Septum Ring Twitter's latest target: Elle Varner

Citi Trends

aka milobased
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,457
Reputation
7,105
Daps
89,090
Reppin
C.I.T.I
you guys don't understand what it's like to be a young girl having the heavy responsibility of mens sexual interest being shoved on you. You see how women are thought of in a sexual way nowadays? It's not kind. At all. And all you're doing is being a kid. And they're basically saying, you have a lustful body and if something happens to you, you provoked it. You attracted that attention. Someone with an interest towards an underdeveloped human being is healthy and normal and the only thing you have to do to prevent it is wear your skirts a little bit longer.
what in the absolute fukk are you talking about?
Boys have the same goddamn dress codes, he cant come without a belt and sagging pants or he'll be sent some. All this extra dumb shyt you're spouting makes no sense and you're literally just making things up to argue against.

What do you mean all they're doing is being a kid? They're dressing inappropriately and being sent home for it. The principal is not there to teach your fukking child the magic of her fukking vagina, teach your child how to dress for school.
They dont call them dirty sluts when they send them home, they get sent home just like a boy would if he came in a damn wife beater and some basketball shorts.

Literally no one said anything about provoking an attack or adults being attracted to kids. Are they supposed to let the children walk around in ass-less chaps and g-strings because they dont know what sex is about?
No one at school should be teaching your kid about sexual spirituality or w/e the fukk you're talking about. You tell them all that BS at home and send them to school accordingly or they're getting sent home

i know feminists are dumb but jesus christ
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
1,214
Reputation
320
Daps
4,469
what in the absolute fukk are you talking about?
Boys have the same goddamn dress codes, he cant come without a belt and sagging pants or he'll be sent some. All this extra dumb shyt you're spouting makes no sense and you're literally just making things up to argue against.

What do you mean all they're doing is being a kid? They're dressing inappropriately and being sent home for it. The principal is not there to teach your fukking child the magic of her fukking vagina, teach your child how to dress for school.
They dont call them dirty sluts when they send them home, they get sent home just like a boy would if he came in a damn wife beater and some basketball shorts.

Literally no one said anything about provoking an attack or adults being attracted to kids. Are they supposed to let the children walk around in ass-less chaps and g-strings because they dont know what sex is about?
No one at school should be teaching your kid about sexual spirituality or w/e the fukk you're talking about. You tell them all that BS at home and send them to school accordingly or they're getting sent home

i know feminists are dumb but jesus christ
how many confused ass nikkas are gonna quote me about this shyt :snoop:

listen:
  • rules are rules, follow the rules
  • children are children, whether the child is wearing clothing that you find inappropriate, that doesn't give you the right to strip them of their status as children. Don't speak of them inappropriately, do not call them sexually aggressive names, do not assume things about them in a sexual or adult nature. It's inappropriate. They are CHILDREN. UNDERAGE. NOT ADULT.
thats all I was saying you idiot. Save all that fakkit faux outrage and venting for some dumb twitter bytch who will argue with you. Have a nice friday. :pacspit:
 

Citi Trends

aka milobased
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,457
Reputation
7,105
Daps
89,090
Reppin
C.I.T.I
how many confused ass nikkas are gonna quote me about this shyt :snoop:

listen:
  • rules are rules, follow the rules
  • children are children, whether the child is wearing clothing that you find inappropriate, that doesn't give you the right to strip them of their status as children. Don't speak of them inappropriately, do not call them sexually aggressive names, do not assume things about them in a sexual or adult nature. It's inappropriate. They are CHILDREN. UNDERAGE. NOT ADULT.
thats all I was saying you idiot. Save all that fakkit faux outrage and venting for some dumb twitter bytch who will argue with you. Have a nice friday. :pacspit:
words are not "stripping their status as children". being dressed like a thot is :heh: you're the only one fake outraged here, in here making up these dumbass slogans and shyt:heh:
 

KENNY DA COOKER

HARD ON HOES is not a word it's a LIFESTYLE
Supporter
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
31,450
Reputation
13,251
Daps
168,627
Reppin
F
she been trending for 5+ hours straight :damn: crazy how these women turned on her :francis:


when RATCHETS ATTACK!!!

