ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
That is a common and already debunked misconceptionMargret Sanger would be very proud of the current state of the black community, we're all falling right in order with their plans
That is a common and already debunked misconceptionMargret Sanger would be very proud of the current state of the black community, we're all falling right in order with their plans
Actually yes, birth control pills are very cheap and will reduce the amount of unplanned pregnancies in impoverished communities. In conjunction with the use of condoms will nearly eradicate the chance of accidental pregnancies. Now this needs to happen in conjunction with increased education about the ups and downs, but I can assure you in the long run that this cheaper than raising unwanted children in the system and giving out welfare.
Are you going on record stating that there is a direct correlation between crime and povertyAgreed.
The Roe v Wade abortion decision was the single greatest factor for the decline in crime rates in the past 3 decades. Paying a small amount now for BC will reap dividends when we don't have major crime rates down the road due to unwanted pregnancies/people that can't properly care for their kids.

Are you going on record stating that there is a direct correlation between crime and poverty
*points microphone at Ill*
Paying for birth control is the logical slippery slope into promoting eugenics.
There's your societal issue.
It wasn't that long ago that Black women and Native American women and 'lesser' white women were sterilized against their will and without their consent. Happened one hundred years ago, happened 50 years ago, happened 20 years ago. We may even find out that it's still happening, but they've gotten slicker about it.
Besides, you don't pay for just women's birth control, you pay for men's as well.
Oh no need for the link friend...I'm just trollingOf coarse. Ive never said otherwise. Here's a good read on how Roe v Wade drastically reduced the crime rate in this country as well as others that allowed abortions.
Freakonomics » Abortion and crime: who should you believe?

Oh no need for the link friend...I'm just trolling
Nah but seriously, a lot of people either disagree with you or just don't agree. They would much rather keep prisons packed, incarcerate and destroy the minds of millions of men and women (high percentage of minorities!) than to simply admit that they probably would not have committed these crimes if they grew up in a household with both parents and not in poverty.

Doesn't matter about who Margaret Sanger is. I'm talking about today.Margret Sanger would be very proud of the current state of the black community, we're all falling right in order with their plans
They are usually either gay or super religious fukktardsYes, it's either pay for birth control or have abortion rates go up along with more kids being on government aid until they're 18.
Birth control has other uses than keeping women from getting pregnant. It's helps with heavy bleeding, lowers the risk of certain cancers, etc.
I never understood men who are against women's reproductive rights but want to fukk all the time![]()
That's the thing tho breh...@Ill and @ExodusNirvana I'm well aware of that freakanomics post and the surrounding arguments...but on principle, should the government pay?
This isn't a medical decision we're talking here. This is family planning, good or bad.
And yes, relief from menstruation etc.

Doesn't matter about who Margaret Sanger is. I'm talking about today.
Fact of the matter is, we're talking bout the Pill and IUDs and Nuvarings, etc.
That is a common and already debunked misconception

Do you have any links for this? As far as I understood forced sterilization was very rare when compared to rape and giving birth to a mixed baby.