Seriously why is American music trash right now.

JustCKing

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
26,157
Reputation
4,339
Daps
49,931
Reppin
NULL
DMX was great because he had talent. If trash people consider trash artists like fred durst a good artist, that don't mean he was a good artist. Same fans liking garbage and good stuff don't validate garbage as the good stuff.

Would you consider movies like epic movie/meet the spartans great films? Because some think they're great while all reviews say they suck.

There are a sector of fans who don't think highly of DMX. They view him the same way people try to downplay Pac: he wasn't lyrical.

So you think Method Man and DJ Premier are trash people too. They got a song with him. E-40 and Eightball & MJG are on a song with him too.

A LOT of classic Hip Hop albums have reviews that were critically panned.
 

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
20,036
Reputation
5,407
Daps
87,297
So you think Method Man and DJ Premier are trash people too. They got a song with him. E-40 and Eightball & MJG are on a song with him too.

A LOT of classic Hip Hop albums have reviews that were critically panned.
Great musicians make all types of business moves. Limp bizkit fanboys liked some of the rap, so of course rappers would jump on the track or do the remix. That fred durst Method Man song is possibly the worst song Method Man has been on.

Put it this way, low quality music usually has a quick expiration date and limp bizkit were only popular for 3 years. Great musicians stay relevant for longer.
 

JustCKing

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
26,157
Reputation
4,339
Daps
49,931
Reppin
NULL
Great musicians make all types of business moves. Limp bizkit fanboys liked some of the rap, so of course rappers would jump on the track or do the remix. That fred durst Method Man song is possibly the worst song Method Man has been on.

Put it this way, low quality music usually has a quick expiration date and limp bizkit were only popular for 3 years. Great musicians stay relevant for longer.

You're not making any sense. Drake is over a decade in. He's out lasted artists that are actually musicians let alone greats.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,129
Reppin
the ether
it's actually the opposite, there is no formula anymore thanks to social media and the internet


This isn't true, Spotify and others have literally bought their own data analytics firms and algorithms dominate how most people are introduced to music now. Formulas play a heavy role in which music is produced, how it is produced, how it reaches the consumer, and how it goes viral.






the difference is the number of options we have...

as a teen, i had brandy, monica, and aalyiah - that's what the labels backed and who was on the video channels. a teen now can go on youtube, spotify/apple, or soundcloud and find 1000 aaliyah's, monicas and brandys...yes, attention is fragmented but not because of demand, it's because of the options consumers have


Counterintuitively, this is part of the problem. The more choices there are, the simpler and more formulaic a song has to be in order to get enough attention to rise to the top. Back when there were fewer choices, it was easier for complex and novel songs to hang around enough and get enough listens that they eventually became popular. But now in a world with a billion choices and attention widely scattered, it has become far more difficult for anything different or complex to succeed, because when something is different it takes longer for people to realize they like it. Thus all the interesting shyt is getting swamped out by the familiar generic crap that fits the formula.



In years when more novel song choices were produced, the average lyrical simplicity of the songs entering U.S. billboard charts was greater. This cross-temporal relationship was robust when controlling for a range of cultural and ecological factors and employing multiverse analyses to control for potentially confounding influence of temporal autocorrelation. Finally, simpler songs entering the charts were more successful, reaching higher chart positions, especially in years when more novel songs were produced. The present results suggest that cultural transmission depends on the amount of novel choices in the information landscape.
 
Last edited:

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,303
Reputation
15,278
Daps
100,642
Reppin
CHICAGO
There are a sector of fans who don't think highly of DMX. They view him the same way people try to downplay Pac: he wasn't lyrical.

So you think Method Man and DJ Premier are trash people too. They got a song with him. E-40 and Eightball & MJG are on a song with him too.

A LOT of classic Hip Hop albums have reviews that were critically panned.


This whole post thread of yours.

Is why you never made any relevant reviews or posts..


This kind of thinking plagues thecoli.com and human life. People walking around signifying and do not know wtf they talembout. Yet trying to act like.
since they partake in a forum with no actual content worth a damn. Like they know or made an actual critique and never made any real critique.

If so.

Post who you discovered and their reviews.
Or post someone and you fueled their charge to blow up.


I will wait.

When I know it will be another quarter century and surrounded by people signifying and not ever doing.

Even when they can post some words at their leisure and comfortability tho.



Art Barr
 

FS4LFE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
14,506
Reputation
2,343
Daps
69,614
Like others said… I blame the consumers. If people stopped making garbage artist hot then we wouldn’t have this problem.
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,303
Reputation
15,278
Daps
100,642
Reppin
CHICAGO
Really this argument is one that encompasses everything and can be applied to eveything. Once the culture of hiphop was purposefully allowed by the rest of the general youse to occur. Instead of actually being accepting of a nonviolent culture.
that would have saved you. Instead youse,....
the general youse's allowed this to occur.
all becaUse you wanted to misappropriate.
as culture theives and toys in masses.

Then eventually take and seek refuge.
to hide behind the computer database as a scapegoat.

Which is simply known to anyone since the genesis of the spread sheet to database 123. That the scapegoat reason everything suffers in a database 123 world is.

No one after a given point.
can bring you to the database and clearly show you.
how or why you should look for this or that.


That is the problem with everything in America.

Once it embraced the spreadsheet without proper guidance.
Plus this caveat.

It was heading for ruin.
Especially once this caveat gained mass widespread acceptance.
as the eventual scapegoat.

