He shouldn’t be in the White House a second time breh
But he’s there
I bet a farm bailout is attached to the CR in a deal with the Dems
SCOTUS Watch Thread
- Thread starter Hood Critic
- Start date
But he’s there
I bet a farm bailout is attached to the CR in a deal with the Dems
He shouldn't have been in the White House the first time. But his first run was a disaster. This one is speed running the bottom falling out, he certainly doesn't give a shyt about how it impacts anyone but him, and he's not going to suffer from it. He has no incentive to give a shyt. If he follows the law (lol), he can't run again anyway so he'll just crash the economy and plunder on the way out, the way he's done with every business he's ever run. Or he'll just say fukk it and go full king mode and stay in office.
Why would he give a shyt about the Dems getting the house or senate back? They're still not going to be able to get shyt done even if they had a super majority. But they're not going to get that and the GOP will always do as much harm as they can. Plus with the ownership of SCROTUS, the open crimes they can't stop themselves from talking about on TV every day. The bottom is already falling out in large chunks of the country. Trump is definitely NEVER going to give a shyt about that.
1/37
@trouble_man90
He’s signaling that they’re about to fukk our shyt up.
[Quoted tweet]
Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court should take a more critical approach to settled precedent, saying decided cases are not "the gospel" and suggesting some may have been based on "something somebody dreamt up and others went along with." abcnews.link/QjDgSGL
2/37
@Nocturnal
Doesn't he want to get rid of interracial marriage? He's married to a white lady.
3/37
@ClotFreeFrog
Hope so.
4/37
@RaskinsThe
Yup. Exactly.
5/37
@TomsTidbits
Encouraging
6/37
@sheamcvaugh
This is so fukking lit bro, I need this with every fiber of my body
7/37
@Andrew_Bosket
Can’t wait
8/37
@LoesbyForIdaho
9/37
@BK_McCallum
If by "our", you mean the progressive perversions of the constitution thoughout the 20th century, then yes, they are about to fukk your shyt up.
10/37
@Bobbythegreat
The return of the rule of law.
11/37
@the_cat53
Wasn’t overturning Dred Scott a good thing?
12/37
@EyeOnStalk
He’s always been this way. The issue is how many other Justices agree with him? Alito for sure. Probably Kavanaugh. Not sure about Gorsuch.
13/37
@_ThePr0letariat
He’s signaling that the Supreme Court is essentially disbanding
14/37
@zee_gpt
the rot goes far too deep
15/37
@edrushpilot
Dred Scott might disagree with you.
16/37
@esperantorising
You’re about to get got
17/37
@RobertMacD0nald
18/37
@actual_Diogenes
He is growing stronger
19/37
@SnobsScenery
Good
20/37
@Babyro49
Good
21/37
@ArtemisBSG
Yup! Next to go will be, marriage equality, contraception and women’s right to vote - she warned us! We were told we were being alarmist, hysterical, yet, here we are!
22/37
@cdlesniak
Anyone else find it kind of interesting that the conservative SCOTUS justices, who once espoused the virtues of originalism and judicial restraint, have now seemingly adopted the previously disdained notion of judicial activism since they've become a super majority?
23/37
@Gaius_Trey
Awesome, very based
24/37
@GirlKW77
For that man to say “something somebody dreamt up” is the most insane thing I've seen.
All this court has done since 2017 is give shadow docket after shadow docket. There is never any constitutionality, any reasoning, just straight up making law as they go.
25/37
@MrLeMemeLeGreat
GigaThomas
26/37
@abigailsolutely
Wow! So hopeful to hear this! We have to protect this man. He truly is a defender of justice.
27/37
@heritage_USA_
The Civil Rights Movement and Great Society are getting reversed soon
28/37
@teamstillrise
FAFO bytch.
29/37
@BobbiLinnMac
Finally.
30/37
@republicdfender
Dang sure hope so
31/37
@HollowPoint124G
and it's glorious
32/37
@LarrySchwe94560
Good. About time.
33/37
@StrokerAce225
Was it worth it?
34/37
@544pibble
Thomas should be Chief Justice.
35/37
@clonethemac
Good
36/37
@danieldaycrypto
Yes
37/37
@Nobody1978_1
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@trouble_man90
He’s signaling that they’re about to fukk our shyt up.
