So...if I don't watch a press conference with the President saying he wants to bomb Syria and I find out about it by reading the Times or in a forum, I can't be against it because I didn't watch him say it?
" shyt, you're kidding yourself.Sure it's been corrected, but dude made the argument that black QB's are perceived as good because of their athleticism, not their minds/arm (a la manning/brady) which is absolutely true. So much of the media focuses on the athleticism of these QB's, just last season were they forced to lean back a bit and look at the cerebral And passing capabilities of these dudes. This was absolutely correct, no c00ning took place, op should listen to the debate before making threads. And if you think Jamarcus didn't have whites sitting back on some "told you they can't do it
So...Jamarcus is the problem as SAS blamed, not those white SAS ignored and said nothing about for wrongly thinking that way, right? They hold ZERO responsibility for being fukked up in the head ....ONLY Jamarcus.Sure it's been corrected, but dude made the argument that black QB's are perceived as good because of their athleticism, not their minds/arm (a la manning/brady) which is absolutely true. So much of the media focuses on the athleticism of these QB's, just last season were they forced to lean back a bit and look at the cerebral And passing capabilities of these dudes. This was absolutely correct, no c00ning took place, op should listen to the debate before making threads. And if you think Jamarcus didn't have whites sitting back on some "told you they can't do it
Reb, you're arguing to argue. SAS and Skip acknowledged where the black QB position has come from and the challenges, thus them saluting the fact there were 9 starting on Sunday. SAS simply made the point that Jamarcus came out as what was supposed to be the drop back passing black qb, was taken #1 but his antics pushed media/public perception back to where it had been before. His whole spiel abt the white media not acknowledging the minds of these guys and only their athleticism addressed their fukked up frame of thought.So...Jamarcus is the problem as SAS blamed, not those white SAS ignored and said nothing about for wrongly thinking that way, right? They hold ZERO responsibility for being fukked up in the head ....ONLY Jamarcus.
Keep it moving.
Sure it's been corrected, but dude made the argument that black QB's are perceived as good because of their athleticism, not their minds/arm (a la manning/brady) which is absolutely true. So much of the media focuses on the athleticism of these QB's, just last season were they forced to lean back a bit and look at the cerebral And passing capabilities of these dudes. This was absolutely correct, no c00ning took place, op should listen to the debate before making threads. And if you think Jamarcus didn't have whites sitting back on some "told you they can't do it
remember
...i could be wrong about stephen doe--
...
I'm arguing to argue? I'm saying is a shyt argument to place accountability on Jamarcus and not those who carry those sentiments. "I blame Jamarcus for _______________" SAS leaves NO ROOM, VITRIOL OR ARGUMENT for whites that use the guilty by association thing.
and don't know that already.
9 African AMerican quarterbacks starting week 1. Is this the golden age? He blamed Jamarcus Russell and said athleticism is the reason why so many are starting today.
I don't watch First Take anymore but are you paraphrasing?
thats not how it came across tho, he brought up Jamarcus cuz he was talking about black qb perception...they are perceived as good cuz they are athletic, Jamarcus was supposedly supposed to be a drop back qb that broke the perception but his actions placed black qb perception back where it was thus the reason a lot of these young QB's have their athleticism discussed first when he'd like to see them simply discussed as good QB's. But I'm done, I don't like SAS more than the next person and sometimes enjoy throwing people in the c00n pile as well,but when I sat home and saw the debate and see the argument mis-reported here, I had to clarify. Y'all can continue to see it how you wantask yourself why screaming a would be mentioning jamarcus russell within the context of successful black qbs on rosters now...other than race how does jamarcus connect to these working black qbs????...stephen appears to be trying to lower expectations of employed black qbs by including jamarcus in the discussion...like: yeah these new black qbs are good but
I'm not looking for any pats on the back, Im really just relaying the argument SAS made and it wasn't on some c00n shytI'm arguing to argue? I'm saying is a shyt argument to place accountability on Jamarcus and not those who carry those sentiments. "I blame Jamarcus for _______________" SAS leaves NO ROOM, VITRIOL OR ARGUMENT for whites that use the guilty by association thing.
You want to be patted on the back for the pointing out the "And if you think Jamarcus didn't have whites sitting back on some "told you they can't do it" shyt, you're kidding yourself." As if we're all like
Im sorry...blaming a black person for whites lumping all of us as one and the same is pure c00nery.thats not how it came across tho, he brought up Jamarcus cuz he was talking about black qb perception...they are perceived as good cuz they are athletic, Jamarcus was supposedly supposed to be a drop back qb that broke the perception but his actions placed black qb perception back where it was thus the reason a lot of these young QB's have their athleticism discussed first when he'd like to see them simply discussed as good QB's. But I'm done, I don't like SAS more than the next person and sometimes enjoy throwing people in the c00n pile as well,but when I sat home and saw the debate and see the argument mis-reported here, I had to clarify. Y'all can continue to see it how you want
I'm not looking for any pats on the back, Im really just relaying the argument SAS made and it wasn't on some c00n shyt
