CashmereThoughts
Veteran
Do they chop off hands in India 


Cut the hand off a Punjabi tryna steal from meDo they chop off hands in India![]()


Am I missing something lol.. yall deporting people over shoplifting now? This is the wave?
shes a tourist thats stealing. What country wouldn't revoke your visa and send you back home.Ok but why is this newsworthy?shes a tourist thats stealing. What country wouldn't revoke your visa and send you back home.
Ok but why is this newsworthy?
Ppl steal everyday….

@ 1:06 mark
watched this (and other videos like this) on YouTube the other day. Man Indians are annoying as fukk.My bad thought this was cnn or some shyt.. I was likeCurrent admin. hit the ground running targeting international travelers, students, legal immigrants, and the undocumented for every possible violation, even to the point of making up shyt and bending the law
Certain it got global coverage. In the midst of all of that, this woman got the bright idea to travel here and steal items from retail.
Like an idiot.
The link at the top is from an Indian media site, they reported it as a warning to future travelers.
why is this a big deal
STFUread minds brehs.
they need to prove intent.
before leaving the shop intent is typically signalled by actions such as concealing items, changing price tags/bar codes etc.
she did none of those.
defense lawyer needs to argue that she had no intention to leave the premises and that the security acted precipitously.
the point of no return is leaving the premises where she comes from.
theft requires intent.
the law:
"Theft is the taking of another person’s personal property with the intent of depriving that person of the use of their property"
![]()
theft
www.law.cornell.edu
lawyer needs to argue that she was not familiar with american systems and was busy with an emergency on the phone.
she moved to the doors to get a better signal but did not leave.
-
someone visited us from denmark last weekend. they walked past the auto tills with an item in their hand due to confusion and imperative (to prevent someone taking stuff from their trolley which they had left alone by the exit). we called them back.
thievery in denmark is much rarer so it didn't occur to them that someone might steal from their trolley. similarly they didn't think that they could be accused of something just for passing a line. high suspicion and criminal hyper vigilance is just not a thing there.
stupid? check. fish-out-of-water? check. dangerous? check. theft? no, as there was no intent.
now if i had done it, intent would be more likely because i know the local systems.
non-american ass nikkaPolice don’t need to prove intent when they arrest her and prosecutors only need to show that it’s reasonable to assume the bytch was shoplifting.read minds brehs.
they need to prove intent.
before leaving the shop intent is typically signalled by actions such as concealing items, changing price tags/bar codes etc.
she did none of those.
defense lawyer needs to argue that she had no intention to leave the premises and that the security acted precipitously.
the point of no return is leaving the premises where she comes from.
theft requires intent.
the law:
"Theft is the taking of another person’s personal property with the intent of depriving that person of the use of their property"
![]()
theft
www.law.cornell.edu
lawyer needs to argue that she was not familiar with american systems and was busy with an emergency on the phone.
she moved to the doors to get a better signal but did not leave.
-
someone visited us from denmark last weekend. they walked past the auto tills with an item in their hand due to confusion and imperative (to prevent someone taking stuff from their trolley which they had left alone by the exit). we called them back.
thievery in denmark is much rarer so it didn't occur to them that someone might steal from their trolley. similarly they didn't think that they could be accused of something just for passing a line. high suspicion and criminal hyper vigilance is just not a thing there.
stupid? check. fish-out-of-water? check. dangerous? check. theft? no, as there was no intent.
now if i had done it, intent would be more likely because i know the local systems.