Shedeur told the Ravens not to draft him per Shefter

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,309
Reputation
2,899
Daps
69,947
Reppin
The Yay
It's the same reason players in the later rounds tell teams not to draft them so they can personally pick which team they want to negotiate their undrafted free agent contracts with post draft.….
This doesn't really happen.
Being drafted means getting a better contract, including guaranteed money, and usually teams are far less likely to cut players who were drafted.

An udfa contract starts with rookie minimum and has no guarantees; not to mention most udfas are being cannon fodder on practice squad and are always in danger of getting cut.


So no, players in the later rounds have very little incentive to tell teams to not be drafted. They lose financially and have less job security.


Wouldn't there be some examples if what you were saying was true? Who were some players who told teams not to draft them in later rounds and instead wanted to be udfas?
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,489
Reputation
1,313
Daps
60,635
This doesn't really happen.
Being drafted means getting a better contract, including guaranteed money, and usually teams are far less likely to cut players who were drafted.
Who told you this? Lol

Again you goofy c00ns clearly dont know what the fukk you're talking about :mjlol: Number one this is the NFL the only contracts negotiated as fully guaranteed are in the first round any thing after that is differing degrees of partial.

So going to a place as a late draft pick with little viable opportunity to showcase your skills can results in getting cutting cut anyways making that drafted contract irrelevant.

Making a team roster > getting drafted
An udfa contract starts with rookie minimum and has no guarantees; not to mention most udfas are being cannon fodder on practice squad and are always in danger of getting cut.

So no, players in the later rounds have very little incentive to tell teams to not be drafted. They lose financially and have less job security.

Wouldn't there be some examples if what you were saying was true? Who were some players who told teams not to draft them in later rounds and instead wanted to be udfas?
Secondly.….everthing you wrote here is completely counter factual...as you goofies generally tend to be :mjlol:

IMG-3188.jpg

IMG-3189.jpg



Again, you goofy nikkas and your constant obsession with speaking out of pure unmitigated ignorance is something I find great joy laughing at:dead:
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,309
Reputation
2,899
Daps
69,947
Reppin
The Yay
Who told you this? Lol

Again you goofy c00ns clearly dont know what the fukk you're talking about :mjlol: Number one this is the NFL the only contracts negotiated as fully guaranteed are in the first round any thing after that is differing degrees of partial.

So going to a place as a late draft pick with little viable opportunity to showcase your skills can results in getting cutting cut anyways making that drafted contract irrelevant.

Making a team roster > getting drafted

Secondly.….everthing you wrote here is completely counter factual...as you goofies generally tend to be :mjlol:

IMG-3188.jpg

IMG-3189.jpg



Again, you goofy nikkas and your constant obsession with speaking out of pure unmitigated ignorance is something I find great joy laughing at:dead:
highly ironic your remedial ass reading comprehension prime stanning ass accuses others of ignorance while you keep spouting nonsense

the rookie payscale gives 4m to 7th round players over four years.

look at rookie payscale in 2025:


now look at what highest paid udfas are making:


aside from isiah bond, no UDFA got a better deal than a 7th round pick, let alone 5th round picks

the four years vs three year shyt doesnt matter in the slightest if you actually dont perform. which overwhelming majority of the late rounders AND UDFAs dont.


the fact that *some* agents and clients prefer that they go undrafted over being 7th round picks, doesnt mean they TELL teams to not draft them in later rounds all the time
which is what YOU claimed

I asked you a very very simple question. If players tell teams to not draft them "all the time", why dont you name some of these players. Ten names will suffice. Surely its easy to name them :sas1:I will wait
 

mozichrome

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
89,087
Reputation
4,316
Daps
130,447
Reppin
NULL
whatever happened to healthy discussion. last 2 pages turning into folks just being called "dumb c00ns" and stuff. thats the overly militant talk that make me look at a person sideways.
like damn breh. if thats how you're going to speak the conversation can just be left alone
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,135
Reputation
21,637
Daps
306,559
This doesn't really happen.
Being drafted means getting a better contract, including guaranteed money, and usually teams are far less likely to cut players who were drafted.

An udfa contract starts with rookie minimum and has no guarantees; not to mention most udfas are being cannon fodder on practice squad and are always in danger of getting cut.


