Sessions is ramping up the war on drugs

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,892
Reputation
4,778
Daps
123,523
Reppin
Detroit
AG Sessions paves way for stricter sentencing in criminal cases

By Laura Jarrett, CNN



Updated 6:09 AM ET, Fri May 12, 2017

(CNN)Attorney General Jeff Sessions has a new directive for federal prosecutors across the country: charge suspects with the most serious offense you can prove.

Friday's announcement follows a line of several other significant departures from Obama-era domestic policies at the Justice Department, but this decision crystalized Sessions' position in the criminal justice realm.

In a brief one-and-a-half-page memo, Sessions outlined his new instructions for charging decisions in federal cases, saying that his new first principle is "that prosecutors should charge and pursue the most serious, readily provable offense."


"The most serious offenses are those that carry the most substantial guidelines sentence, including mandatory minimum sentences," Sessions later adds.

While the federal sentencing guidelines are advisory -- and take into account everything from a defendant's criminal history to cooperation with authorities -- some judges have felt handcuffed by mandatory minimums, which provide a statutory sentencing minimum of months below which the judge cannot depart.

Sessions also formally withdrew a signature part of Attorney General Eric Holder's "Smart on Crime" initiative, which sought to target the most serious crimes and reduce the number of defendants charged with non-violent drug offenses that would otherwise trigger mandatory minimum sentences.

"We must ensure that our most severe mandatory minimum penalties are reserved for serious, high-level, or violent drug traffickers," Holder wrote in a 2013 memo. "In some cases, mandatory minimum and recidivist enhancements statutes have resulted in unduly harsh sentences and perceived or actual disparities that do not reflect our Principles of Federal Prosecution."

As a result, during the Obama era, federal prosecutors were instructed not to charge someone for a drug crime that would trigger a mandatory minimum sentence if certain specific factors were met: (a) the relevant conduct didn't involve death, violence, a threat of violence or possession of a weapon; (b) the defendant wasn't an organizer, leader or manager of others within a criminal organization; (c) there were no ties to large-scale drug trafficking operations; and (d) the defendant didn't have a "significant" criminal history (i.e., prior convictions).

All of those charging factors are now gone under Sessions' reign and not surprising, as he has previously telegraphed his desire to prosecute more federal cases generally.

The effects of Friday's decision are likely to be felt most immediately in the narcotics context where federal mandatory minimums established by Congress can be harsh for even first-time offenders because the sentences are dictated based on drug type and quantity.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/12/politics/sessions-criminal-charging-memo/index.html?adkey=bn


I've said it again, #Trumpset should be fukking ashamed of themselves for supporting this bullshyt
full


Can't believe somebody on here had the nerve to say this administration was pro-black.
 
Last edited:

Bleed The Freak

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
14,076
Reputation
1,835
Daps
50,374
Who didn't see this coming? Where the fukk did this myth get perpetuated that law enforcement and prosecutors have their "hands cuffed" or are restricted in their ability to fight crime? I'm no conspiracy theorist but their prison pals and private prison CEO's don't like the dwindling numbers...this ain't fukkin La Quinta.

The fukkin US has more prisoners than some countries have populations, sentences more people to death row and has more cops than any other country. Where the fukk can't they do their job?
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
21,272
Reputation
5,578
Daps
91,347
Reppin
The Arsenal
every time i see posts like this i'm reminded that in 8 years (like the smart posters on the coli have been saying) obama and his admin didn't do anything. you only reverse actions taken by the previous admin when they didn't do anything right? that's like super trump logic. it's too bad eric holder and obama didn't come up with a creative name for this "Smart on Crime" effort and call it the "Arrest less black people initiative" and then maybe they could have sold this as doing something for black people and then black turnout might have increased because we would have felt like because of that wording shyt done changed. oh well like trump said black people didn't have anything to lose because obama didn't do anything so there is no difference to black people whether or not it's holder or lynch vs sessions.

MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!
 
Top