Serious but idiotic question about the POTUS?

Soon

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
2,104
Reputation
788
Daps
4,628
didn't even think about that for some reason. makes perfect sense now.

thanks.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits

In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

The game is the game. :cheers:
 

Music Fiend

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
6,073
Reputation
1,135
Daps
16,685
The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits

In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

The game is the game. :cheers:

Spooky. It's like IG thots are tryna take a page from the real movers and shakers. Yikes. I guess the game pertains to more than one avenue.
 
Top