we live in a age..where the THOTS feel they are winning and any disagreement to them is an attack on thier lifestyle

#stripper job fairs in atl

#nikki minaj being seen as a woman of empowerment

#women promoting the emasculating of men for thier entertainment and role reversal

shyt is outta hand

these hoes be acting up..cause these simps be letting em
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
1,214
Reputation
320
Daps
4,469
words are not "stripping their status as children". being dressed like a thot is :heh: you're the only one fake outraged here, in here making up these dumbass slogans and shyt:heh:
yeah it is but you're much of a bitter fakkit to not have a kneejerk reaction to anything that doesn't comdemn someone who is female
young boys wearing urban fashion aren't thugs and girls wearing tight clothes or shorts aren't thots
you won't even have children and you're sitting here pretending like what you're saying is for their best interests, nikka all you want to do is argue with a bytch about something
you don't give a fukk about kids, fukk off :camby:
 

Citi Trends

aka milobased
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,457
Reputation
7,105
Daps
89,090
Reppin
C.I.T.I
yeah it is but you're much of a bitter fakkit to not have a kneejerk reaction to anything that doesn't comdemn someone who is female
young boys wearing urban fashion aren't thugs and girls wearing tight clothes or shorts aren't thots
you won't even have children and you're sitting here pretending like what you're saying is for their best interests, nikka all you want to do is argue with a bytch about something
you don't give a fukk about kids, fukk off :camby:
who called a boy a thug or a girl a thot? there you go making up things again :heh:
do you sit in your housecoatt and slippers and dream up shyt to argue against in your head? :heh:

you're in here more angry about some imaginary mean words you dreamed up than the actual state of affairs of children coming up and their over-sexualization because of dumbasses like you and people who think its cool to be slutty and mean if you say anything:heh:

im sorry a nikka slapped your ass in 8th grade but its time to get over it sweetheart :heh:
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
1,214
Reputation
320
Daps
4,469
who called a boy a thug or a girl a thot? there you go making up things again :heh:
do you sit in your housecoatt and slippers and dream up shyt to argue against in your head? :heh:

you're in here more angry about some imaginary mean words you dreamed up than the actual state of affairs of children coming up and their over-sexualization because of dumbasses like you and people who think its cool to be slutty and mean if you say anything:heh:

im sorry a nikka slapped your ass in 8th grade but its time to get over it sweetheart :heh:
you keep trying these corny strawmen. Save that simple shyt for twitter.
If the responsibility is on kids to maintain an appropriate appearance at all times, it's on us all adults to maintain a protective and appropriate mindset in regards to them. And I understand being an incel manchild keeps you from understanding the concept of shared responsibility but you need to try harder. You're going hard about their clothes but you think it's cool to refer to them with sexually demeaning terms. You are confused. You're talking about the sexualization of children but you're arguing with me because I said we should not sexualize them in our outlook. How we see them matters, you short sighted fool. fukking dumbass, don't even speak on the oversexualization of children. I HATE the oversexualization of children. I don't like kids dressing in revealing clothes. I never fukking once said that was okay. I was talking about OUR RESPONSIBILITY and fukking dumbasses pushing OUR RESPONSIBILITY for their physical and mental health on them.

but this isn't a discussion thats going to work with some keyboard misogynist getting his dikk hard fighting bytches on a friday. Enjoy typing out the asspull deflection response you type for the sake of arguing you attention starved bytch
 

Citi Trends

aka milobased
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,457
Reputation
7,105
Daps
89,090
Reppin
C.I.T.I
but you think it's cool to refer to them with sexually demeaning terms.
still never did that. you are delusional and you need to stay off tumblr.

i agree this is going nowhere because you're an imbecile and insist on arguing a point you've completely made up and want desperately for me to be some awkward misogynist so you can feel better. So i'll end it here and let you go back to mouth breathing.

honestly its my fault for assuming you were competent in the first place. just make sure you have a good cry about the patriarchy with your kid(if you're even fertile) when the principal sends her home for wearing a latex catsuit :salute:
 
Top