Sean "Diddy" Combs Docuseries Produced By 50 Cent Officially Set At Netflix

[Sonic Boom of the South]

I’m sure if Diddy/his team made a documentary from his lens/POV - it would be framed differently and it would be a lot more people being complimentary of him.

A lot of the people in this piece attempt to present themselves as “victims” - but they harbored, hid, supported and enabled his behavior for years - and likely would have continued to do so - had he not fired them or had he not been “cheap” and paid them. Their comments don’t exist in a vacuum.

This documentary was made by Puff's "team".

His dumb ass didn't pay them just like he didn't pay his artists.
So "his team" shopped the documentary around.

Why you think it included all that up close footage of him talking with his lawyers and talking about the upcoming trial?

Why the fukk

 

[Uchiha God]

I hear you, but let’s be real — the industry has been whispering about Diddy for decades. The reason so many people “don’t rock with him” now is because the evidence finally piled up enough for folks to feel safe saying what they already knew.


Using Capricorn Clark actually proves my point. He only stayed around because of money, power, and access — not loyalty. That’s not a “real friend.”

You've not made a point - you said “it’s crazy how many people there is that don’t have a nice thing to say about him”. Were you expecting a documentary titled "The Reckoning" - expounding on sexual assault allegations, civil suits, criminal convictions, alleged involvement in murders, sexual degeneracy and deviancy to be filled of people saying nice things about him? Especially so when the testimonies are largely from people he excommunicated? All I said to you is that context and circumstances considered - there's nothing crazy about that. Other people have quoted you telling you the same.

Diddy is pariah in public perception for being a verifiable domestic abuser, bisexual deviant. There's a segment of this documentary dedicated to a description of a scenario in which he allegedly sexually assaulted an unconscious/non-participant woman. You expected "Diddy's a great guy" commentary in this same piece? Are you really this obtuse?

Capricorn Clark wasn't used as an anchor to tell you that Diddy is loved or has "real friends". I used her to highlight how your rationale can be used both ways. I feel like you're one of them brehs that needs illustrations when having a conversation. Here:

You: "we would see right through it" (about an hypothetical documentary from Diddy's lens, in which he sets the framing of this ordeal)
Me: "what? you think motivations in the current doc aren't easy to see through or something?" (insert Capricorn Clark as an example of the aforementioned)

Do you understand now or?

And Joe Budden literally said he thought Diddy had real friends but “it doesn’t look like many.” That’s not confidence — that’s doubt.

Yes, people partied with him. Yes, the rooms were full. But in Hollywood, being surrounded isn’t the same as being loved. People flock to opportunity, not character.


With the amount of allegations, lawsuits, witness accounts, leaked footage, and the people distancing themselves now — it’s not crazy to think he doesn’t have many real friends left. The pattern says that more than any podcast clip.

Until something truly contradicts all that, I’m standing on what I said.

Your statement - verbatim - was "Diddy has not been able to keep a day one around him" [1] <- I linked the post because you seem to lose track of the things you say

You said nothing about "many". Don't try to change your position like a hoe. You said he hasn't been able to keep a day one and that "he has had too many public falling out for me to believe he has any friends left".

and I replied - "unless you have more insight into his inner circle than most of us - your assertion that he hasn’t been able to keep day ones or that he has no friends left has no validity - the Joe Budden podcast were discussing him/this doc for the past couple episodes and they specifically said that Diddy has some folks and friends around him that have been there for eons."

Here's the Joe Budden Podcast corroborating what I said - going as far as name being dropped in the background:



and this is despite Joe giving you two disclaimers: 1. that he didn't want to look like he was vouching for. and 2. he didn't want to drop people's names

 

[Big Boss]

 

[Illuminatos]

Someone said he’s dancing like he just got away with murder.

 

[Uchiha God]

This documentary was made by Puff's "team".

His dumb ass didn't pay them just like he didn't pay his artists.
So "his team" shopped the documentary around.

Why you think it included all that up close footage of him talking with his lawyers and talking about the upcoming trial?

Why the fukk

The documentary includes footage captured by people he didn't pay nor sign contracts with - that footage was then shopped to where it ultimately ended up. Which is evidence enough the documentary was not made by Puff/his team - hence them denouncing it and attempting to position it as a "hit piece" for damage control.

Exec Producers - 50 Cent, Alex Stapleton, et al
Production Company - G-Unit Films & TV Inc.

 

[King Poetic]

This reminds me of DOC saying on the funky enough he just made up some shyt on the song and the crew was like damn I didn’t know u knew Jamaican patios

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

The documentary includes footage captured by people he didn't pay nor sign contracts with - that footage was then shopped to where it ultimately ended up. Which is evidence enough the documentary was not made by Puff/his team - hence them denouncing it and attempting to position it as a "hit piece" for damage control.

Exec Producers - 50 Cent, Alex Stapleton, et al
Production Company - G-Unit Films & TV Inc.

The footage was captured by people HE hired but didn't pay!

The producers were the people who came in after PUFF stupid ass didn't pay and they did.

How the fukk do you think the footage was obtained?

Do you think it was hidden cameras and Puff had no clue he was being recorded?

No, Puff drug addict, narcissistic ass had them there.

 

[Rayzah]

You've not made a point - you said “it’s crazy how many people there is that don’t have a nice thing to say about him”. Were you expecting a documentary titled "The Reckoning" - expounding on sexual assault allegations, civil suits, criminal convictions, alleged involvement in murders, sexual degeneracy and deviancy to be filled of people saying nice things about him? Especially so when the testimonies are largely from people he excommunicated? All I said to you is that context and circumstances considered - there's nothing crazy about that. Other people have quoted you telling you the same.

