MVike28
right around the ACC
Cool.Why would you ask something you already know the answer to?
Cool.Why would you ask something you already know the answer to?
Yeah. Cavs shot 39% and still won Game 2.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Cavs shooters go off and the Warriors to get blown out.


It would be an honorYou really are well on the way to dethroning @Swagnificent as the WOAT and you ain't even been posting that long.
![]()


Yeah my bad that was the Warriors Fg%.
Even more amazing. Cavs shoot 32% and still win and all I here are dudes saying GS needs to just "shoot better."
So what happens when the Cavs start to shoot better?
We already see the Cavs can win even with a lower FG% than the Warriors. So what happens when dudes like JR and Shump get hot? LeBron? Dellevadova?
Idk, but some of the GSW facial expressions and body language show they don't want it. It's like well not to say their team or a player doesn't have "clutch gene" or a"killer" its something else. Like something has been weird those first two games. Like their too cool for school, so laxadazecal, get mad. Get even, something. Im not saying be somebody else, but this is the Nba Finals. The Cavs and Warriors match up with each other damn well. But, I feel something is missing from the Warriors. fukking Jones had a game high. James Jones. like wherw is that veteran to say, look mam, slow down, dont rush. or....communicate guys, its idk
This nikka mixed lackadaisical and hexadecimal together
I think GS relying too much on 3'sIf Klay and Steph both don't show up then it's a problem. Otherwise their shooting will keep it close or hold off the Cavs. Nothing like dagger threes to stop momentum/comeback or stretch a lead.
Exactly..They won game 2 based on rebounding. 24 extra possessions they got from offensive rebounding. 14 offensive rebounds (and 10 extra offensive team rebounds) to the the Warriors 35 defensive rebounds was the key to the game. Cavs won the total rebounding battle 75 to 53.......
Game 2 seems like an anomaly. Both teams will shoot better and the rebounding battle won't be as drastic.....although it should look a bit more like game 1.
Ironically a Delly offensive rebound, foul and subsequent FTs ended the game.
They don't see thisSo after they called a phantom foul on Klay (when he had nine points in the first five minutes), forcing him to leave the game were the refs trying their hardest to give the Warriors the game? So after they allowed Tristan to get away with hacking in the paint were the refs trying their hardest to give the Warriors the game? So after they allowed Bron to constantly use his offhand to gain separation from his defender were the refs trying their hardest to give the Warriors the game? So after they allowed Mozgov to travel on a number of possessions were the refs trying their hardest to give the Warriors the game?
![]()

Wow. Did anyone make a topic what the Chicago sun times wrote? Unbelievable man
http://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/...ady-better-numbers-michael-jordan-1998-finals




win thisbreh you killing this thread with logic.Yeah my bad that was the Warriors Fg%.
Even more amazing. Cavs shoot 32% and still win and all I here are dudes saying GS needs to just "shoot better."
So what happens when the Cavs start to shoot better?
We already see the Cavs can win even with a lower FG% than the Warriors. So what happens when dudes like JR and Shump get hot? LeBron? Dellevadova?