Should Golden State Trade for LeBron James this Summer?

[Mindfield333]

fukk no

And Steph has already made it known that he's not interested because he KNOWS what that entails...the Golden State Warriors becoming a vassal squad to LeBron James

Steph definitely won’t get that finals mvp if that happens

 

[NoMorePie]

If I'm the Lakers I entertain the idea.

Not saying yes... But I entertain it. Surprised LeBron doesn't have a no trade clause

 

[T'Challa Trillmonger]

i think the dubs core respect bron but they wanna position themselves as the undisputed ones opposing bron during his "era"

 

[CHICAGO]

Man, shyt changes when you lose. Look at Draymond keeping the door open on his show. Makes sense to me.

DRAYMOND IS SIGNED
TO BRON UNDER KLUTCH SPORTS.
OF COURSE HE WOULDNT
MIND PLAYING WITH BRON.

STEPHS LEGACY GAINS
NOTHING FROM PLAYING
WITH BRON...

BRON WILL ALWAYS
STAY AHEAD OF HIM IN
THE RING COUNT AND
ITLL HELP HIM GET TO MJ RING COUNT.

​

 

[GoldenGlove]

Should actually go to the Knicks.
If it weren't for slimeball lowlife NY sports reporters, he might have taken his talents to the Knicks for The Decision.

On the tail end of his career, and with low expectations for the franchise this could be a good landing spot.

I don't think Bron would go that far away from LA with all that he has going on out there.

 

[GoldenGlove]

DRAYMOND IS SIGNED
TO BRON UNDER KLUTCH SPORTS.
OF COURSE HE WOULDNT
MIND PLAYING WITH BRON.


​

Yes, I know. Which is also why, when I saw that interview and how Draymond specifically wanted Steph to go more in depth with his response, I thought there's something to this potentially.

 

[Methodical]

Hell no. Bron would change the system and ruin the chemistry and also, would not look good on his legacy, etc.

 

[CHICAGO]

the kind of move LeBron would make if he was washed and missed half the year with injuries and stuff. Not now.

Besides, LeBron isn't ready to hear the word NO when it comes to personnel decisions.

BRON WOULD DEFINITELY
MAKE THAT MOVE NOW...

HES ALREADY PUBLICLY PUT THE IDEA
IN THE AIR THE WAY HE USUALLY
DOES WHEN HES PLANNING ON
MAKING IT A REALITY...

THE LAKERS ARE STUCK
WITH THAT TEAM WHICH MEANS
BRON HAS TO WASTE ANOTHER
YEAR ON A NON COMPETITOR.

HE KNOWS HIS RINGS
WONT HOLD THE SAME WEIGHT
IF HE GETS THEM AS A WASHED UP
"BUS RIDER".

​

 

[god shamgod]

No. That’s what lebron needs to win championships , stacked squads. Gs is just helping his legacy in that scenario

WHEN the grizz or suns end these pretenders, gobert is the move. Then they’ll be contenders again

 

[KidJSoul]

He’s never won a title “solo” though. You’re acting like Draymond and Klay aren’t also synonymous with these runs.

Breh, Klay and Dray were his supporting cast, Steph was the main star of those teams, you know what it means

 

[8WON6]

the internet would melt.

 

[Jerz]

3 places you know Lebron ain't welcome. Golden St, Brooklyn and the Clippers. Steph, KD, and Kawhi already told em no. Golden st need to use them assets to after Gobert

 

[Remote]

The Warriors don't need Lebron.

But the Lakers should trade Lebron, but not for the reasons people on this board seem to believe. People believe that Lebron is the problem with the Lakers. The problem with the Lakers is...frankly...everyone else not named Anthony Davis. LA needs to move Lebron because he's the only player they have that can bring valuable pieces in return.

 

[tremonthustler1]

If I'm the Lakers I entertain the idea.

Not saying yes... But I entertain it. Surprised LeBron doesn't have a no trade clause

Because it's implied.

If the Lakers are gonna do that, then they kinda have to trade Anthony Davis first to recoup whatever draft capital they lost for getting him in the first place.


Otherwise the Lakers are lose 60+ games only to get pick swapped by the Pelicans.

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

Klutch propaganda. Let Lebron rot in LA. He doesn’t like to move the ball or play defense, so trading for him makes no sense. Unless it’s for Draymond who is useless.