Diddy is pariah in public perception for being a verifiable domestic abuser, bisexual deviant. There's a segment of this documentary dedicated to a description of a scenario in which he allegedly sexually assaulted an unconscious/non-participant woman. You expected "Diddy's a great guy" commentary in this same piece? Are you really this obtuse?

Capricorn Clark wasn't used as an anchor to tell you that Diddy is loved or has "real friends". I used her to highlight how your rationale can be used both ways. I feel like you're one of them brehs that needs illustrations when having a conversation. Here:

You: "we would see right through it" (about an hypothetical documentary from Diddy's lens, in which he sets the framing of this ordeal)
Me: "what? you think motivations in the current doc aren't easy to see through or something?" (insert Capricorn Clark as an example of the aforementioned)

Do you understand now or?



Your statement - verbatim - was "Diddy has not been able to keep a day one around him" [1] <- I linked the post because you seem to lose track of the things you say

You said nothing about "many". Don't try to change your position like a hoe. You said he hasn't been able to keep a day one and that "he has had too many public falling out for me to believe he has any friends left".

and I replied - "unless you have more insight into his inner circle than most of us - your assertion that he hasn’t been able to keep day ones or that he has no friends left has no validity - the Joe Budden podcast were discussing him/this doc for the past couple episodes and they specifically said that Diddy has some folks and friends around him that have been there for eons."

Here's the Joe Budden Podcast corroborating what I said - going as far as name being dropped in the background:



and this is despite Joe giving you two disclaimers: 1. that he didn't want to look like he was vouching for. and 2. he didn't want to drop people's names

Your responses are not in good faith
at this point it’s obvious you’re more interested in picking apart wording and ‘winning’ the exchange than actually discussing the doc. You keep twisting what I said into something extreme so you can debate the version of me that exists in your head. That’s cool, but it’s also a waste of my time.

My original point was simple: with all the allegations, public fallouts, and people distancing themselves, it looks like Diddy doesn’t have many real day-ones left. The documentary only reinforces that. That’s my take, and I’m standing on it.


You clearly want this to be a deeper fight than it is, so I’m tapping out here. No need to drag this on any further

 

[Uchiha God]

The footage was captured by people HE hired but didn't pay!

yes, this is what this sentence means - "The documentary includes footage captured by people he didn't pay nor sign contracts with"

The producers were the people who came in after PUFF stupid ass didn't pay and they did.

How the fukk do you think the footage was obtained?

yes, this is what this sentence means - "that footage was then shopped to where it ultimately ended up"

Do you think it was hidden cameras and Puff had no clue he was being recorded?

No, I don't think that.

Besides the press release and cease and desist issued to Netflix by Puff/his team labeling this a hit-piece, they also said it contained stolen and/or illegally obtained footage, to which Netflix replied the footage was obtained legally - Puff speaks directly to the camera multiple times. 50 Cent the executive producer also spoke about how the footage ended up with them in the press run prior to release. This was also covered in multiple podcasts. So the fact that Puff had cameramen following and recording him around isn't "new" or a revelation to anyone.

Capturing footage and making a documentary are different things though. The footage was intended for a documentary made by Puff/his team. Hubris, lapses, idiocy and likely the fact it didn't play out how he expected resulted in said footage not being secured under contracts, thus ending up where it did and with the team that made the documentary - i.e not Puff's

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

yes, this is what this sentence means - "The documentary includes footage captured by people he didn't pay nor sign contracts with"



yes, this is what this sentence means - "that footage was then shopped to where it ultimately ended up"



No, I don't think that.

Besides the press release and cease and desist issued to Netflix by Puff/his team labeling this a hit-piece, they also said it contained stolen and/or illegally obtained footage, to which Netflix replied the footage was obtained legally - Puff speaks directly to the camera multiple times. 50 Cent the executive producer also spoke about how the footage ended up with them in the press run prior to release. This was also covered in multiple podcasts. So the fact that Puff had cameramen following and recording him around isn't "new" or a revelation to anyone.

Capturing footage and making a documentary are different things though. The footage was intended for a documentary made by Puff/his team. Hubris, lapses, idiocy and likely the fact it didn't play out how he expected resulted in said footage not being secured under contracts, thus ending up where it did and with the team that made the documentary - i.e not Puff's

Not even reading whole post. After seeing the sentences you quoted and you agree with me.



The doc was made by mafukkas Puff hired but didn't pay like a dumb ass.
fukk that loser degenerate, fakkit c00n, and ALL with the cape on for him.

Hope he offs himself in his cell.

 

[BK The Great]

 

[H.J.Duck]

Especially the Pac/BIG murder stuff and some things around them seemed too far fetched or the connections documentary tried to make were weird. But there was enough dirty, believable, new shyt here that I cannot believe anyone would defend Puffy. Doesn't matter how much of a hypocrite or sociopath 50 is. Puff deserves whatever the fukk is coming to him like Mark Curry said in the doc

 

[Uchiha God]

After seeing the sentences you quoted and you agree with me.

yes, I did say the doc includes footage captured by people Puff hired but didn't pay nor sign contracts with

The doc was made by mafukkas Puff hired but didn't pay like a dumb ass.

It wasn't. They captured some footage and sold it to the guys that actually made and executive produced the doc

fukk that loser degenerate, fakkit c00n, and ALL with the cape on for him.

Agreed

 

[Sir Richard Spirit]

Doc was trash.

 

[theflyest]

How credible do you think Gene Deal is? Is there any reason to think he's unreliable?

It just depends on the timeline. They stopped working together I believe in the early 2000s, so anything after that is speculation.