#shortgang do not enter this thread

Devilinurear

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
28,041
Reputation
6,574
Daps
93,122
Reppin
NULL
I had friends who were considered pretty boys during my teenage years. Girls would flock to them and just hand them their numbers. It was enough to make young man envious of how easy it was for them. Then I realized that wasting my time worry about how easy it was for them, did not do anything for me. Envy over what others have and recieve is just a wasted effort. So, I decided to actually build myself up.

You may not be born with handsome gang genes. You may even be destined to lead the ravaging armies of ugly gang as a warlord. Still, always remember that charisma has nothing to do with your appearance. You can always develop your charisma to a point that women find you compelling inspite of your ugly god genes.

Example, look at this man:

_131939863_genghisgetty.jpg.webp


He has more desendents than every handsome gang member combined. If you can't be pretty, be a leader of men. Be charistmatic. It is far better than being a pretty boy in the long run. Looks will open doors, charisma will create doors.

BTW That is Genghis Khan.
He raped alot of women
:what:
 

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
6,477
Reputation
5,528
Daps
38,101
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
He raped alot of women
:what:

Great Myths and Legends: Genghis Khan: Barbarian Conqueror or Harbinger of Democracy​


Dr. Morris Rossabi, Senior Research Scholar, Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, Columbia University

"The world has generally viewed Genghis Khan as a barbaric conqueror whose troops raped and murdered hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people and pillaged and often destroyed villages, towns, and cities throughout Asia and Europe. However, several popular writers have recently portrayed him as an advocate of democracy, international law, and women's rights. Morris Rossabi, Senior Research Scholar, Queens College, Columbia University, offers this illustrated lecture, which seeks to provide a balanced depiction of Genghis Khan and to explain the reasons for the myths that have developed about the man and the Mongolian people who established the largest contiguous land empire in world history."


No story or history is as simple as you may think it is. How someone is characterized in history is based on whom is writing the history or telling the story.
 

Devilinurear

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
28,041
Reputation
6,574
Daps
93,122
Reppin
NULL

Great Myths and Legends: Genghis Khan: Barbarian Conqueror or Harbinger of Democracy​


Dr. Morris Rossabi, Senior Research Scholar, Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, Columbia University

"The world has generally viewed Genghis Khan as a barbaric conqueror whose troops raped and murdered hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people and pillaged and often destroyed villages, towns, and cities throughout Asia and Europe. However, several popular writers have recently portrayed him as an advocate of democracy, international law, and women's rights. Morris Rossabi, Senior Research Scholar, Queens College, Columbia University, offers this illustrated lecture, which seeks to provide a balanced depiction of Genghis Khan and to explain the reasons for the myths that have developed about the man and the Mongolian people who established the largest contiguous land empire in world history."



No story or history is as simple as you may think it is. How someone is characterized in history is based on whom is writing the history or telling the story.
:what:
He didn't get those women from his charisma.
Why are you now acting like armies don't do what armies do?

A famous quote from the Khan
The greatest happiness is to vanquish your enemies, to chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth, to see those dear to them bathed in tears, to clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
 

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
6,477
Reputation
5,528
Daps
38,101
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
:what:
He didn't get those women from his charisma.
Why are you now acting like armies don't do what armies do?

A famous quote from the Khan
The greatest happiness is to vanquish your enemies, to chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth, to see those dear to them bathed in tears, to clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
Do you have anything to counter what I put up that is of equal validity, or do you have your high school education that you are trying to compare to a PHD whom is an expert in this particular field from Columbia University?

Please, come back with something more than just you talking about an issue you are nowhere near an expert about without the aid of an expert's opinion. You are not an expert, so your position merits no attention until you actually bring an expert in to back it, like I did for mine.
 

Devilinurear

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
28,041
Reputation
6,574
Daps
93,122
Reppin
NULL
Do you have anything to counter what I put up that is of equal validity, or do you have your high school education that you are trying to compare to a PHD whom is an expert in this particular field from Columbia University?

Please, come back with something more than just you talking about an issue you are nowhere near an expert about without the aid of an expert's opinion. You are not an expert, so your position merits no attention until you actually bring an expert in to back it, like I did for mine.
So you can't counter the Khans own words
:ufdup:
 

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
6,477
Reputation
5,528
Daps
38,101
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
So you can't counter the Khans own words
:ufdup:
Put up the Khan's own words, and then make sure it is actually verified to be his words. Then we can discuss what his own words imply.

So like I said before, use a verifiable source to support your position. Are you incapable of doing something so simple as that?
 

Devilinurear

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
28,041
Reputation
6,574
Daps
93,122
Reppin
NULL
Put up the Khan's own words, and then make sure it is actually verified to be his words. Then we can discuss what his own words imply.

So like I said before, use a verifiable source to support your position. Are you incapable of doing something so simple as that?
:pacspit:
Did some research and that quote was not in the secret history of mongols like I thought. I am man enough to admit I am wrong but your condescending tone is not appreciated.
 

ConPHIdential

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
1,793
Reputation
684
Daps
6,587
A regular every day tall breh ain’t getting no more p*ssy than a short breh.
 

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
6,477
Reputation
5,528
Daps
38,101
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
:pacspit:
Did some research and that quote was not in the secret history of mongols like I thought. I am man enough to admit I am wrong but your condescending tone is not appreciated.

You may not have liked my tone, but I did it for a particular purpose. I am glad you have risen up to the challenge and did the research yourself. I also congratulate you on admitting that you were mistaken. You have done, what few are apt to do. That deserves praise.
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,416
Reputation
4,312
Daps
82,478
Do you have anything to counter what I put up that is of equal validity, or do you have your high school education that you are trying to compare to a PHD whom is an expert in this particular field from Columbia University?

Please, come back with something more than just you talking about an issue you are nowhere near an expert about without the aid of an expert's opinion. You are not an expert, so your position merits no attention until you actually bring an expert in to back it, like I did for mine.
That article is literally a whitewashing of Mongol oppression to serve as a thinly veiled defense of US imperialism and white hegemony.

You should start qualifying these "experts", their motivations, and start using your own discernment.
 
Top