfect. Don't be an idiot
 
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
400
Reputation
65
Daps
601
Reppin
NULL
These scientific empiricists love to talk about how they only believe in things that can be verified tangibly through the scientific method but cling to their dogmatic view of evolution without the existence of any evidence of the "missing link". Now, there is good evidence for a different type of evolution whereby humans and animals do not necessarily have to have evolved very gradually over millions of years but that evolution can happen in relatively quick and drastic leaps. I couldn't clearly elucidate on this without taking a long time so I will simply point people to the work of Pierre Tielhard De Chardin and David Wilcock
 
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
400
Reputation
65
Daps
601
Reppin
NULL
Evolution is a fact. The only arguments against it are made by people that don't understand how it works in the first place, like someone asking for the bones from the first human born to two apes. That is not how it works. Over very long periods of time, geographical isolation along with climate changes can cause a species in one area to have distinctly different characteristics than another. There are tons of examples of this happening, Galapagos turtles are a commonly used example.

IF you wait long enough, those mutations and characteristics can grow to the point that the species are no longer the same and can no longer be considered the same species. Some argue that this has already happened with Mexicans.

IF the bible thumpers are so adamant in their missing link theories, why can't they explain the fact that their bible says all people are related yet two Asians can never give birth to an African american child? Doesn't this disprove that whole Adam and Eve thing (if the fact that different races even exist didnt already accomplish that task)

Actually they have found that all of our genetic material has come from one woman in Africa, I don't know about one man too but the one woman as the person from whom all subsequent people got their genetics from is well known. Now I am no Bible Thumper and think that fundamentalists are worse than atheists, as any rigid dogma is detrimental to true understanding, but I do believe that spiritual beings had a hand in our creation and I will not attempt to go into a lengthy diatribe elucidating why.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,878
Reputation
9,252
Daps
103,351
Creationism actually makes much less sense. Instead of believing that very simple organisms became more complex in an extremely gradual process over millions of years, it suggests that a perfect ethereal being simply snapped his fingers and appeared out of nowhere, creating the human race and senselessly flooding the earth with a huge variety of living beings that are mostly useless to our existence.

It has always been ironic to me that creationists take issue with the idea that this universe came about without a creator or a designer with no starting point, yet they try to answer that flaw by presenting an idea of a supreme being that also has no designer or starting point.


If a pile of shyt comes from a dogs azz,and then another pile of shyt comes from a cows azz...aren't they so closely related you couldn't consider one pile to be shyt and not the other:ohhh:..basically both sides just say "it makes more sense:youngsabo:"...instead of letting the other side BELIEVE what they wanna BELIEVE.

Personally I just believe all this shyt works to complex and coincidently and in sync to be an accident:manny:...its a crazy ammount of possibilities of how we coulda got here...humans workin under the assumption that we are alone in this whole universe we probaly ain't seen 5% of:heh:...even if u don't believe in god how the hell we supposed to know our human existence ain't all by design of more intelligent beings who are billions of years older than us?...if we turned from microspic nuthings into human beings who build jets and computers,how come it can't be a another group of people who's billions of years older than us out there on sum extra next level gawd shyt:blessed:?...we could be in one big video game and they manipulate all this shyt:ohhh:?they on sum create a player mode shyt:russ:...my creator got me postin on the coli bout this bullshyt on a Friday night:sadcam:...but tommorow he might have me save the world:obama:
 
Top