This always struck me as a difficult talking point.
On one hand, you've got religious people trying to protect their conservative sexual values and think that endorsing sex without reproduction challenges that belief.
On the other hand, women claim that it helps to manage their menstruation and of course helps women to plan their reproduction.
But should the government pay for all medical related expenses? Is this crossing the line similar to how insurance doesn't cover plainly cosmetic procedures?
On one hand, you've got religious people trying to protect their conservative sexual values and think that endorsing sex without reproduction challenges that belief.
On the other hand, women claim that it helps to manage their menstruation and of course helps women to plan their reproduction.
But should the government pay for all medical related expenses? Is this crossing the line similar to how insurance doesn't cover plainly cosmetic procedures?

