She Really Thought She Was Getting $400 Just For Some Head

Smash or Pass?

  • Raw no egretts

    Votes: 8 7.3%
  • Raw and regret after post nut clarity

    Votes: 10 9.1%
  • Yes with a condom

    Votes: 24 21.8%
  • Head only

    Votes: 25 22.7%
  • No

    Votes: 43 39.1%

  • Total voters
    110

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,893
Reputation
8,810
Daps
96,525
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls
The rogue live is full of hard lessons

She needs guidance
full
 
Last edited:

Wildin

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
23,113
Reputation
7,273
Daps
71,246
Why are nikkas in here talking about rape charges when the reason you know it’s not rape in the first place is because of the VIDEO you’re watching with her giving mad consent

I don't know where your at, but I'm in America. It's kind of strange here. Women can have sexual contact with a man 40 years ago and be like ":jbhmm: you know what, I didn't like that, I didn't consent to that." Broads be on video, taking pictures, seen in public with these guys years later and the man still gets hemmed up.
 

Sukairain

Shahenshah
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
4,772
Reputation
2,292
Daps
17,410
Reppin
Straiya
Breh please tell me you aren't dumb enough to believe that a case in Australia has any bearing on the US. :mjtf:

Why not? We have the same legal system, common law. Past cases set precedents that apply across jurisdictions in all common law countries. A judge can reference a decision handed down in America to decide a case over here, and that's perfectly fine jurisprudence. Why can't an American judge then reference a decision handed in a case in Australia to justify his decision in an American courthouse? There's no reason he can't.

It only doesn't happen that often because all countries already have their own lengthy legal histories; all countries already have tons of previous cases that can be used to justify decisions made in current cases. An occasion like this where you need to go overseas to find a similar case and study the ruling made there is rare, but that doesn't mean it can't happen.

Now to be sure you don't make the decision based solely on a precedent set in a foreign country that also uses a common law system, but the foreign decision can be used as an argument by the judge supporting his decision. This principle is called obiter dictum, look it up
 
Last edited:

Higher Tech

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
15,031
Reputation
2,380
Daps
39,618
Reppin
Gary, Indiana
Why not? We have the same legal system, common law. Past cases set precedents that apply across jurisdictions in all common law countries. A judge can reference a decision handed down in America to decide a case over here, and that's perfectly fine jurisprudence. Why can't an American judge then reference a decision handed in a case in Australia to justify his decision in an American courthouse? There's no reason he can't.

It only doesn't happen that often because all countries already have their own lengthy legal histories; all countries already have tons of previous cases that can be used to justify decisions made in current cases. An occasion like this where you need to go overseas to find a similar case and study the ruling made there is rare, but that doesn't mean it can't happen.

Now to be sure you don't make the decision based solely on a precedent set in a foreign country that also uses a common law system, but the foreign decision can be used as an argument by the judge supporting his decision. This principle is called obiter dictum, look it up
Have you ever once seen it? The United States reference case law from any other country?
 
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
54,948
Reputation
25,390
Daps
255,316
Reppin
St louis
dingbat.

her: where is my money catpiss?:usure:
me: you can always take the blow job back.:ehh:
her: the fukk?:dwillhuh:
me: instead of going up and down....go down and up:dahell:
her: yeah because i'm taking that blowjob back.:usure:
me: youre really gonna take it back?:beli:
her: fukk yeah!:usure:
me: but you gave it to me:ehh:
her: pull your dikk out so i can take it back.:stopitslime:
me::ehh:

Fc28SY5.gif



UKVu0t8.gif
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,928
Reputation
5,989
Daps
163,296
Reppin
PG x MD
Word a case from Australia, where there was no video, the guy got 8 months and he intentionally brought a fraudulent envelope to look like cash? Hoes get promised shyt everyday

show me a case where a nikka said I ain’t got the money and went to jail for rape or shut the hell up with this ole “in this obscure law book you can go to jail spitting on the sidewalk” ass take
Even if you don’t get convicted of rape the hassle of getting arrested and going through all that shyt ain’t worth the free head you just got. I wouldn’t even do know shyt like this and if I stupidly did I’d throw her $100 just to get her off my back and charge that as my idiot tax.
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,928
Reputation
5,989
Daps
163,296
Reppin
PG x MD
Still proves my point. Not paying a prostitute is not a crime here which is why he was charged with solicitation.
The problem isn’t the conviction here. Dude has his name and mugshot smack on the internet. So when he tried to get a job and they google his name then what? And this guy is white. Don’t wanna be a black man with a mugshot on google.
 
Top