Be considered dominant while not being athletic at all and getting sonned 2 years in a row on the biggest stage brehs
Steph Curry is NOT DOMINANT. He has a certain aspect of his game the can be dominant but he can be neutralized.
You can't be a dominant player in my opinion and not have a physical component to your game
Read the whole thread before postin dumb shyt nikka I already clarified thatHe didn't get sonned two years in a row wtf are you talking about 26 and 6 is getting sonned
Listen cut all the bullshyt.
If you watched the last 2 Finals Steph was unable to impose his will in either of them. Now you can be on some nerd shyt and throw stats at me with no context for daps but it's not gonna work.
He was unable to impose his will in either series because he has no physical component to his game that would make him dominant. He has that phenomenal jumper but he was neutralized.
Not to mention the fact that he couldn't fukk with the young gawd Kyrie who was comin
Listen cut all the bullshyt.
If you watched the last 2 Finals Steph was unable to impose his will in either of them. Now you can be on some nerd shyt and throw stats at me with no context for daps but it's not gonna work.
He was unable to impose his will in either series because he has no physical component to his game that would make him dominant. He has that phenomenal jumper but he was neutralized.
Not to mention the fact that he couldn't fukk with the young gawd Kyrie who was comin for him
![]()
The nikka only had two two bad games in the first finals and you can't compare Kyrie to curry when Kyrie was getting stuck 1 on 1 a lot of times by curry and curry was getting double and triplet termed Kyrie rarely stuck curry it's levels to this man
So Bron being the leader in everything last year didn't affect the Finals greatly.
How much impact you have on a game isn't through some basic ass box score measurements.
I've been saying this all along
When Steph gets physically dominated in this series by Kyrie it will become more apparent.
When Steph isn't shooting well he doesn't really impact the game .
Kyrie > Steph
This is the epitome of Curry effect all in one play:
You have three guys (Kyrie, Lebron, & Iman) more concerned with Curry on the break than a runaway bull in Durant. Just the gravity he possesses on the court alone makes him a dominant player. Scottie and those that agree with him are flat out WRONG.
I actually agree. Steph's close but he's not there yet.
1) because he can be contained. To me dominant players cannot be contained. They may have one bad game but you can't hold them down an entire series like the Cavs did last year.
2) Hasn't been doing it long enough. Needs to put in work for another couple years.
3) he's a liability on defense.
4) he's not great at enough other things besides scoring. Too one-dimensional.