Sessions: 'We don't need to be legalizing marijuana'

[Pressure]

thank god for wikileaks

WikiLeaks Shows Hillary Clinton Was Against Pot Legalization In 'All Senses Of the Word'

in an email circulated among senior Clinton campaign staffers concerned about the content of Clinton's paid corporate speeches and appearances—which includes an 80-page attachment detailing "a lot of policy positions that we should give an extra scrub"—a brief portion of Clinton's Q & A with Xerox CEO Ursula Burns in 2014 shows Clinton's staunch opposition to any form of marijuana legalization:

URSULA BURNS: So long means thumbs up, short means thumbs down; or long means I support, short means I don't. I'm going to start with — I'm going to give you about ten long-shorts.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Even if you could make money on a short, you can't answer short.

URSULA BURNS: You can answer short, but you got to be careful about letting anybody else know that. They will bet against you. So legalization of pot?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Short in all senses of the word. (emphasis added)



fukk you, and fukk your hypocritical whore of a politician. she was never on our side, you piece of shyt

What does a this have to do with Sessions? Sounds like you're continuing to take shots at Hillary, who is no longer in government, instead of focusing on what the current government is doing in order to justify your knee-jerk vote.

 

[the cac mamba]

What does a this have to do with Sessions? Sounds like you're continuing to take shots at Hillary, who is no longer in government, instead of focusing on what the current government is doing in order to justify your knee-jerk vote.

actually, it was a direct response to napoleon bringing up whilary in this thread under false pretenses

so maybe you should ask him

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

this was behind closed doors. this is not talking points

Again. She's a public figure. She knows how interviews are handled and how all statements are treated.

The same way Obama was "against" legalization is the same way she would have been.

She literally was the way forward on weed.

 

[the cac mamba]

Again. She's a public figure. She knows how interviews are handled and how all statements are treated.

The same way Obama was "against" legalization is the same way she would have been.

She literally was the way forward on weed.

youre absolutely shameless

whillarys pharma benefactors would have never allowed her to make any progress on weed, and you fukkin know it

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

youre absolutely shameless

whillarys pharma benefactors would have never allowed her to make any progress on weed, and you fukkin know it

the same way Obama did?

Heres the problem.

You REFUSE to acknowledge the nuance and the depth needed to navigate a topic like that on a presidential level.

 

[the cac mamba]

the same way Obama did?

Heres the problem.

You REFUSE to acknowledge the nuance and the depth needed to navigate a topic like that on a presidential level.

no i dont obama was still cowardly on marijuana

he could have made honest statements. of course he wasnt gonna legalize it , but his 'progress' was hot garbage

 

[choc_cardigan]

Don't feed the trolls

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

no i dont obama was still cowardly on marijuana

he could have made honest statements. of course he wasnt gonna legalize it , but his 'progress' was hot garbage

Baby steps.

 

[Pressure]

Jeff Sessions: 'Medical marijuana has been hyped, maybe too much'

@the cac mamba

 

[the cac mamba]

Jeff Sessions: 'Medical marijuana has been hyped, maybe too much'

@the cac mamba

im done with this argument. you win, and i accept jefferson sessions as our new overlord. he cannot be stopped and he's completely infallible. are you happy?

 

[Pressure]

That's not how foot on neck season works.

You asked us to let you know when Trump's policies affect you.

 

[the cac mamba]

That's not how foot on neck season works.

You asked us to let you know when Trump's policies affect you.

me, us. i dont see anyone being affected by what you just posted where they at?

 

[714562]

You REFUSE to acknowledge the nuance and the depth needed to navigate a topic like that on a presidential level.

Catering to old fuddy-duddys is not "nuance" or "depth." It's political triangulation. Triangulation is not what this country needs. It needs bold, principled, liberal leadership.

 

[the cac mamba]

Catering to old fuddy-duddys is not "nuance" or "depth." It's political triangulation. Triangulation is not what this country needs. It needs bold, principled, liberal leadership.

it was cowardice

sessions actually feels this way about marijuana. obama doesn't, which is why i voted for him. he gave us nothing on the issue, but napoleon never misses a chance to suck on his cock

 

[Pirius Black]

Elections have consequences.