"scientists claim we came from apes but they lies though"

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Most embarrassing smartdumb nikka line the GOAT ever said. It kinda fukked up what was otherwise a beautiful song.

yeah. I blacked that shyt out of my memory. I came into this thread thinking "what dumb ass rapper said this?"

 

[AlldayNE]

i hear you... you are wrong, of course, but i hear what you trying to say. why a blue sky? since we're on this, this is EASILY provable with just a TINY bit of research of wavelengths and the layers of the atmosphere, it's not rocket science, lol, it's actually particle science and chemistry .

You're talking about things that are built by us, to test things that we're not even sure if they work correctly. Let me ask you something, with anything in life, regardless of what it is. Whether it be your phone, your gaming system, computer, medicine... whatever. At any given moment your phones screen can crack, you tv can black out, your computer can crap out, medicines can give you all kinds of side effects that can potentially lead to something worse. If we can't perfect things like what we use on an every day basis. What in your right mind thinks we are actually aware that these things are working exactly how they are supposed to. Hell our justice system still uses the god damn lie detector as a viable option(claiming that it works 90% or however much they say it works. Do you believe that too? Just because they told you?) Anyone with common sense can tell you a lie detector is only correct 50% of the time.

I say that to say this... what makes you think a scientist has it completely figured out? They study all their lives trying to prove their theories, but somewhere down the line they could have been wrong in their thesis. They aren't perfect, they are just going off of what they believe. I hate when people say science is the end all be all, it's just simply not. They've proven to be wrong just as much as you think that they are right.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

be uneducated and argue against evolution and science online brehs

 

[Bilz]

Evolution is a fact. The only arguments against it are made by people that don't understand how it works in the first place, like someone asking for the bones from the first human born to two apes. That is not how it works. Over very long periods of time, geographical isolation along with climate changes can cause a species in one area to have distinctly different characteristics than another. There are tons of examples of this happening, Galapagos turtles are a commonly used example.

IF you wait long enough, those mutations and characteristics can grow to the point that the species are no longer the same and can no longer be considered the same species. Some argue that this has already happened with Mexicans.

IF the bible thumpers are so adamant in their missing link theories, why can't they explain the fact that their bible says all people are related yet two Asians can never give birth to an African american child? Doesn't this disprove that whole Adam and Eve thing (if the fact that different races even exist didnt already accomplish that task)

 

[Mr. Somebody]

You are not going to dictate the terms of this discussion. You need to relinquish that misguided certitude that fetters your bible thumping ilk and let yourself "evolve" into a modern human. Or you can fukk off and die. I am tired of your histrionics, my friend.

Sorry but i just cant die for you but God bless you.

 

[the cac mamba]

Its faith,nikka. Don't turn into an annoying atheist. Let them nikkas believe in their book,breh

fukk all that, dude came in the thread w his usual propaganda. let him defend his "faith" thats actually fact

 

[unseen]

we share dna with a lot of other things besides apes.we share with rats, cats,dogs, snails, etc. just happens that we share a lot with apes.

the theory of evolution has its flaws.

to me it make more sense that we were created with attributes/elements of all things in creation (and thats why we share dna) as opposed to this dumb idea we share one particular common ancestor with all these different animals, apes, insects, fish, seaweed, slime, etc.

 

[Bilz]

we share dna with a lot of other things besides apes.we share with rats, cats,dogs, snails, etc. just happens that we share a lot with apes.

the theory of evolution has its flaws.

to me it make more sense that we were created with attributes/elements of all things in creation (and thats why we share dna) as opposed to this dumb idea we share one particular common ancestor with all these different animals, apes, insects, fish, seaweed, slime, etc.

Creationism actually makes much less sense. Instead of believing that very simple organisms became more complex in an extremely gradual process over millions of years, it suggests that a perfect ethereal being simply snapped his fingers and appeared out of nowhere, creating the human race and senselessly flooding the earth with a huge variety of living beings that are mostly useless to our existence.

It has always been ironic to me that creationists take issue with the idea that this universe came about without a creator or a designer with no starting point, yet they try to answer that flaw by presenting an idea of a supreme being that also has no designer or starting point.

 

[unseen]

Creationism actually makes much less sense. Instead of believing that very simple organisms became more complex in an extremely gradual process over millions of years, it suggests that a perfect ethereal being simply snapped his fingers and appeared out of nowhere, creating the human race and senselessly flooding the earth with a huge variety of living beings that are mostly useless to our existence.

It has always been ironic to me that creationists take issue with the idea that this universe came about without a creator or a designer with no starting point, yet they try to answer that flaw by presenting an idea of a supreme being that also has no designer or starting point.

so where are all the fossils of the half fish/ape, half rat/human, 20% slug/80% dog, so on and so forth. we've found an abundance of fossils of dinosaurs which existed before man but only a handful of nothing but ape-like creature skeletons people trying to pass off as our ancestors to prove our so called evolution. Wouldn't fossil discoveries that prove our so called evolution clearly be more in abundance considering we came millions of years after the dinosaur era.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

so where are all the fossils of the half fish/ape, half rat/human, 20% slug/80% dog, so on and so forth. we've found an abundance of fossils of dinosaurs which existed before man but only a handful of nothing but ape-like creature skeletons people trying to pass off as our ancestors to prove our so called evolution.

20% slug 80% dog?

 

[Slang]

Science is the manipulation of language and imagery. Most people call it lying.

 

[waynep]

*Grabs Popcorn*

 

[5n0man]

so where are all the fossils of the half fish/ape, half rat/human, 20% slug/80% dog, so on and so forth. we've found an abundance of fossils of dinosaurs which existed before man but only a handful of nothing but ape-like creature skeletons people trying to pass off as our ancestors to prove our so called evolution. Wouldn't fossil discoveries that prove our so called evolution clearly be more in abundance considering we came millions of years after the dinosaur era.

You just missed the entire point of the post you quoted

 

[Propaganda]

so where are all the fossils of the half fish/ape, half rat/human, 20% slug/80% dog, so on and so forth. we've found an abundance of fossils of dinosaurs which existed before man but only a handful of nothing but ape-like creature skeletons people trying to pass off as our ancestors to prove our so called evolution. Wouldn't fossil discoveries that prove our so called evolution clearly be more in abundance considering we came millions of years after the dinosaur era.

yo...this can't be life

 

[King Biko]

Evolution is a fact. The only arguments against it are made by people that don't understand how it works in the first place, like someone asking for the bones from the first human born to two apes. That is not how it works. Over very long periods of time, geographical isolation along with climate changes can cause a species in one area to have distinctly different characteristics than another. There are tons of examples of this happening, Galapagos turtles are a commonly used example.

IF you wait long enough, those mutations and characteristics can grow to the point that the species are no longer the same and can no longer be considered the same species. Some argue that this has already happened with Mexicans.

IF the bible thumpers are so adamant in their missing link theories, why can't they explain the fact that their bible says all people are related yet two Asians can never give birth to an African american child? Doesn't this disprove that whole Adam and Eve thing (if the fact that different races even exist didnt already accomplish that task)

@ Mexicans being a different species