So no, players in the later rounds have very little incentive to tell teams to not be drafted. They lose financially and have less job security.


Wouldn't there be some examples if what you were saying was true? Who were some players who told teams not to draft them in later rounds and instead wanted to be udfas?

Very few. Even a late 7th rounder will get nearly 4 million in total salary if they can survive the contract. UFDA means you're getting at the max 200k to show up to training camp and you have no guarantee you're making the roster; more than likely you're going to be offered 30k-100k. Is it possible that a player may feel an UFDA offer is better than being drafted in the late 7th round for some reasons? I guess. Maybe he had more chemistry with the coaching staff offering the UFDA position, VS being drafted somewhere you know it'll be hard to make the team. Like say you're a running back and the Lions want you as a UFDA. You know the top 2 spots are 100% taken (Gibbs, Montgomery). You know they have an established #3, and drafted a #4 a couple years ago. Do you go there, or go somewhere with less certainty at that position?
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,489
Reputation
1,313
Daps
60,635
highly ironic your remedial ass reading comprehension prime stanning ass accuses others of ignorance while you keep spouting nonsense

the rookie payscale gives 4m to 7th round players over four years.
And there's the infamous coli “double down on dumb” once their incompetent babble has been thoroughly shytted on with reality :russ:

I just told your stupid ass that those late round contracts aren't guaranteed therefore making it essentially monopoly money and making a roster >>>> just getting drafted

This dumb c00n replies to that by posting the rookie scale lmao...yet...

IMG-3191.jpg

Just completely brain rotted mental illness LMAO..
aside from isiah bond, no UDFA got a better deal than a 7th round pick, let alone 5th round picks

IMG-3194.jpg

IMG-3195.jpg

IMG-3196.jpg


I LOVE laughing at you stupid ass nikkas bathing in your own ignorance.…. The shyt be so funny reading it on here :russ:

the four years vs three year shyt doesnt matter in the slightest if you actually dont perform. which overwhelming majority of the late rounders AND UDFAs dont.
The overwhelming majority of all draft picks don't perform dummy which is why you'll see late round guys TRY to put themselves in places where they feel they'd have the best chance to do just that ...the fukk are you even talking about :russ:

Dumb nikka said “who cares about getting to your second more lucrative contract faster”

LMAO just a comically ignorant ass muthafukka right here
the fact that *some* agents and clients prefer that they go undrafted over being 7th round picks, doesnt mean they TELL teams to not draft them in later rounds all the time
which is what YOU claimed I asked you a very very simple question. If players tell teams to not draft them "all the time", why dont you name some of these players. Ten names will suffice. Surely its easy to name them :sas1:I will wait
This dumb nikka just got an entire article excuse me two articles explaining directly from agents executives and players on why they tell teams to a let them hit UDFA and the only reply his slow ass can conjure up is “nuh uhhhh” :dead:


Perfect summation of your stereotypical Coli Buffoon LMAO
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,489
Reputation
1,313
Daps
60,635
whatever happened to healthy discussion. last 2 pages turning into folks just being called "dumb c00ns" and stuff. thats the overly militant talk that make me look at a person sideways.
like damn breh. if thats how you're going to speak the conversation can just be left alone
Look at this c00n lover :scust:
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
17,674
Reputation
3,267
Daps
81,812
Reppin
NULL
These nikkas still talking like Shaduer was supposed to make a decision based on the assumption Lamar would get hurt. :unimpressed:

You know how Coli nikkas are. Everybody can see the future on here. I wouldn't want to play behind Jalen Hurts and Lamar Jackson either. The Browns made alot more sense. If you're Shedeur, you see a 5"10 midget you think you can beat and a 40-year-old man that won't play forever. Shedeur just didn't calculate that Cleveland would try to sabotage him and refuse to give him any chances. I still think Shedeur ends up succeeding though. Eventually, he will get on the field, and teams will be calling for him.
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,489
Reputation
1,313
Daps
60,635
Shedeur stans logic would make more sense if it didn't involve the Browns.

They've had 39 different starting QB's since Tim Couch was their QB, what faith do you actually have that Shedeur's tenure will turn out any different?
Got these c00ns reduced to “Buhh buhh buh...Tim Couch”

:russ: Hilarious
 
Top