/ Disagree 
Throw Paul Pierce on the Shaq/Kobe Lakers and they implode even faster.
There is this thing called chemistry in basketball, shyt ain't 2K.depends how you look at itSHOWTIME NEVER 3PEATED
AND THEY LOST 3 FINALS.
SHAQS LAKERS WERE MORE DOMINANT.
They only won 3 because they didn't stay together it ain't like they were prime contenders for a decade and only came up with 3, and they won those 3 back to back to back.
Shaq loves to use that term 'most dominant' like it means something so he can cover up the fact that there's very few important categories that he was undeniably the best ever at.
He was the best ever at plenty of categories and I'm not just talking stat wise, he has a right to use the term "most dominant" it means alot people trying to dismiss it is an attempt to cover up the fact that he was unstoppable at his position. People can talk about stats all they want but no Center in history could hold Shaq down, he would've beasted on Wilt who was 60 pounds smaller and Kareem and Russell trying to guard him would be laughable dudes were toothpicks at 225 and 220 respectively (CENTERS weighing 225 and 220
) Shaq had 100-105 pounds on them and on top of that Russell was only 6'10. He dropped near 40 against an arguably better defender in Duncan on a couple occasions who had more size than both of them, he's the GOAT Center for the simple reason no one could stop him and his own defense is underrated especially since no one least of all Kareem and Russell is backing his big ass down.