[Quoted tweet]
Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court should take a more critical approach to settled precedent, saying decided cases are not "the gospel" and suggesting some may have been based on "something somebody dreamt up and others went along with." abcnews.link/QjDgSGL
2/37
@Nocturnal
Doesn't he want to get rid of interracial marriage? He's married to a white lady.
3/37
@ClotFreeFrog
Hope so.
4/37
@RaskinsThe
Yup. Exactly.
5/37
@TomsTidbits
Encouraging
6/37
@sheamcvaugh
This is so fukking lit bro, I need this with every fiber of my body
7/37
@Andrew_Bosket
Can’t wait
8/37
@LoesbyForIdaho
9/37
@BK_McCallum
If by "our", you mean the progressive perversions of the constitution thoughout the 20th century, then yes, they are about to fukk your shyt up.
10/37
@Bobbythegreat
The return of the rule of law.
11/37
@the_cat53
Wasn’t overturning Dred Scott a good thing?
12/37
@EyeOnStalk
He’s always been this way. The issue is how many other Justices agree with him? Alito for sure. Probably Kavanaugh. Not sure about Gorsuch.
13/37
@_ThePr0letariat
He’s signaling that the Supreme Court is essentially disbanding
14/37
@zee_gpt
the rot goes far too deep
15/37
@edrushpilot
Dred Scott might disagree with you.
16/37
@esperantorising
You’re about to get got
17/37
@RobertMacD0nald
18/37
@actual_Diogenes
He is growing stronger
19/37
@SnobsScenery
Good
20/37
@Babyro49
Good
21/37
@ArtemisBSG
Yup! Next to go will be, marriage equality, contraception and women’s right to vote - she warned us! We were told we were being alarmist, hysterical, yet, here we are!
22/37
@cdlesniak
Anyone else find it kind of interesting that the conservative SCOTUS justices, who once espoused the virtues of originalism and judicial restraint, have now seemingly adopted the previously disdained notion of judicial activism since they've become a super majority?
23/37
@Gaius_Trey
Awesome, very based
24/37
@GirlKW77
For that man to say “something somebody dreamt up” is the most insane thing I've seen.
All this court has done since 2017 is give shadow docket after shadow docket. There is never any constitutionality, any reasoning, just straight up making law as they go.
25/37
@MrLeMemeLeGreat
GigaThomas
26/37
@abigailsolutely
Wow! So hopeful to hear this! We have to protect this man. He truly is a defender of justice.
27/37
@heritage_USA_
The Civil Rights Movement and Great Society are getting reversed soon
28/37
@teamstillrise
FAFO bytch.
29/37
@BobbiLinnMac
Finally.
30/37
@republicdfender
Dang sure hope so
31/37
@HollowPoint124G
and it's glorious
32/37
@LarrySchwe94560
Good. About time.
33/37
@StrokerAce225
Was it worth it?
34/37
@544pibble
Thomas should be Chief Justice.
35/37
@clonethemac
Good
36/37
@danieldaycrypto
Yes
37/37
@Nobody1978_1
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Supreme Court Justice Blasts Rise of Vulgarity in Trump’s America
Anthony Kennedy gave a lengthy interview to The New York Times ahead of the publication of his memoir.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
‘War zone’: Multiple federal judges unite in blistering Supreme Court warning
A majority of federal judges who spoke with The New York Times recently – many of them appointed by Republican presidents – are sounding the alarm on the Supreme Court’s increased use of its emergency docket, also known as a “shadow docket,” a process by which rulings are made unsigned, and...
www.rawstory.com
Json
Superstar
So who exactly is staffing these GOP farms like the Heritage Foundation if so many pre-Bush2 judges are against the way rulings are coming down?‘War zone’: Multiple federal judges unite in blistering Supreme Court warning
A majority of federal judges who spoke with The New York Times recently – many of them appointed by Republican presidents – are sounding the alarm on the Supreme Court’s increased use of its emergency docket, also known as a “shadow docket,” a process by which rulings are made unsigned, and...
Where's all the supposed saved money going? Back into the hands of Billionaire 'Americans' only?