Scientists discover BIGGEST DINOSAUR EVER
- Thread starter God Almighty
- Start date
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
humans werent around then.....
NuWorldOrder
Pro
If the animals on land were this big no telling what was lurking in the water back then
A blue whale is bigger than this thing which is crazy
When the meteor hit earth was the ocean and its creatures affected as well???
I'llBeLate4That
Pro
Real question is how many Brock Lesnars would it take to kill it?
This is all that matters.
A 6 mile wide asteroid hitting the earth would affect everything
why did all the Marine dinosaurs die off thoA 6 mile wide asteroid hitting the earth would affect everything
you would think it if Wall the dinosaurs, the one in the water would've been ok?
Ya Sinning Mane
Superstar
Yea right.sure.
How they know they got the bones in the exact spots and thats how it really looked.if it existed.how they know if they not missing wings,horns,etc.
these cacs make stuff out of thin air and throw it at us thinkin we gon eat it up.FOH
give a fukk bout a dinosaur anyway.dinosaurs look dumb as hell.short arms big head. little body.big huge ass tail.
i aint going for it.
even when i was a lil jit i thought it was fake.
Jus imo.Someone enlighten me if im wrong.im not afraid of disabuse.
How they know they got the bones in the exact spots and thats how it really looked.if it existed.how they know if they not missing wings,horns,etc.
these cacs make stuff out of thin air and throw it at us thinkin we gon eat it up.FOH
give a fukk bout a dinosaur anyway.dinosaurs look dumb as hell.short arms big head. little body.big huge ass tail.
i aint going for it.even when i was a lil jit i thought it was fake.
Jus imo.Someone enlighten me if im wrong.im not afraid of disabuse.
I mean
ORDER_66
I am The Wrench in all your plans....
And people be thinking these dinosaur bones be fake and made up....
I wish we had a time machine and throw all of them back there for a few seconds then let them pop that shyt... 
I wish we had a time machine and throw all of them back there for a few seconds then let them pop that shyt...
NuWorldOrder
Pro
Yea right.sure.
How they know they got the bones in the exact spots and thats how it really looked.if it existed.how they know if they not missing wings,horns,etc.
these cacs make stuff out of thin air and throw it at us thinkin we gon eat it up.FOH
give a fukk bout a dinosaur anyway.dinosaurs look dumb as hell.short arms big head. little body.big huge ass tail.
even when i was a lil jit i thought it was fake.
BlackMajik
Behind Enemy Lines
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 45,482
- Reputation
- 12,618
- Daps
- 232,345
- Reppin
- DSGB(Down South Georgia Boy)
How could a dino that big eat enough food a day to even exist
BlackMajik
Behind Enemy Lines
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 45,482
- Reputation
- 12,618
- Daps
- 232,345
- Reppin
- DSGB(Down South Georgia Boy)
I believe Dinos existed but this is just strange to me
Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Theory of Prehistoric Dinosaurs
There would not have been enough food or fresh water for plant-based animals this big to have lived
Yes, elephants exist, and elephants are large. However, an elephant, which is a fraction of the size of a Brontosaurus, has to eat for 18 hours every day in order to survive. However, even in ancient times, there was still only 24 hours within each 24 hour period (basic logic).
Since an elephant can't survive without eating 18 hours per day every day, and a Brontosaurus was supposedly 5 to 10 times larger than an elephant, then a brontosaurus would have to eat for around 90 to 180 hours per day. Yes, you read that right, and it's not a typo. It is logically impossible to eat for 90 hours per 24 hour day.
Even if it scarfed down food much quicker, it still comes nowhere close to having enough time to sustain itself. If it did absolutely nothing but eat and sleep, it still wouldn't even come close. Even if it never slept but only ate, still it would not even come close. That means that it could never even reach full size. That would be impossible. It makes no sense for a creature which could never get larger than a baby to even exist in the first place.
However, this isn't even the real problem with the existence of giant plant-eating creatures. The real problem is that there wouldn't even be enough food for them to eat (not to mention enough fresh water to drink).
Take the example of the Australian rabbit. This tiny animal in relatively large numbers has wreaked havoc on the local environment. Take the following excerpt:
Consider the effect of just these tiny creatures. Now consider the daily consumption of one single plant-eating dinosaur. At 13 tons, a Mamenchisaurus, similar to a Brontosaurus, would have to have eaten 1,150 pounds of vegetation per day. This is probably equivalent to about 10,000 rabbits, maybe more (that number is just an educated guess).
If a few thousand rabbits can destroy entire ecosystems, then consider what billions of rabbits would do. There would be nothing left, for anyone. All plants would go extinct. That's what would happen if these massive dinosaurs roamed the Earth. There would not be any plants left to eat. Most plant species would go extinct.
Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Theory of Prehistoric Dinosaurs
There would not have been enough food or fresh water for plant-based animals this big to have lived
Yes, elephants exist, and elephants are large. However, an elephant, which is a fraction of the size of a Brontosaurus, has to eat for 18 hours every day in order to survive. However, even in ancient times, there was still only 24 hours within each 24 hour period (basic logic).
Since an elephant can't survive without eating 18 hours per day every day, and a Brontosaurus was supposedly 5 to 10 times larger than an elephant, then a brontosaurus would have to eat for around 90 to 180 hours per day. Yes, you read that right, and it's not a typo. It is logically impossible to eat for 90 hours per 24 hour day.
Even if it scarfed down food much quicker, it still comes nowhere close to having enough time to sustain itself. If it did absolutely nothing but eat and sleep, it still wouldn't even come close. Even if it never slept but only ate, still it would not even come close. That means that it could never even reach full size. That would be impossible. It makes no sense for a creature which could never get larger than a baby to even exist in the first place.
However, this isn't even the real problem with the existence of giant plant-eating creatures. The real problem is that there wouldn't even be enough food for them to eat (not to mention enough fresh water to drink).
Take the example of the Australian rabbit. This tiny animal in relatively large numbers has wreaked havoc on the local environment. Take the following excerpt:
Consider the effect of just these tiny creatures. Now consider the daily consumption of one single plant-eating dinosaur. At 13 tons, a Mamenchisaurus, similar to a Brontosaurus, would have to have eaten 1,150 pounds of vegetation per day. This is probably equivalent to about 10,000 rabbits, maybe more (that number is just an educated guess).
If a few thousand rabbits can destroy entire ecosystems, then consider what billions of rabbits would do. There would be nothing left, for anyone. All plants would go extinct. That's what would happen if these massive dinosaurs roamed the Earth. There would not be any plants left to eat. Most plant species would go extinct.
No humans, nothing but lush greenery. Them mothafukkas were eating good all day everyday
Also the atmosphere was much different and condusive to large growth. This affected foiliage as well.
U have to consider the aftermath from the impact. The sun being blocked out and that toxic rain/fallout would affect the food chain from the top down in the ocean.why did all the Marine dinosaurs die off tho