

it’s a conFor the first time in the 23-year history of our luxury report, the market’s customer base contracted. We estimate the market lost about 50 million customers globally between 2022 and 2024, shrinking from 400 million customers to an estimated 350 million at the end of 2024. This contraction may have resulted in part from elevation strategies, which prioritized top-tier clients. These very important clients (VICs), who represent just over 2% of the total customer base, now account for 45% of global luxury purchases, up from 35% in 2021. However, VICs feel less pampered by brands, as their experiences have become more transactional.

lol @ including coach and Kate spade.I hate these IG hip hop 'news' sites.
Some discrepancies:
But iTsOnSitE wants us to believe that everyone in the projects is walking around with Gucci Belts
- Bain mentioned nothing of the lower class, only the middle class ($75k - $150k)
- The middle class is something like 4x the size of the upper class, so it is not totally shocking they would be a greater share of any market
- Luxury brands includes a WIDE variety of lower-luxury brands like Kate Spade and Coach.
![]()
The follow up question is “what percentage of consumers as a whole fall into the middle class range.” I’d imagine that it’s the overwhelming majority since wealth is concentrated among a small number of people. If the upper class only makes up like 10% (or less) of the population, it stands to reason that middle class consumers would make up a very large percentage of ALL goods, except the infeasible ones that they’d never be able to afford, even living paycheck to paycheck.I don't believe this....
You don't have to.I don't believe this....
Exactly what i'm saying.The follow up question is “what percentage of consumers as a whole fall into the middle class range.” I’d imagine that it’s the overwhelming majority since wealth is concentrated among a small number of people. If the upper class only makes up like 10% (or less) of the population, it stands to reason that middle class consumers would make up a very large percentage of ALL goods, except the infeasible ones that they’d never be able to afford, even living paycheck to paycheck.
I’m sure the ratio is still larger than it should be but it may not be big of a deal as the headline makes it seem.
This is what I was wondering and makes sense. I can’t articulate it, but if only the wealthy were buying these brands, numbers wise, their sales wouldn’t be that huge and they wouldn’t have as many brick and mortar storesI hate these IG hip hop 'news' sites.
Some discrepancies:
But iTsOnSitE wants us to believe that everyone in the projects is walking around with Gucci Belts
- Bain mentioned nothing of the lower class, only the middle class ($75k - $150k)
- The middle class is something like 4x the size of the upper class, so it is not totally shocking they would be a greater share of any market
- Luxury brands includes a WIDE variety of lower-luxury brands like Kate Spade and Coach.
![]()
This is what I was trying to say… lol long day at work and I couldn’t put the sentences together lolwell when rich people make up like 5% of the population, of course their consumption is not going to reach the level of the remaining 95%
its maths.
![]()
swisswatches-magazine.com
Bingo.I hate these IG hip hop 'news' sites.
Some discrepancies:
But iTsOnSitE wants us to believe that everyone in the projects is walking around with Gucci Belts
- Bain mentioned nothing of the lower class, only the middle class ($75k - $150k)
- The middle class is something like 4x the size of the upper class, so it is not totally shocking they would be a greater share of any market
- Luxury brands includes a WIDE variety of lower-luxury brands like Kate Spade and Coach.
![]()
For every rich catHow is that even possible![]()