Scientists Say A Terrifying Population Correction Is Coming Soon

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
71,723
Reputation
14,301
Daps
303,533
Reppin
Toronto
On the conspiracy side of the game,

How come the whole world seems like they at war? Then a article like this is released


They gave you the logic where's the conspiracy? I've literally been saying depopulation is the future all this year. A deduction from analysis. Why always run to conspiracy?


Countries like India should be held accountable.
 

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
19,420
Reputation
5,135
Daps
84,917
This is a thread where conspiracy theorists are gonna be like:


full
THEY MAKE THEIR FROGS GAY! Hillary is a lizzard! And she's built Fema camps accross the United States! With level 5 radation zones and Haarp weather machines!

The earth population is rising too fast. You can thank those poor asian countries where they breed 10 children where half of them don't make it past 18. A horrible parenthood, treating kids like expendable assets, but it's been like that in their culture forever.

In first world countries there is actual lack of population rise because many adults don't wanna have children due to their careers. America is gonna enjoy the steady rise of indian and other asian immigrant rise over next few decades.
 
Last edited:

Whore D'oeuvres

Still Trippin
Supporter
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
1,144
Reputation
531
Daps
5,161
Reppin
Soufside
I love how the "experts" and these articles always point the finger at the common individual. Our consumerism. Our fossil fuel use. How we have ravaged the environment. :ufdup:



But they never want to speak on social engineering and the people at the top with agendas. Nikka I didn't ask for them to tear down the rainforest to grow palm oil and the nikkas that buy palm oil probably didn't either.

Anything to keep the spotlight off of the truly greedy profiteers at the top who don't care about sustainability or even their customers, but only revenue.

Also, why can't the "experts" agree? Are we headed for a population collapse due to lack of reproduction? Or are we overpopulated?

OR are we just too populated with the kinds of people that the experts don't like? :patrice:

Cause that's what I gather. They need the cacs to get more action but they need the Indians to go.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
71,723
Reputation
14,301
Daps
303,533
Reppin
Toronto
The population should be brought down. But a "scientist" calling for a "population correction" (:mjpls:) is part of the problem. I nominate that dude to be the first to be "corrected".
Scientist is pointing out a situation that can been forecast. How is it part of the problem to analyze, trend forecast and report findings? Just listen to the point. I'm not a scientist and I see the same thing coming down the line.

Given enough warning we can taper off reproduction to curb the issue. However it still wouldn't be enough. There's overcrowded nations like India and Bangladesh that will have extreme crisis related to the combination of global warming resources scarcity with too much population density. It's not time to give a scientist scrutiny.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
71,723
Reputation
14,301
Daps
303,533
Reppin
Toronto
I love how the "experts" and these articles always point the finger at the common individual. Our consumerism. Our fossil fuel use. How we have ravaged the environment. :ufdup:



But they never want to speak on social engineering and the people at the top with agendas. Nikka I didn't ask for them to tear down the rainforest to grow palm oil and the nikkas that buy palm oil probably didn't either.

Anything to keep the spotlight off of the truly greedy profiteers at the top who don't care about sustainability or even their customers, but only revenue.

Also, why can't the "experts" agree? Are we headed for a population collapse due to lack of reproduction? Or are we overpopulated?

OR are we just too populated with the kinds of people that the experts don't like? :patrice:

Cause that's what I gather. They need the cacs to get more action but they need the Indians to go..
:snoop:
Dudes miss the point thinking they are being vigilant when they are blind.

Conspiracies ruined y'all ability to think and reason with logic.

You wrote a bunch of bull about global warming and how it was exposed and the discussion of the reasons behind. That whole shyt is bullshyt. Industries were always blamed for pollution and global warming. People were told how we contributed and how to mitigate the effects. Y'all have become ridiculous with revisionist bullshyt. Straight up lies then falsely implying others came up with said lies.
 
Last edited:

the elastic

livin' outside of the matrix
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
17,586
Reputation
7,451
Daps
79,150
Reppin
the bay/norcal
Given enough warning we can taper off reproduction to curb the issue. However it still wouldn't be enough. There's overcrowded nations like India and Bangladesh that will have extreme crisis related to the combination of global warming resources scarcity with too much population density. It's not time to give a scientist scrutiny.
One world government incoming :francis:

Easier for TPTB to consolidate folks into borderless continents than to kill them off or neuter them en masse. Why would they want to kill off their own labor force?
 

Whore D'oeuvres

Still Trippin
Supporter
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
1,144
Reputation
531
Daps
5,161
Reppin
Soufside
Scientist is pointing out a situation that can been forecast. How is it part of the problem to analyze, trend forecast and report findings? Just listen to the point. I'm not a scientist and I see the same thing coming down the line.

Given enough warning we can taper off reproduction to curb the issue. However it still wouldn't be enough. There's overcrowded nations like India and Bangladesh that will have extreme crisis related to the combination of global warming resources scarcity with too much population density. It's not time to give a scientist scrutiny.
It's always time to give a scientist scrutiny. They can twist the truth and have agendas like anyone else. There could be more than enough for everybody. But only if there weren't so many people with too much. Just like many of the other problems the article points out; the scarcity is man-made as well. And it's not on us. It's on the people who control the lions share of the resources.

And the solution is for overpopulation is for us to "work together" on ways to lower the population. Yeah let's see if the elites are gonna play along.
 
Last edited:

Whore D'oeuvres

Still Trippin
Supporter
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
1,144
Reputation
531
Daps
5,161
Reppin
Soufside
:snoop:
Dudes miss the point thinking they are being vigilant when they are blind.

Conspiracies ruined y'all ability to think and reason with logic.
So I get conflicting information from supposed experts on the same subject and I can't think or reason with logic? I get the point but what am I supposed to do about it? Move off the grid? Stop buying paper towels? Be scared? Nikka please.

Just because you think differently from me, don't come at me trying to down my logic. Move around.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
71,723
Reputation
14,301
Daps
303,533
Reppin
Toronto
It's always time to give a scientist scrutiny. They can twist the truth and have agendas like anyone else. There could be more than enough for everybody. But only if there weren't so many people with too much. Just like many of the other problems the article points out; the scarcity is man-made as well. And it's not on us. It's on the people who control the lions share of the resources.
"They can twist the truth and have agendas" that's why you don't have to take anyone's word in science. Peer review is a thing. :snoop:

Now that last sentence is just :what: it's on everyone. "The people that make resources" who God? We are talking about land fukking water food and how the environment changing and the increased demand affects all that. Breh are you guys real people?

:mindblown:

Yo wtf...
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
71,723
Reputation
14,301
Daps
303,533
Reppin
Toronto
So I get conflicting information from supposed experts on the same subject and I can't think or reason with logic? I get the point but what am I supposed to do about it? Move off the grid? Stop buying paper towels? Be scared? Nikka please.

Just because you think differently from me, don't come at me trying to down my logic. Move around.
:snoop:
 

the elastic

livin' outside of the matrix
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
17,586
Reputation
7,451
Daps
79,150
Reppin
the bay/norcal
K.Schwab.jpg

  • International law is failing to protect climate migrants, and the Refugee Convention of 1951 must be amended to address this, argues a PhD Candidate in Law.
  • Climate change will cause an increasing number of disasters such as floods, droughts and wildfires.
  • Only the creation of an efficient international framework of laws can guarantee refuge for people fleeing such environmental disasters in future, she says.



Get ready for a borderless future, yall :merchant:
 
Top