The question you have for yourself is.

So now,....
do you ,...
do the due diligence.
To fully gain knowledge of self.

Despite knowing and being prescient to this.


As you are living in a world of complete ill free thought. Of the likes of everyone you will now encounter. Is from a channel straight off the Rick and Morty intergalactic Cable box.
living in live united states domestic clockwork orange color.



Art Barr
 
Last edited:

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,952
Reputation
17,315
Daps
276,270
Reppin
Oakland
This isn't true, Spotify and others have literally bought their own data analytics firms and algorithms dominate how most people are introduced to music now. Formulas play a heavy role in which music is produced, how it is produced, how it reaches the consumer, and how it goes viral.









Counterintuitively, this is part of the problem. The more choices there are, the simpler and more formulaic a song has to be in order to get enough attention to rise to the top. Back when there were fewer choices, it was easier for complex and novel songs to hang around enough and get enough listens that they eventually became popular. But now in a world with a billion choices and attention widely scattered, it has become far more difficult for anything different or complex to succeed, because when something is different it takes longer for people to realize they like it. Thus all the interesting shyt is getting swamped out by the familiar generic crap that fits the formula.


not sure what the first link is supposed to prove other than spotify diversifying to keep people in their ecosystem. also didn't see what point the third was making in re: to music.

link 2 speaks on trends the artists themselves have adopted to respond to the current market - ie shorter songs - and about using DS to curate music based on your tastes, not formulaic hits. the lists spotify curates for me is full of shyt that's not what's hot in the mainstream because most of what i listen to isn't mainstream. industry people spoke directly on how trying to design hits is failing to establish stars - it works to some degree with artists who build their own followings - like weeknd teaming with max martin and doja with dr luke, two dudes known for creating a winning formula, but both did the heavy lifting to build their followings before labels gave them real resources. on the flip, people with no following flop to high heavens while trying to follow a formula.


there's no date on that today's artists being uniform - that may ring true in some ways, ie tons of dudes on trap beats, but things like that have always been true, no one said trends, or hot sounds don't exist anymore, but it's artist driven, not labels. labels don't have the same involvement with artists, outside of superstars, and many of them have a lot more control than in the past.


song lyrics being simpler - again, another artist thing, you see this with people who are still young and raw, no writers and producers creating for them. you're not paying attention to all these artists that exist and build before a big label ever signs/distributes them. you're trying to attribute common trends it music to the labels when artists are doing it themselves.




this article reflects the reality of music now Too Many Songs, Not Enough Hits: Pop Music Is Struggling to Create New Stars, finally, gen z is not beholden to even streaming. socials, communal interests (subreddits and discord), and YouTube (organic, not YT music) are how they find music and how they grow songs into hits - NBA Youngboy is a product of that as is Bad Habits or the random resurfacing of old ass songs. there's way more driving music trends and hits today than 20 years ago when you could successfully create 2-4 renditions of the same thing following a forumla ( britney vs christina, avril vs pink, n sync vs backstreet vs 98 degrees, etc)


ETA: there are 5 songs in the Billboard top 20 right now that I can identify as being there because of SM - Ice Spice & Pink Pantheress, Coi Leray, Chris Brown 4 yr old album cut, an 11 yr old single from Miguel and a 7 yr old single from Weeknd all (re)gained life due to SM...the labels aint running shyt
 
Last edited:

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
20,036
Reputation
5,407
Daps
87,297
You're not making any sense. Drake is over a decade in. He's out lasted artists that are actually musicians let alone greats.
Drake is one of exceptions. He's got a big marketing team, writers, etc. and they create a safe sound music that caters to the average consumer. He's also lucky to be in the era with low expectation bar where not enough people call him out for stealing ideas from indie artists and things like that. And he's not at the complete bottom of musicians such as durst, tekashi, etc.

What about other mediocre artists who were popular back in 2012/13? How come 10 years later most of them aren't as relevant as they used to. You said there's no bad music right? What's Tyga, Chief Keef, Wale, French Montana, Big Sean, Ace Hood, Schoolboy Q and other mediocre rappers up to these days?

Oh yeah I forgot about that Vybz Kartel wannabe, Future, he looks like he still has a relevant career like Drake making same music he's been making for 10+ years. There you go, two guys.


My point is, most of these low quality or mediocre artists are expendable assets. They make a few popular tracks and others step in their place. When you have entire music industries with such swappable artists that are too lazy to work on their craft, the music loses it's quality real fast.
 
Last edited:

SNG

Superstar
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
14,356
Reputation
2,747
Daps
51,046
Reppin
NULL


This the most un Harlem track I’ve heared in a minute. Lick on the Gooch.

:what:

Ain’t no Hetero nikkaz using this terminology. This what American nikkaz be on?
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
63,042
Reputation
9,086
Daps
200,483
Reppin
BX, NYC
It’s true quality is subjective and the music coming out now is simply reflective of our current society.

To be an artist nowadays it takes less talent you don’t need to know how to play instruments, you don’t need to be a great singer, and lyrics that are catchy and relatable are likely to go further than something lyrically dense, so you don’t have to be a great writer to be a successful artist. There’s more music now at your finger tips than ever its up to the consumer to find their niches.

All these global genres take note from America anyway and streaming has allowed for international markets to rise.
 

thernbroom

Superstar
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
17,364
Reputation
1,579
Daps
45,462
Lol trash culture just like maino and Troy Ave beef and the music coming from it :deadrose:
 
Top