Shaq doubles down on winning without Kobe:” I coulda won 3 in a row with Vince “.

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,344
Reputation
1,303
Daps
60,271
In Pau's last full season in Memphis they were 22-60 with Mike Miller averaging 18 and had Rudy Gay who was 3rd in ROY voting.
In Pau’s last “full season” he missed nearly 30 games to start the year after breaking his foot during the FIBA tournament during the offseason then was placed on a minutes restriction :russ: Kobe cultists would know thus if they actually knew about NBA basketball instead of the Bible of Mamba LMAO.….


On the flipside their god went 28-38 in his first full season after Shaq left his ass to go win another ring without him….that was with Caron Butler and Lamar Odonlm… two players better than anyone Pau ever played with in Memphis :lolbron:What a fukking stereotypical idiot….Cultists living up to their embarrassing reputation as usual
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
83,861
Reputation
26,083
Daps
376,079
The ring thing always need to be contextualized...

Deep down, all basketball heads understand that you have to contextualize rings, because nobody under the age of 70 has Bill Russell as the GOAT. Nobody says Hondo or Pippen are Top 10. That in itself, is proof that mf's know how to compartmentalize rings, people just go dumb to win an argument. Any person who flatly says, "_____ has more rings than ____", isn't really worth having a discussion with.

How these guys won their rings matters and there is nobody who considers rings won as a #2 or #3 or role player, greater than the rings someone won as a #1.

Nobody argues anything for James Worthy being high on the list, and Worthy has more rings than Wilt, and the same amount as Bird. But nobody makes no stupid ring argument because Worthy's 3 rings won are not the same weight as Moses or Dirk's single ring.

Rings matter a great deal, but you have to consistently apply the standard you set. If having more rings than the next guy is the standard, then that standard should be held across the board, because none of the people, that people under 70 argue for GOAT, have the most rings.

If nikkas not holding a consistent standard they may as well not even mention anyone's rings at all...
:wow:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,496
Reputation
-2,229
Daps
17,841
That shyt he did in Houston was all empty calories

That shyt was McDonalds for dinner nikka none a that shyt he did there had any nutritional value :hhh:

None a that shyt was real. Kobe said that nobody can win championships playing like that and he was 100% correct. That MVP he got was pure popcorn, please dog:scust:

The NBA MVP is a narrative award the media made mistakes all the time with who they voted for to win

Stop using that bytch ass nikka in your arguments

He was not fukkin with D Wade and he wasn't as good as T Mac in his prime in Orlando

:scust:
If you call what Harden did empty calories then TMacs accomplishments must be poison :scust:

It doesn't matter how you FEEL about Harden's game because people have negative opinions about about Mac's game too Reality is that James led his teams better in the regular season and led them further in the playoffs than TMac ever did. Harden won more and accomplished more yet you think he cant get compared to Wade. TMac accomplished NOTHING and you think he can be compared to Kobe who is better than Wade?
:camby:

I was just pointing out the contradiction....
Yes. Going in on Kyrie co-signing Alex Jones a d dusty Israelite. Im quite fine with that.

@10bandz dikkriding you isnt a surprise as his track record for c00ning is consistent.

He’ll overlook your next coli ban, Im sure.

And none of those other players were as dominant as Shaq. Who didnt know that it was a matter of time before Shaq was to get rings before we ever heard of Kobe? Took an expansion team to championship contenders. Played so dominant the league implemented zone to stop him. All of a sudden, other names you mention are his peers impact wise? No…they werent. It isnt sacrilegious to think another great wing player along shaq and Phil would lead to ships. But yall insist on making Shaq’s ships a “kobe only” thing in your cult like obsession.

Racist against who? Where's the posts? You'll just keep saying this without bringing even ONE post..

its irrelevant what you call dominant because he needed all time SG's to win. Why? Because he couldnt close games hisself. I posted a video where he said he was scared to take the last shot at 25 and Kobe (at 18)was the only one willing to. That says all about their time together. But that isn't the point. The point was that fans of teams appreciate the contributions the players brought to the team. Again, Ive never heard a Spurs fan say "we could win with KG like we did with Duncan." I've never heard one make arguments that Duncan's accomplishments are replaceable either...

How is saying that Kobe was 1A to Shaq mean that it's a "kobe only" championship? It's "sacrilegious" to say that someone that never accomplished anything could step into a position and automatically get the same results. It's "sacrilegious" to say that someone that was admittedly a lazy practice player, could step into the shoes of someone with work ethic and accomplish the same things. TMac didnt play defense and didnt have the intangibles of a great leader. And because that is undoubtedly true, you have to pretend that Phil Jackson wouldn't supernaturally implant these things in TMac. Even though Shaq was lazy and selfish while Phil was there...

And there's levels to greatness. TMac's "greatness" isn't the same as Kobe's greatness. People clown Harden for choking yet his career has lapped everything TMac did even when healthy...TMac is a Marbury/Steve Francis type of great.He cant compare to players that actually accomplished something beyond having viral in game moments or scoring the ball well for a couple of seasons while going nowhere...
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,496
Reputation
-2,229
Daps
17,841
I had a 10 page “debate” in the lounge with dude because he believes every gothic building built from 1890 on was actual a lost civilization who built it. Buildings like the Boston post office. :mjlol:

Oh that's where your clown ass is from? Does it hurt your feelings when people question cacs version of history? :mjcry::mjlol:


Yet you rock with a habitual banned for racism user in @Everythingg

:childplease:

Ol “im cool with racists until they attack Kobe” ass niqqa

100% pure c00n.


** @Everythingg racist ass banned for the 20th time**
@10bandz
IMG-6247.jpg

“CHILL!! Dats my man right there!”

c00n ass niqqa
Random person: The sky is blue today
Someone: Yes it is.
Fake pro black enters: You know that "random person" is racist right??!?!? :damn:

This is the type of time you on. Aint you too old to be gossiping right? If you want to say something about someone's character bring the proof. You won't because you cant. But you'll keep saying it on the hope that someone just sees your post and runs off with your false characterisation.. A "ban" means nothing when I've been banned for saying there were "black" Indians or that there were "black" people in EVERY continent and not just Africa.
 
Top