Why not?
It has been a proven ratings and buyrate success and brought tons of classic moments. What reasons do you have for being against it?
Undertaker has been a part time attraction for over a decade now, did you have a problem when he did it?
And would you have had a similar problem with Batista winning the title because THAT was the original plan for WM30?
Rock and Brock both brought tons fo attention and boosted buyrates and ratings by holding the title and being back around. This is a business, the goal is to draw money. Once again, why is this a bad thing?
We don't dislike Rollins, nobody here has said anything BAD about Rollins as a performer. What we don't RESPECT is him speaking out of turn regarding something that doesn't effect him in the guise of jealousy. Rollins comments had him acting like a punk bytch and we don't like punk bytches.
You are taking the words of one guy with more credit than the words, actions and track records of countless others that say different. Everyone that has interacted with The Rock has said NOTHING BUT glowing words about him, even Cena and Punk who BOTH originally had harsh criticism turned around and spoke very highly of him. Jericho's SMALL comments didn't even say or mark anything out of character as Rock was treated like a celebrity guest and not a wrestler. You are speculating on how Rock's actions COULD be taken instead of focusing on facts of what he's actually done, which up to this point is very little to seem aloof.
What it sounds like is these guys can't seem to understand Rock IS a celebrity guest and not an on site contractor like them, so his standards are different.
Let me stop you right here because what you are doing now is mentally creating an image of what is going on rather than assessing only what is reported. This is not factual, its speculation.
You are missing the point and glossing over the details.
the difference between Rock and Batista was that Rock was embraced and wanted by the fans and some of the talent backstage got upset. Batista was REJECTED by the fans, yet embraced by the other talent.
Fact is, these guys all work for the company and are their to entertain the fans. Its not the talent's job to make decisions about what is best for the company, there job is to go out there and perform what their told. Rollins or ANYBODY speaking out about what another man does or should/shouldn't do is overstepping their boundaries and NOT something worthy of respect.
AH! There we go, here is the root of the problem, you are still one of the scorned fans who take what you hear word for word and never forgave Rock for leaving.
Do you remember The Rock's promo in the mountains, do I need to link it up again? Rock ALREADY addressed this. When he said he "was never leaving" it didn't mean he was going to be back for every single show and its ridiculous if you even believe that. His words were meant that he was never going to leave and distance himself from the product like he had in the prior 7 years, which he HAS held true to since.
Tell me, why would you bring up this answered and irrelevant talking point if you were not scorned?
This is all speculation. You don't know Rollins and you don't know his motivations. None of us do. To even make up reason of why Rollins would speak out of turn like this about someone else, speaks more to what your real goals are...
You seem to be giving Rollins EVERY benefit of the doubt but automatically assuming the worst about The Rock and his actions. Tell me, why do you keep playing favorites and going off double standards? Do you feel the need to take up for your white brethren?
this thread shouldn't be this long you would of thought he called him nicca or something
